Prosecutions? don't make me laugh!! the enquiry actually makes prosecutions less likely, as the people concerned can now not have a "fair trial"
The whole thing has been designed to ensure no one ends up in court, hence the "failings go back decades" Lord Pickles (former housing sec) even complained to the enquiry that he had to be somewhere, so could they get on with it!! they also didn't even have the authority to demand witnesses attend, so many didn't, feigning illness.
There are 1000s of buildings all over the UK with this type of cladding, buildings that have known fire risks with people still living in them.
But the people in them, are in the main, poor and so it doesn't really matter, with Govt and the building industry arguing about who should pay.
Had this cladding only been used in private schools, it would have all been removed years ago.
Then there is the fact that even now, there are hardly any min standards for rented accomodation and the few that do exist, aren't enforced, with tenants too scared to complain.
Anyway, we digress.
Just as people don't want to admit that their coke and cannabis habit contributes to street level crime.