Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

JKR being uncharacteristically quiet

1000 replies

Jdugsgsgwyd · 17/08/2024 14:42

Anyone else noticed since the news that JKR is being sued by Imane Khelif she's been very quiet, unless I'm mistaken she's hasn't tweeted at all in about a week.

and hasn't responded at all to the legal action being taken against her. This is very unlike her, I'm thinking she's been advised by her lawyers to keep quiet. Anyone else think she might have put her foot in it this time?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
FlirtsWithRhinos · 17/08/2024 18:12

Tandora · 17/08/2024 18:02

Loving the gender criticals on this thread finally admitting that sex can be “assigned” or as some of them prefer to call it - “incorrectly observed” 😁.

Of course it can, in the case of DSDs. Which we know because the true sex can be shown using phsyical tests later in life.

What cannot be shown is that trans people (other than a trans person who also has the rare event of a DSD that leads to incorrect observation) are incorrectly observed at birth, because there is no physical basis to their belief that their sex is somehow "wrong". Their sex was correctly observed. They may well have feelings of gender that they believe do not align with their sex, but this does not mean the fact of their sex was wrongly observed. Gender and feelings are not the same as body sex.

Loving the genderists on this thread trying to pretend that thinking you should have been the opposite sex is the same thing as a physical test of body sex!

Tandora · 17/08/2024 18:13

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 17/08/2024 18:05

We are also noting the irony that individuals in the gender critical movement have put a lot of time and energy into deriding the suggestion that sex at birth can be mis-assigned

Show me when this has ever happened. Without using a trans identifying person.

I think what Beyond was saying is 'Show me a post on MN from a gender critical poster that accepts that someone who believes they are the opposite to their birth sex was mis-identified at birth'.

that someone who believes they are the opposite to their birth sex was mis-identified at birth

This is the experience for some people with DSDs . It’s not uncommon.

So come - do tell me GC folk of mumsnet - if:

  1. its possible to be both trans and have a DSD,

and 2) its possible that some people with DSDs have had their sex “incorrectly observed” at birth.
Do you acknowledge that some trans people therefore might logically be correct about their “true” sex and its wrong assignment?

NoWordForFluffy · 17/08/2024 18:14

FreedomDogs · 17/08/2024 17:53

He doesn't

What on earth gives you the confidence to declare that this person you don't know, whose doctor you are not, whose medical information you do not have access to, whose underwear you have not seen inside, definitely doesn't have a vulva? Can you genuinely not see that this is information that you do not know, and are simply making up?

Lord give me the confidence of a GC mumsnetter making statements about the genitals of total strangers.

Animated GIF

I must've dreamt all of the people asserting he has a vagina! 🤯😱

Tandora · 17/08/2024 18:16

FlirtsWithRhinos · 17/08/2024 18:12

Of course it can, in the case of DSDs. Which we know because the true sex can be shown using phsyical tests later in life.

What cannot be shown is that trans people (other than a trans person who also has the rare event of a DSD that leads to incorrect observation) are incorrectly observed at birth, because there is no physical basis to their belief that their sex is somehow "wrong". Their sex was correctly observed. They may well have feelings of gender that they believe do not align with their sex, but this does not mean the fact of their sex was wrongly observed. Gender and feelings are not the same as body sex.

Loving the genderists on this thread trying to pretend that thinking you should have been the opposite sex is the same thing as a physical test of body sex!

What cannot be shown is that transpeople (other than a trans person who also has the rare event of a DSD that leads to incorrect observation)

Oooo yes! Here we are ! Sooo some trans people might be right that their sex was incorrectly observed? If they also have a DSD?

Interestingly it’s only with recent medical technologies that most DSDs can be observed… I do wonder if there are other aspects of biological sex development that can’t be observed with current technologies that might be discovered in the future..

AncientAndModern1 · 17/08/2024 18:17

FreedomDogs · 17/08/2024 17:15

Do you also think it's impossible to identify a cave by standing at the entrance?

you think you can see into a baby’s vagina from looking at the outside of the body? The ignorance is pitiful.

vivainsomnia · 17/08/2024 18:19

What is so hard to understand here?
XY = male
XX = female

There's nothing to understand when it is incorrect.

It takes 1 minutes to Google and find the correct information, yet over and over posters assert the above, undermining those who challenge it, when they are the ones who are scientifically wrong.

FreedomDogs · 17/08/2024 18:19

spannasaurus · 17/08/2024 17:39

Do you really think that no one in Algeria knows what DSDs are? Maybe the general public are unaware but the medical professions will know what they are and I presume that government officials are capable of understanding what they are.

