Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Has the left now met the right, shaken hands with it then stuck 2 fingers up at the general population?

139 replies

Soloadventurer · 23/08/2024 19:11

Womens rights are an area the globe seems to struggle with. Afghanistan has decided women must be covered head to toe, including hands, in thick black fabric and cannot be allowed near men. Australia has decided men must be allowed in women's spaces or face being taken to court for large sums of money, making it all but illegal now to have women only spaces there. Why does the world hate women so much?

OP posts:
Helleofabore · 24/08/2024 18:03

ATenShun · 24/08/2024 17:50

So the NHS are saying it all wrong? Would it not be fair to say that if you are eg born with a womb and internal testes, you have both male and female sex organs?

That is exactly the scenario the female to male trans person I knew of had. The decision was made by her parents and dr's to bring christen and bring her up female. And like I said in that post, I can understand her now him feeling in the wrong body.

The presence of testes means that person is male. They were incorrectly registered as female at birth.

If their body progressed the testosterone produced by their testes, they would have gone through normal male puberty.

ATenShun · 24/08/2024 18:04

TheKeatingFive · 24/08/2024 18:00

This is basically an edge case of an edge case. Ridiculously rare. But still clear that even here, the body is only set up to make one kind of gamete.

1.7% of population worldwide born with intersex traits. Hardly rare.

ATenShun · 24/08/2024 18:05

Helleofabore · 24/08/2024 18:03

The presence of testes means that person is male. They were incorrectly registered as female at birth.

If their body progressed the testosterone produced by their testes, they would have gone through normal male puberty.

So the presence of a womb and no external genitalia meant nothing?

SensibleSigma · 24/08/2024 18:06

ATenShun · 24/08/2024 18:04

1.7% of population worldwide born with intersex traits. Hardly rare.

1.7 includes women with PCOS much to their disgust and men with tiny differences like a wonky foreskin or a hypospadius - things that need no treatment at all.

DSDs proper are rare. Despite how often they seem to appear in athletes.

TheKeatingFive · 24/08/2024 18:06

ATenShun · 24/08/2024 18:04

1.7% of population worldwide born with intersex traits. Hardly rare.

Nope. This is extremely misleading.

The specific condition you're describing is incredibly rare. The 1.7% refers to a wide range of DSDs, the vast majority of which there is absolutely zero ambiguity around what sex people are and definitely no 'mixed sex organs'

TheKeatingFive · 24/08/2024 18:07

ATenShun · 24/08/2024 18:05

So the presence of a womb and no external genitalia meant nothing?

It means a complex and rare DSD.

But the presence of a womb does not make someone female. A body set up to produce eggs does.

Helleofabore · 24/08/2024 18:10

ATenShun · 24/08/2024 18:05

So the presence of a womb and no external genitalia meant nothing?

It means that as an infant, the person was likely incorrectly identified as female.

The presence of testes is the only important body part for the correct sexing of that person.

It means the person deserves empathy but it is also important to correctly state their situation. Particularly if they went through male puberty because they had testes and processed testosterone.

They were not a ‘female to male’ trans person. They were a male person incorrectly registered as a female person.

Helleofabore · 24/08/2024 18:13

ATenShun · 24/08/2024 18:04

1.7% of population worldwide born with intersex traits. Hardly rare.

You really need to do research on this before posting so confidently.

The true figure is 0.018%

https://www.realityslaststand.com/p/intersex-is-not-as-common-as-red?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Intersex Is Not as Common as Red Hair

The claim that intersex people comprise 1.7% of the population is wildly inaccurate.

https://www.realityslaststand.com/p/intersex-is-not-as-common-as-red

ATenShun · 24/08/2024 18:27

I'll go by the NHS definition thank you. They don't seem to mention foreskin issues in their description. Todays Dr's have far more access to diagnostic tools that obviously weren't available 10 or 20 plus years ago. Being incorrectly sexed at birth (which is what I said in the original post on this topic) does happen.

Of course it is rare but not incredibly so. The percentage you quote as a fraction is 18 out of 1000. So in a town of say 50,000 people. There will be 90 with just that particular DSD.

Helleofabore · 24/08/2024 18:33

ATenShun · 24/08/2024 18:27

I'll go by the NHS definition thank you. They don't seem to mention foreskin issues in their description. Todays Dr's have far more access to diagnostic tools that obviously weren't available 10 or 20 plus years ago. Being incorrectly sexed at birth (which is what I said in the original post on this topic) does happen.

Of course it is rare but not incredibly so. The percentage you quote as a fraction is 18 out of 1000. So in a town of say 50,000 people. There will be 90 with just that particular DSD.

no. 9 in 50,000 births that may require further investigation to ascertain the correct sex category. Still, they are male or female by genotype. And a fraction of those might not experience any virilisation at puberty if they are male.

TheKeatingFive · 24/08/2024 18:35

ATenShun · 24/08/2024 18:27

I'll go by the NHS definition thank you. They don't seem to mention foreskin issues in their description. Todays Dr's have far more access to diagnostic tools that obviously weren't available 10 or 20 plus years ago. Being incorrectly sexed at birth (which is what I said in the original post on this topic) does happen.

Of course it is rare but not incredibly so. The percentage you quote as a fraction is 18 out of 1000. So in a town of say 50,000 people. There will be 90 with just that particular DSD.

Firstly, I think you have your maths wrong.

Secondly, no this figure does not refer to the simply DSD you are talking about. There are a number of DSDs where there is a degree of ambiguity about sexual organs at birth - that's what the 0.018% refers to. In the vast majority of those cases, this is easily diagnosed and clarified. The specific disorder you are talking about is much, much rarer than that.

SensibleSigma · 24/08/2024 18:39

Just checked, it’s one in 4,500 babies in the uk

Honestly I’m not sure why you’re making that the linchpin of your argument, as it’s very unusual and really not relevant. In the uk, the chances of anyone being raised as the wrong sex as a result of DSD are very slim.

Helleofabore · 24/08/2024 18:52

Being incorrectly sexed at birth (which is what I said in the original post on this topic) does happen”

That does not make them ‘trans’ of course. Of those with DSDs, it has been found that the incidence of having a transgender identity is similar as to the rest of the population.

A male person who was incorrectly registered as female at birth but now is living as a male person has not transitioned. They have chosen to live as their genotypical and likely phenotypical sex. They might choose any one of the other 130+ gender identities. But that move from incorrect registration of female to male is not them adopting a transgender identity as such.

popeydokey · 24/08/2024 19:40

ATenShun · 24/08/2024 18:27

I'll go by the NHS definition thank you. They don't seem to mention foreskin issues in their description. Todays Dr's have far more access to diagnostic tools that obviously weren't available 10 or 20 plus years ago. Being incorrectly sexed at birth (which is what I said in the original post on this topic) does happen.

Of course it is rare but not incredibly so. The percentage you quote as a fraction is 18 out of 1000. So in a town of say 50,000 people. There will be 90 with just that particular DSD.

Your link includes conditions which are specific to either males or females, like Klinefelters (which occurs in males).

Are men with Klinefelters in some way not male?

I'm not being snarky but I'm honestly not clear what your argument is about DSDs.

(Completely outside of the trans argument, obviously - I'm talking about sex, not gender).

New posts on this thread. Refresh page