Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that gay and lesbian people should be able to have a conference in peace

1000 replies

nothingcomestonothing · 11/10/2024 19:10

Transactivists have tried to disrupt the LGBA conference by releasing insects into the venue. It's disgusting . Because they don't think gay men and lesbians should be allowed to meet peacefully without them.

No one is stopping transpeople from having events by themselves, why shouldn't gay men and lesbians be able to meet if that's what they want to do? It's just repackaged homophobia - same sex attracted people aren't allowed to have their own conference.

https://x.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1844763982453670350

x.com

https://x.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1844763982453670350

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Ereshkigalangcleg · 13/10/2024 16:28

It is possible he could mistakenly have the genuine belief that the male person he feels attracted to is a woman. Then he would likely be shocked on discovering his error, if he is not gay or bisexual.

Drfosters · 13/10/2024 16:28

PiggleToes · 13/10/2024 16:19

She would be bi-sexual

Wow.

I find it astonishing that people on this thread believe that they have the right/ legitimate mandate/ qualifications to label and judge other people's sexuality (in ways that directly contradicts those people's own self knowledge of sexuality), and yet you are one's who are fighting homophobia and rights for sexual autonomy?

Makes no sense whatsoever.

Edited

You need to define each type of sexuality for it to be a sexuality!!

I have asked you dictionary define a lesbian if it isn’t a crudely a person with a vagina (adult human female) attracted to another person with a vagina.

if there is another definition you want to use then let me know but you have to objectively able to allocate a person into the group. It can’t be based on feelings alone but an objective test.

PiggleToes · 13/10/2024 16:29

Ereshkigalangcleg · 13/10/2024 16:25

So any man who is attracted to any trans woman is automatically either gay or bisexual?

Yes, that's correct.

So judgemental, homophobic, regressive and harmful :(.

What a world, that people still think that have the right to judge and define the sexuality of others.

minpinlove · 13/10/2024 16:32

no @PiggleToes not regressive or homophobic or bigoted.
A male who is attracted to and sleeps with another male is either gay or bisexual. This is fact not opinion.

PiggleToes · 13/10/2024 16:33

Ereshkigalangcleg · 13/10/2024 16:28

It is possible he could mistakenly have the genuine belief that the male person he feels attracted to is a woman. Then he would likely be shocked on discovering his error, if he is not gay or bisexual.

So it's not being attracted to a trans woman that makes a man gay or bisexual?

A man can be attracted to a trans woman and be straight (as long as he doesn't know she is trans?)

PiggleToes · 13/10/2024 16:34

minpinlove · 13/10/2024 16:32

no @PiggleToes not regressive or homophobic or bigoted.
A male who is attracted to and sleeps with another male is either gay or bisexual. This is fact not opinion.

Oh good, I'm glad you have been appointed Lord of all things related to the sexuality of others.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 13/10/2024 16:34

It's not homophobic to say a man attracted to a "trans woman" (a biological male) is gay or bisexual, because sexual orientation is about sex, not identity.

Gay men need to have the language to describe the sexual orientation of being only attracted to your own sex, as they have traditionally faced persecution, discrimination and prejudice for only being attracted to men.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 13/10/2024 16:36

A man can be attracted to a trans woman and be straight (as long as he doesn't know she is trans?)

He is either straight or he isn't. If it's mistaken, he isn't going to want to proceed once he learns the truth. Sex by deception is a crime people have gone to prison for.

minpinlove · 13/10/2024 16:36

are you trying to say that a male who sleeps with a trans woman can also be heterosexual , @PiggleToes ?
If a male is sexually attracted to and has sex with another male, they're not straight. Fact.

Runor · 13/10/2024 16:37

🙄 Piggle, words have meanings! It is not xxphobic to use words in line with their definitions. Want to describe something else? Use another word!

I notice eg that when you said “ a man attracted to a women”, you needed to rephrase to “ a man attracted to a transwoman” to make the point you wanted - because ‘transwoman’ and ‘woman’ - as you demonstrated - have different meanings.

‘Lesbian’ has a meaning, and if you use it to describe a woman who finds male bodies sexually attractive, then what you say will be very difficult for other people to interpret

HotSource · 13/10/2024 16:37

PiggleToes · 13/10/2024 16:29

So judgemental, homophobic, regressive and harmful :(.

What a world, that people still think that have the right to judge and define the sexuality of others.

Edited

And yet… gay men and lesbian women whose sexuality is based in same sex attraction, not gender attraction, have been constantly called transphobic, narrow minded, bigoted and exclusionary.

Judgemental, and very harmful where it seeks to coercively persuade people to accept sexual advances based in gender.

i.e the very origins of LGBA. Seeking freedom from such judgemental pressure from trans activists .

Kucinghitam · 13/10/2024 16:37

After 330-ish posts, I think we have now clearly established that The Righteous strongly disagree with LGB Alliance (I mean, we got the idea way back on the first page).

