I think that it is really complicated.
I don’t think there is any doubt that Trump has a dubious personality. On the other hand he does seem to ‘get’ why a large proportion of the electorate is disaffected or at least acts like he does, whereas Kamala basically told them to be happy with their lot.
I do think that both the left and right wing have anti democratic tendencies. Trump is more out and proud about his but Biden somewhat let the cat out of the bag when he called Trump supporters ‘the deplorables’. If you despise the demos in a democracy, you can’t expect them to vote for you!
There has been a massive tendency in Europe, especially, but also in the U.S to prioritise what those really struggling might call luxuries: green energy investment, foreign wars, rights of asylum seekers, ‘woke’ priorities, limits on experimentation on genetics and AI etc etc. Lots here will think my list aren’t luxuries but necessities. But who is really paying for them? If energy goes up 10% and it is 5% of your budget, you don’t really feel it, but if it is 30% of your budget and all your discretionary expenditure, it becomes a major issue and ‘Drill, Baby, Drill’ makes a lot of sense.
And the 2008 bailout, QE, Covid subsidies to the rich followed by rampant inflation really broke the contract between the governors and the governed.
Trump is unashamedly isolationist and pro growth. He wants to build and manufacture in the U.S. That is horrible globally but it isn’t if you are a low to medium skilled worker in the U.S who wants the dignity of an honest job.
The liberal left needs a radical rethink as to how they can sell ‘safe’ low growth policies to the poorer. They either need to be far more radical on tax and redistribution or they need to curb some of their more ambitious ideas. They should also be an awful lot less smug! They lost and it wasn’t the stupid electorate; it was because they failed to even try to sell their ideas to whole swathes of voters.