You are technically correct, because it is within the current regulations.
What would you call the actions of an adult who has full capacity to read the now mounting evidence that shows very clearly that suppression of testosterone doesn’t remove male pubertal advantage, and who can read and listen to the now many voices saying this is unfair and indeed acknowledges that they hear those voices, but still enters sports where they have these advantages?
What do you call a male person who when they read articles written about themselves, reads the evidence presented by experts also mentioned in the article but continues enter sports where they have male pubertal advantages?
What do you call a male person who complains that they are excluded from the female changing rooms and given a separate room for their use, but still enters a sport competition meant to be just for female people?
Sure the regulations say it is possible? But you remove the agency of this male person to act with respect towards female athletes but declaring it is the regulations to blame.
If you could compete, by the regulations, in a race for children and claim positive fame and prize money, would you? What about if you could compete as someone able bodied but you could enter one of the disabled categories because of a legal loophole, would you?
And if you did either of these things, do you think anyone should celebrate your achievement? Or could we point out that you have morally cheated?