Me too.
There was also quarantine around those with measles then
No jab available then, so it was one of those things parents accepted their DC would have to go through, but it was still dreaded. It's so very infectious, it would sweep round a school but quarantine was attempted to protect those with younger DC (as it is worse in infants).
Parties were for German measles (less common once there was a job) and for chicken pox (a much less severe disease than measles, even though it's occasionally nasty). People didn't really bother for mumps, as it is less infectious.
The first measles jab rolled out in the late 60s - it was very effective (and still would be if it was made). It was not withdrawn because of any safety or effectiveness issues, but as a policy decision not to renew the licence (required admin every 5 or so years) because public health planners wanted MMR only.
The numbers of measles cases seem to be creeping inexorably up. Every year there are small clusters, but if one of those reaches a tipping point, the numbers shoot up (as happened in Wales a few years ago) and spread more readily to other areas (which didn't happen then, mercifully, but people were very concerned that it could).
Very young babies should have good maternal protection (assuming the mother has had either the disease or has been immunised with any version of the vaccine). but that wanes over the first year of life. That's why the jab is normally given around 12-13months. Before that it does not "take" as well, as the response might be a piggyback on remaining maternal immunity rather than the baby forming their own. That there is susceptibility in older babies (maternal protection worn off, but not yet scheduled for jab) is unimportant in a population where immunity is high (which these days means immunisation levels are high) as the disease isn't circulating. The herd protects those babies, who then get the jab at the age that doctors know it is overwhelmingly likely they will form their own (and durable) response.