Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To feel so upset about the government censorship?

750 replies

Utterlydisillusioned · 17/08/2024 20:12

This has just appeared in my news feed and I feel so upset and disillusioned. I was a labour voter, thinking we voted the bad guys out but I'm now really scared about what we've let in...what on earth have we done...? https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/08/17/education-secretary-bridget-phillipson-private-school-tax-r/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Lilimoon · 19/08/2024 10:45

@ChallahPlaiter thanks so much for your posts on this thread, they have been really useful among some of the bonkers stuff being spouted on here.

CurlewKate · 19/08/2024 10:48

@BIossomtoes "Landed gentry rioted? When?"

To be fair, they do play rugger......

SerendipityJane · 19/08/2024 10:52

Efacsen · 19/08/2024 10:38

English Civil War? tho' that's getting to be quite a while ago

er, point of order. It was the British civil war. Just ask anyone in Ireland.

ChallahPlaiter · 19/08/2024 11:10

Lilimoon · 19/08/2024 10:45

@ChallahPlaiter thanks so much for your posts on this thread, they have been really useful among some of the bonkers stuff being spouted on here.

Thank you

MadeleineMummy · 19/08/2024 11:17

jellycatandkittens · 19/08/2024 09:45

I think this is maddest response I've read on here. What on earth are you talking about?!

It is disgraceful that Starmer who has been in office for only 6 weeks with the majority of that time with Parliament in recess that Starmer as a dictator forced through the Tory Police, Crime, courts and Sentencing bill during the last parliament that introduced tougher sentencing for rioting. Then he allowed judges to implement these changes according to sentencing guidelines.

It does seem like 1984 when history is being rewritten as we speak to support an agenda.

pointythings · 19/08/2024 11:26

MadeleineMummy · 19/08/2024 11:17

It is disgraceful that Starmer who has been in office for only 6 weeks with the majority of that time with Parliament in recess that Starmer as a dictator forced through the Tory Police, Crime, courts and Sentencing bill during the last parliament that introduced tougher sentencing for rioting. Then he allowed judges to implement these changes according to sentencing guidelines.

It does seem like 1984 when history is being rewritten as we speak to support an agenda.

Well, he's not a dictator. We had a general election. Did you not notice that?

You're basically complaining that the law of the land is being followed with regard to the rioters. Tell us why you think they should not be in jail?

newnamethanks · 19/08/2024 11:30

Unhinged and ignorant barely begins to cover the degree of battiness on this thread. It's really quite concerning.

ChallahPlaiter · 19/08/2024 11:32

MadeleineMummy · 19/08/2024 11:17

It is disgraceful that Starmer who has been in office for only 6 weeks with the majority of that time with Parliament in recess that Starmer as a dictator forced through the Tory Police, Crime, courts and Sentencing bill during the last parliament that introduced tougher sentencing for rioting. Then he allowed judges to implement these changes according to sentencing guidelines.

It does seem like 1984 when history is being rewritten as we speak to support an agenda.

It feels like something when you hear publicly appointed officials such as Leaders of the Opposition described as dictators!
Pretty daft too. I’m currently in a country that actually was under dictatorial rule for decades and you really can’t compare UK democracy with all its faults to that.

DuncinToffee · 19/08/2024 11:32

I read MM's post as sarcasm, very subtle

newnamethanks · 19/08/2024 11:35

Hmm. Competition for Armando Ianucci maybe?

SerendipityJane · 19/08/2024 11:39

newnamethanks · 19/08/2024 11:30

Unhinged and ignorant barely begins to cover the degree of battiness on this thread. It's really quite concerning.

or amusing.

Andante57 · 19/08/2024 11:41

I’m not the same poster as @Andante67. Not sure if his/her choice was coincidence or deliberate - if deliberate not sure to what end.
Not that it really matters …..

newnamethanks · 19/08/2024 11:43

Fair enough MN, I've entirely missed the point. Apologies all. Back to sleep for me.

itsgettingweird · 19/08/2024 12:12

It is disgraceful that Starmer who has been in office for only 6 weeks with the majority of that time with Parliament in recess that Starmer as a dictator forced through the Tory Police, Crime, courts and Sentencing bill during the last parliament that introduced tougher sentencing for rioting. Then he allowed judges to implement these changes according to sentencing guidelines.

It does seem like 1984 when history is being rewritten as we speak to support an agenda.

😂😂😂😂

That's satire at its best when I had to read it twice just to make sure you aren't being serious 😂😂

pointythings · 19/08/2024 12:16

DuncinToffee · 19/08/2024 11:32

I read MM's post as sarcasm, very subtle

That hadn't occurred to me - sincere apologies if so intended, that's Olympic gold standard stuff.

jellycatandkittens · 19/08/2024 12:19

itsgettingweird · 19/08/2024 12:12

It is disgraceful that Starmer who has been in office for only 6 weeks with the majority of that time with Parliament in recess that Starmer as a dictator forced through the Tory Police, Crime, courts and Sentencing bill during the last parliament that introduced tougher sentencing for rioting. Then he allowed judges to implement these changes according to sentencing guidelines.