But this thread is about the sabotage of a conference. So to reiterate, ultimately the main points here are simply:

  • Should people be free to organise and self-associate according to their own interests/viewpoints?
  • If one disagrees with said group's viewpoints for any reason, however justified in their own Righteous minds, is it or is it not acceptable to prevent that group from meeting and speaking?

All the sad face emojis in the universe don't answer the key questions.

minpinlove · 13/10/2024 16:38

you're funny @PiggleToes as you try to redefine the words gay and straight..! Next you'll be telling us that lesbians are bigoted for not wanting to sleep with trans women....

LockForMultiball · 13/10/2024 16:38

PiggleToes · 13/10/2024 16:33

So it's not being attracted to a trans woman that makes a man gay or bisexual?

A man can be attracted to a trans woman and be straight (as long as he doesn't know she is trans?)

Edited

Have you ever seen those cakes that really, really look like something else?

Just because someone wants the thing they think it is, doesn't mean they like cake. If they're really not into cake, then they'll lose interest when they discover what it really is.

PiggleToes · 13/10/2024 16:39

minpinlove · 13/10/2024 16:36

are you trying to say that a male who sleeps with a trans woman can also be heterosexual , @PiggleToes ?
If a male is sexually attracted to and has sex with another male, they're not straight. Fact.

Are you trying to say that a male who sleeps with a trans woman can also be heterosexual?

Of course they can! Plenty of straight men are attracted to trans women.

ahemfem · 13/10/2024 16:40

Kucinghitam · 13/10/2024 16:37

After 330-ish posts, I think we have now clearly established that The Righteous strongly disagree with LGB Alliance (I mean, we got the idea way back on the first page).

But this thread is about the sabotage of a conference. So to reiterate, ultimately the main points here are simply:

  • Should people be free to organise and self-associate according to their own interests/viewpoints?
  • If one disagrees with said group's viewpoints for any reason, however justified in their own Righteous minds, is it or is it not acceptable to prevent that group from meeting and speaking?

All the sad face emojis in the universe don't answer the key questions.

I think a protest outside would have been fair enough and they should have left the insects out of it.

EasternStandard · 13/10/2024 16:40

Kucinghitam · 13/10/2024 16:37

After 330-ish posts, I think we have now clearly established that The Righteous strongly disagree with LGB Alliance (I mean, we got the idea way back on the first page).

But this thread is about the sabotage of a conference. So to reiterate, ultimately the main points here are simply:

  • Should people be free to organise and self-associate according to their own interests/viewpoints?
  • If one disagrees with said group's viewpoints for any reason, however justified in their own Righteous minds, is it or is it not acceptable to prevent that group from meeting and speaking?

All the sad face emojis in the universe don't answer the key questions.

@PiggleToes could you be clear on whether people who define sexuality differently to you can meet?

PiggleToes · 13/10/2024 16:41

Runor · 13/10/2024 16:37

🙄 Piggle, words have meanings! It is not xxphobic to use words in line with their definitions. Want to describe something else? Use another word!

I notice eg that when you said “ a man attracted to a women”, you needed to rephrase to “ a man attracted to a transwoman” to make the point you wanted - because ‘transwoman’ and ‘woman’ - as you demonstrated - have different meanings.

‘Lesbian’ has a meaning, and if you use it to describe a woman who finds male bodies sexually attractive, then what you say will be very difficult for other people to interpret

Eh?

I didn't "rephrase" it was a typo.

We all agree that a heterosexual men are attracted to women. The question is can a man be attracted to a trans woman and be heterosexual.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 13/10/2024 16:41

PiggleToes · 13/10/2024 16:29

So judgemental, homophobic, regressive and harmful :(.

What a world, that people still think that have the right to judge and define the sexuality of others.

Edited

It's not judging. It's describing and defining. People can do what they like as long as it's lawful and consensual, but let's describe it with clearly agreed language so we all know what we're talking about.

Kucinghitam · 13/10/2024 16:41

One could be forgiven for thinking that The Righteous are actually rather unBrave and unStunning, since they just want to obfuscate and distract rather than answering the questions actually pertinent to the thread.

minpinlove · 13/10/2024 16:42

The question is can a man be attracted to a trans woman and be heterosexual

The answer is No.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 13/10/2024 16:43

The question is can a man be attracted to a trans woman and be heterosexual.

Not knowingly, no. That would be a bisexual man.

minpinlove · 13/10/2024 16:43

and if he was, he's bisexual.

SinnerBoy · 13/10/2024 16:43

Runor · Today 15:48

Thankyou! I’m always happy to ask for an explanation when I don’t understand. Expect I’ll have finished the popcorn before I get an answer though….

I hope you didn't hold your breath.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 13/10/2024 16:44

ahemfem · 13/10/2024 16:40

I think a protest outside would have been fair enough and they should have left the insects out of it.

I agree about the insects, but why is it fair enough to protest outside a gathering of LGB people and their allies who want to discuss issues relevant to being LGB in the 2020s? Where are the protests outside gatherings of trans people and their allies? Where are the LGB people saying 'Hang on a minute, you can't meet without us!'

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.