Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Keir Starmer holds a lot of sway?

401 replies

TakemedowntoPotatoCity · 09/08/2024 18:14

Former Director of Public Prosecutions. Now PM.
Following the 'civil unrest' last week, several perpetrators have been not only arrested and jailed, but publicly named and shamed, the speed of which I have never seen before.
Our PM clearly knows the right people to get things rolling quickly.
This, combined with the anti racism protestors, gives me a glimmer of hope for the future. I feel in safe(ish) hands with Keir.AIBU?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
TooBigForMyBoots · 10/08/2024 17:48

hamstersarse · 10/08/2024 17:30

What lies have I told?

And cool, the definition of hate is "an intense dislike".

So are you happy that people can be arrested for having an "intense dislike" for things?

That nonsense about politicians ignoring immigration. They don't and they haven't. The Tory government talked about it endlessly and blamed it for loads of bad stuff happening in the country. Hence Brexit.🙄 At the same time, they cut Home Office processing and issued a fuck tonne of immigrant visas. And then there was their Rwanda "Deal".🙈 So they didn't ignore immigration.

In the run up to the election all the main political parties published their policies on immigration. It continues to be discussed now, post GE.

To say politicians have ignored immigration is a lie.

Also, and I'm not sure if it was you who said it so apologies if I'm wrong, people afraid of raising legitimate concerns about immigration for fear of being labelled "far right". Concerns about immigration were consistently in the top 5 voter priorities.

cardibach · 10/08/2024 17:48

2dogsandabudgie · 10/08/2024 16:52

A pp asked what Labour have done re the backlog of rape cases and you replied "set up 80 courts for rape cases" implying they had already done this which is why I asked if you had a link.

Not sure why you're getting so defensive.

I’m not being defensive. You’re quite aggressive though. And clearly gutted your lot of incompetents were finally rejected.

Julen7 · 10/08/2024 17:49

Bodeganights · 10/08/2024 17:19

He seems more like an exasperated head teacher to me.
I cannot stand the man.

This

2dogsandabudgie · 10/08/2024 17:55

cardibach · 10/08/2024 17:48

I’m not being defensive. You’re quite aggressive though. And clearly gutted your lot of incompetents were finally rejected.

Don't be daft, how can me asking you if you have a link for a statement you made be considered aggressive?

BIossomtoes · 10/08/2024 18:03

hamstersarse · 10/08/2024 17:20

But is it an incitement to violence?

That’s up to the court to decide unless she pleads guilty. It’s definitely provocative.

cardibach · 10/08/2024 18:04

2dogsandabudgie · 10/08/2024 17:55

Don't be daft, how can me asking you if you have a link for a statement you made be considered aggressive?

I didn’t say it was.

bombastix · 10/08/2024 18:09

The difference is on free speech is the medium. If I make racially charged remarks and suggest that all members of a political party should be burned while having a beer down the pub then not only is it unlikely I will be reported but the impact is low. Still horrible. Maybe someone tells me to leave or I get cheers. One remark, one night, forgotten.

But if I make racially charged remarks on line, suggest that people who belong to certain parties should be harmed, then I have no control over what I have said. It’s published on the internet. It will be there in some form perhaps forever.

The law in the first case might apply but there will be a need for witnesses. The second is a slam dunk in legal terms because no lawyer has to argue that it was said. And the context will be clear.

Social media technically publishes comments. But we all remain liable for them. It’s the same as it ever was, it’s just that we have come to expect that nothing happens because social media doesn’t police us. We have to do that.

swimsong · 10/08/2024 18:11

hamstersarse · 10/08/2024 16:06

The value people on here place on free speech is genuinely horrifying,

I just don’t think people have really thought about it.

Whats confusing is that people are calling anyone who objects to immigration ‘far right fascist’ yet there is literally nothing more fascist than censoring people’s speech, and the doing of this with glee and a casualness is the bit which is truly scary

There are literally many things that are a lot more fascist than inhibiting people's ability to incite and organise hate-filed violence against minorities.

Top of the list of course, would be the racist end game of such people - which historically has been herding naked adults and children into gas chambers.

2dogsandabudgie · 10/08/2024 18:26

cardibach · 10/08/2024 18:04

I didn’t say it was.

You're not making any sense now.

pointythings · 10/08/2024 18:34

hamstersarse · 10/08/2024 17:22

Or an Asda Store Manager with some of his people late to their shift on a Saturday morning having been on the lash the night before and not invited him

You see, these personal attacks on KS just make any political point you might make look less valid and more motivated by your own political bias. Play the ball, not the man.

swimsong · 10/08/2024 18:38

FolkestoneMassive · 10/08/2024 16:44

The ‘far right’ label is a deterrent. Deliberately used to create a climate of fear. It’s fascism in action: silence your political rivals.

The irony of this post is off the charts - and tbh, quite comical.

You're accusing democratic centrists of being fascist while whinging about 'far right' being used pejoratively.

Most far right people btw, proudly embrace their far right identity.

cardibach · 10/08/2024 18:42

2dogsandabudgie · 10/08/2024 18:26

You're not making any sense now.

Your general demeanour on this thread (and others) is pretty aggressive. You attack everything the government does or doesn’t do and take on any poster who points out your bias in quite a confrontational way.
Make more sense now?