I mean, the good GC posters of mumsnet have devoted several threads now to discussing how Khelif must be a man who's lying about being a woman. Do I expect Algerian authorities to be more open minded? I really don't think it's a sure bet, no. The ultra-conservative position is very much that sex is binary and that binary cannot be crossed (isn't it funny how closely GC and ultra-conservative views tend to align? But don't worry, I'm sure it's a coincidence)

spannasaurus · 17/08/2024 18:21

FreedomDogs · 17/08/2024 18:10

So to you this person who has XY chromosomes but was able to carry a baby to term and give birth is a man? A man who just happened to carry a baby in his uterus and give birth through his vagina? To you, men can have vaginas, have uteruses, get pregnant and give birth? If this person said to you, with their vaginal birth baby cradled in their arms, breastfeeding, that they felt that they were a woman, you would tell them they were wrong and they were actually a man and it's simple and they're an idiot for thinking otherwise?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5885995/

I'm sorry but you have your head in the sand. You can make statements until you're blue in the face about how DSDs are simply about "incorrect" observations of sex at birth but reality will continue to prove itself more complicated than your "rules".

And because I know what argument you're going to come back with, yes I know DSDs like this are very rare, but that's irrelevant- the fact they exist at all disproves your argument. If your argument is always true except for one exception, then it isn't always true.

Someone with Swyers doesn't have a SRY gene (make male gene) which is why it's now considered a female DSD. Women with Swyers do not produce eggs so could only become pregnant using IVF. It's a rare condition and pregnancy is even rarer

AncientAndModern1 · 17/08/2024 18:24

Frankly IK’s genitals are an irrelevance as you don’t box with a vagina or penis. What is relevant is that IK’s body has been virllized via male puberty With all the unfair advantages this bestows. This process is the entire reason why sports are segregated by age and sex.

Tandora · 17/08/2024 18:24

Tandora · 17/08/2024 18:16

What cannot be shown is that transpeople (other than a trans person who also has the rare event of a DSD that leads to incorrect observation)

Oooo yes! Here we are ! Sooo some trans people might be right that their sex was incorrectly observed? If they also have a DSD?

Interestingly it’s only with recent medical technologies that most DSDs can be observed… I do wonder if there are other aspects of biological sex development that can’t be observed with current technologies that might be discovered in the future..

Edited

You must at least acknowledge that this might be possible given that this has been the case in the past…

So is it also conceivable that trans people might understand something about themselves that you don’t? That they might in fact be “correct” about who they really are, and you might be wrong, because you have “wrongly observed” their sex. Is that at least a logical possibility?

FreedomDogs · 17/08/2024 18:26

spannasaurus · 17/08/2024 18:21

Someone with Swyers doesn't have a SRY gene (make male gene) which is why it's now considered a female DSD. Women with Swyers do not produce eggs so could only become pregnant using IVF. It's a rare condition and pregnancy is even rarer

Edited

So what you're saying is Khelif could have XY chromosomes and still be female? Isn't that rather a major contradiction of every single other argument in favour of her being a man on this thread?

FreedomDogs · 17/08/2024 18:27

AncientAndModern1 · 17/08/2024 18:24

Frankly IK’s genitals are an irrelevance as you don’t box with a vagina or penis. What is relevant is that IK’s body has been virllized via male puberty With all the unfair advantages this bestows. This process is the entire reason why sports are segregated by age and sex.

Yet another person making up facts about Khelif's puberty. We do not know whether she had a "male" puberty. This is your assumption, not a fact.

Tandora · 17/08/2024 18:28

Tandora · 17/08/2024 18:13

that someone who believes they are the opposite to their birth sex was mis-identified at birth

This is the experience for some people with DSDs . It’s not uncommon.

So come - do tell me GC folk of mumsnet - if:

  1. its possible to be both trans and have a DSD,

and 2) its possible that some people with DSDs have had their sex “incorrectly observed” at birth.
Do you acknowledge that some trans people therefore might logically be correct about their “true” sex and its wrong assignment?

Starting to sound like sex isn’t quite so simple after all.. 🤔

spannasaurus · 17/08/2024 18:28

FreedomDogs · 17/08/2024 18:26

So what you're saying is Khelif could have XY chromosomes and still be female? Isn't that rather a major contradiction of every single other argument in favour of her being a man on this thread?

Male levels of testosterone rule out Swyers, virilisation rules out CAIS.

FreedomDogs · 17/08/2024 18:29

spannasaurus · 17/08/2024 18:28

Male levels of testosterone rule out Swyers, virilisation rules out CAIS.

The male levels of testosterone that we don't know that she has you mean? Even the IBA aren't claiming they checked her testosterone levels.

