When this was mentioned, that poster declared that over half the population understood so declared it was not a problem.
The inconsistency in those types of answers are very clear once you see them. It is all ok if nearly the population are disadvantaged by a change demanded by less than 1% of the population and that nearly half is expected to be resilient and cope. But it is apparently imperative that those 1% are never expected to be resilient and cope.
And it is even worse that in that nearly half are the people who are truly the most marginalised in the UK. Including those with language difficulties (through learning issues and not knowing English well, or then through poor translation into the language they know).
But hey! If it makes the group that Balletcat centres feel better, that is all that matters. Because that group exists as one simultaneously that is:
so very tiny yet has changed the meaning of so many words to suit their specific needs….
have rates of sex crime that is at least the same rate of offending as all other UK male people, yet should be welcomed into female single sex spaces….
But yes… half of the population understanding the language was enough for that poster.