Pinkstripepurplespot · 10/08/2024 18:53

hamstersarse · 10/08/2024 17:07

I think you will find, once you enable and encourage censorship by the government, you are very soon living in a totalitarian state. A bit worse than a few dickheads rioting.

On the weed thing, not sure what you mean, but I don't really have an opinion on weed other than I think we underestimate the impact it has on young people's brains.

We’ve had laws against inciting hatred for many a year. They made the statute books because they matter.

Are you a MAGA nut? Because surely it’s only those kinds of people who can’t understand the difference between freedom of speech and freedom from consequence.

Re weed - there was a lot of gnashing of teeth when the police decided not to bother prosecuting people for small amounts on their person. Because apparently ALL laws should be upheld.

ThisHangryPinkBalonz · 10/08/2024 18:59

oakleaffy · 10/08/2024 14:37

Hence “Two tier policing”

It does seem to be the case in some instances-

It should be scrupulously fair across the board.

A punch is a punch, after all.

100%

2dogsandabudgie · 10/08/2024 19:01

cardibach · 10/08/2024 18:42

Your general demeanour on this thread (and others) is pretty aggressive. You attack everything the government does or doesn’t do and take on any poster who points out your bias in quite a confrontational way.
Make more sense now?

Why are you so rude! What have I said that's aggressive. I don't swear, I don't name call, I don't say anything offensive.

If anything I find the staunch Labour supporters on here are the ones who are more aggressive, they're the ones who are the rudest. Honestly it's like being back in the playground on here being picked on by a group of bullies.

pointythings · 10/08/2024 19:08

2dogsandabudgie · 08/08/2024 21:18 Yes the meeting was this evening because everyone knows he doesn't work after 5pm on a Friday!

This kind of post from you is what makes people see you as aggressive. It doesn't address any issue of substance, it's just smearing a politician because your party lost the election. Personal attacks are a bad look.

SallyWD · 10/08/2024 19:09

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

cardibach · 10/08/2024 19:13

2dogsandabudgie · 10/08/2024 19:01

Why are you so rude! What have I said that's aggressive. I don't swear, I don't name call, I don't say anything offensive.

If anything I find the staunch Labour supporters on here are the ones who are more aggressive, they're the ones who are the rudest. Honestly it's like being back in the playground on here being picked on by a group of bullies.

Where have I been rude? Disagreeing with you and your approach isn’t rude.

1dayatatime · 10/08/2024 19:23

@swimsong
@FolkestoneMassive

"The ‘far right’ label is a deterrent. Deliberately used to create a climate of fear. It’s fascism in action: silence your political rivals."

Can someone actually please define fascism because different posters seem to have different views on what it is?

2dogsandabudgie · 10/08/2024 19:26

pointythings · 10/08/2024 19:08

2dogsandabudgie · 08/08/2024 21:18 Yes the meeting was this evening because everyone knows he doesn't work after 5pm on a Friday!

This kind of post from you is what makes people see you as aggressive. It doesn't address any issue of substance, it's just smearing a politician because your party lost the election. Personal attacks are a bad look.

There were loads of comments like mine on that thread so why you have decided to pick on me I'm not sure, but it smacks of bullying and trying to drive me off this thread.

2dogsandabudgie · 10/08/2024 19:28

pointythings · 10/08/2024 19:08

2dogsandabudgie · 08/08/2024 21:18 Yes the meeting was this evening because everyone knows he doesn't work after 5pm on a Friday!

This kind of post from you is what makes people see you as aggressive. It doesn't address any issue of substance, it's just smearing a politician because your party lost the election. Personal attacks are a bad look.

If that post makes me aggressive, not sure how, but that means there's been an awful lot of aggressive Labour supporters on here the last 14 years.

pointythings · 10/08/2024 19:43

2dogsandabudgie · 10/08/2024 19:26

There were loads of comments like mine on that thread so why you have decided to pick on me I'm not sure, but it smacks of bullying and trying to drive me off this thread.

There were, and anyone who comes on this thread and claims that those of us who approve of the government's handling of the riots is aggressive will get the be same comment from me. If you comment on policy rather than people, you will be taken seriously. If you persist in cheap slurs, you will be challenged, as will anyone else.

You aren't stupid. You know full well that KS works as hard as any Prime Minister, so one can only assume that a cheap shot is all you've got.

pointythings · 10/08/2024 19:45

2dogsandabudgie · 10/08/2024 19:28

If that post makes me aggressive, not sure how, but that means there's been an awful lot of aggressive Labour supporters on here the last 14 years.

Well, the last government was considerably less diligent and hardworking than the one we have now - remember Dominic Raab's 'The beach was closed' while Afghanistan burned? Boris Johnson not attending COBRA meetings (when KS cancelled his holiday to attend!). The contrast is stark, and people are allowed to point that out.

TaylorBrown · 10/08/2024 19:59

Safe is the last thing I feel.

Lonelycrab · 10/08/2024 20:11

Well, the last government was considerably less diligent and hardworking than the one we have now

The last govt was arguably the worst we have seen in a generation. Johnson caused so much damage (proroguing Parliament, establishing the distrust in the courts, police and establishments in general for his own personal gain and then blew it all because he was too busy getting pissed…way to go UK) and then came truss😫

Bar was set as low as it’s ever been and I hope as a country we never have to endure such an awful govt. It won’t be hard to be an improvement on that.

Swipe left for the next trending thread