FreedomDogs · 17/08/2024 18:30

Also, can you define what you mean by virilisation? Is that your "sciencey" way of saying you think she looks like a man? How feminist of you.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 17/08/2024 18:30

FreedomDogs · 17/08/2024 18:10

So to you this person who has XY chromosomes but was able to carry a baby to term and give birth is a man? A man who just happened to carry a baby in his uterus and give birth through his vagina? To you, men can have vaginas, have uteruses, get pregnant and give birth? If this person said to you, with their vaginal birth baby cradled in their arms, breastfeeding, that they felt that they were a woman, you would tell them they were wrong and they were actually a man and it's simple and they're an idiot for thinking otherwise?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5885995/

I'm sorry but you have your head in the sand. You can make statements until you're blue in the face about how DSDs are simply about "incorrect" observations of sex at birth but reality will continue to prove itself more complicated than your "rules".

And because I know what argument you're going to come back with, yes I know DSDs like this are very rare, but that's irrelevant- the fact they exist at all disproves your argument. If your argument is always true except for one exception, then it isn't always true.

You will note I did not give the terms on which sex is defined. I did not, for example, mention chromosomes. Nor did I suggest the physical tests were simple, simply that it was possible to prove when sex is genuinely wrongly observed through physical tests, which is different to relying on self-professed identity.

The reason I did not got into details is precisely because I do know that there are vanishingly small edge cases like this one. I believe exactly 1 XY individual has gestated their own baby from their own ovum - this was a case of mosaicism. Another very small number of XY individuals with Sawyer syndrome have been able to gestate using donor eggs and significent medical support. These are cases where the DSD has caused an XY person to develop anatomy that is so close to female that to all intents and purposes they are female. Crucially, these people either do not produce testosterone or produce it but cannot utilise it.

IK, as I am sure you are aware, has tested with non-female levels of testosterone and exhibits androgenised features. IK therefore is not one of these edge cases.

I do not deny that the developmental pathways of the human body are complex and fascinating. This does not however mean that we cannot perfectly well corretly identify which people belong in women's boxing and which do not, any more than the fact that red and green both exist on the same spectrum means we cannot use traffic lights.

Tandora · 17/08/2024 18:30

spannasaurus · 17/08/2024 18:28

Male levels of testosterone rule out Swyers, virilisation rules out CAIS.

Her testosterone has not been tested. No one has any idea what her levels are.

DungareesAndTrombones · 17/08/2024 18:31

Off topic but I am reading a Robert Galbraith at the minute and it is AMAZING!!

viques · 17/08/2024 18:31

Viviennemary · 17/08/2024 14:58

Not before time. She is a total pain in the neck. Not surprised all the HP cast have more or less turned against her.

Ouch Vivienne Mary, you do punch hard below the belt don’t you? A few barely talented child “actors” that JKRs books and films gave enough money to so that fortunately they don’t have to worry about working at any job ( let alone proper acting) for the rest of their lives mouthing off because it was the woke thing to do. I can see why she would be so desperately upset and want to retire from public view and hold her wheesht for ever more.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 17/08/2024 18:33

I'm only persisting here for the lurkers.

Prominent trans people in the UK include:
Freddy McConnell - has given birth to two children
India Willoughby - fathered a son
Jan Morris - fathered five children

There are plenty more. There is no way round the biology when it comes to reproduction, which is the only reason mammals have biological sex. Nowadays we are fortunate that we can control whether we want to reproduce or not, and quite right too, but if a person decides to do it, they have to provide either a small gamete (in which case the person is male) or a large gamete (in which case they're female).

spannasaurus · 17/08/2024 18:33

Tandora · 17/08/2024 18:30

Her testosterone has not been tested. No one has any idea what her levels are.

Khelif,'s own coach said testosterone levels were high and they were taking steps to reduce it . No female would be required to reduce testosterone

DialSquare · 17/08/2024 18:34

Yes tandora, I agree with both your points 1 and 2 and always have.
What I don't agree with is that it's not uncommon, I think it's very rare. I also don't believe it should be used as a reason to allow males in female spaces and provision.

So now we've established that, do you think that IK might actually be Male with a DSD then? Seeing as sex can be incorrectly observed/assigned at birth?

viques · 17/08/2024 18:34

Tandora · 17/08/2024 18:30

Her testosterone has not been tested. No one has any idea what her levels are.

High enough that the female boxers unfortunate enough to be in a Spanish training camp with him had to be replaced with experienced male boxers because he beat the shit out of them.

BeyondOlympicLevelProcrastinator · 17/08/2024 18:35

Khelif,'s own coach said testosterone levels were high and they were taking steps to reduce it . No female would be required to reduce testosterone

Shh, we're ignoring that inconvenient fact!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.