It does seem like 1984 when history is being rewritten as we speak to support an agenda.

😂😂😂😂

That's satire at its best when I had to read it twice just to make sure you aren't being serious 😂😂

@MadeleineMummy very clever. I do hope this is what you do for a living Smile

ChallahPlaiter · 19/08/2024 12:21

pointythings · 19/08/2024 12:16

That hadn't occurred to me - sincere apologies if so intended, that's Olympic gold standard stuff.

Gosh yes, quite 1984!

DuncinToffee · 19/08/2024 12:31

ChallahPlaiter · 19/08/2024 12:21

Gosh yes, quite 1984!

don't hyperventilate

passes the smelling salts

itsgettingweird · 19/08/2024 12:48

don't hyperventilate

passes the smelling salts

😂😂

I just love MN sometimes. Nothing better than a good discussion where people can debate calmly, throw in one liners and stand up and say "I'm sorry" for misunderstanding instead of going on a self defensive attack.

I miss the real MN sometimes. Or rather the Mn I joined all those years decades ago

ChallahPlaiter · 19/08/2024 12:50

DuncinToffee · 19/08/2024 12:31

don't hyperventilate

passes the smelling salts

😂

User8646382 · 19/08/2024 15:01

Zonder · 19/08/2024 09:33

This. It also annoys me that some schools are passing the entire cost onto parents. Because of the VAT status changes they are also going to save a wodge of money by being able to claim VAT back on some things but that's not getting taken into account or used to mitigate against higher fees.

This is true. The schools will be much much better off. That 20% makes a world of difference. The least they could do is lower the fees to meet parents halfway with the increase.

Merryoldgoat · 19/08/2024 16:11

User8646382 · 19/08/2024 15:01

This is true. The schools will be much much better off. That 20% makes a world of difference. The least they could do is lower the fees to meet parents halfway with the increase.

For most independent schools the most they can reclaim is 5% (as in net increase in costs 15%) as the vast majority of costs are not vatable - staffing, catering, transport being the main ones.

Most schools are planning to pass the 5% back but not all.

FYI I work in the sector in finance, am perfectly happy with the addition of VAT, and the schools that will find this challenging likely have other issues already and this is the straw that broke the camel’s back.

User8646382 · 19/08/2024 16:28

I own a nursery so know all about VAT that can’t be claimed back.

Most schools will save a fortune on agency staff alone. Catering costs can be, and usually are, outsourced. As are transport costs in many cases.

But apart from the day to day stuff, it’s things like building work where schools will be much better off. There’s a big difference between £10,000 and £12,000.

Merryoldgoat · 19/08/2024 16:37

User8646382 · 19/08/2024 16:28

I own a nursery so know all about VAT that can’t be claimed back.

Most schools will save a fortune on agency staff alone. Catering costs can be, and usually are, outsourced. As are transport costs in many cases.

But apart from the day to day stuff, it’s things like building work where schools will be much better off. There’s a big difference between £10,000 and £12,000.

Nurseries are not independent schools.

Catering is outsourced for many but the food costs are not vatable, the biggest catering providers in the sector only charge VAT on the management fees and sundries.

Transport that isn’t for hire or reward isn’t vatable outsourced or not - many schools use the transport for fixtures or ferrying to offsite sports grounds. No VAT.

Our total agency bill last year was £70k. Our salary bill is £4m.

I am for the VAT but schools will not be ‘much’ better off.

Marseillaise · 19/08/2024 16:40

MadeleineMummy · 19/08/2024 10:05

I think the upper class and the landed gentry have got much shorter sentences for rioting, although I cannot quote any facts but. know this as a fact based on what I know and read. I am not privy to the sentencing guidelines or have deliberated in any way concerning the facts and evidence in the cases. I also don’t know whether Starmer has interrupted his holiday to intervene in every single case and adjusted or implemented legislation after a few weeks in Parliament despite the summer recess. I blame Labour for impinging the right to protest in the Tories’ Police, crime, Police, sentencing and Courts bill, which they didn’t oppose effectively.

I am going to register my outrage at this government and want them to resign.

Seriously? That's not the experience of the rather middle class Just Stop Oil Protestors now experiencing His Majesty's hospitality - they unaccountably received longer sentences than most of the rioters.

Starmer hasn't intervened in any case, it's basically been a process between the police, prosecuting authorities and the courts.

What do you mean by "impinging"? The Tories had a massive majority when they passed that Act, what do you suggest Labour should have done to prevent it?