Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Michael Jackson

536 replies

C4tintherug · 03/08/2024 12:00

Why has Michael Jackson not been cancelled?

I don’t understand why a musical has been made out of his music, and why his music is played at school discos and is still everywhere.

After I watched the documentary where the men described how he raped them, I won’t listen to his music at all, in fact, I feel a sense of disgust when it is played publicly.

I don’t understand why we seem to have cancelled everyone else except him. Is it because he died before he was officially found guilty?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
x2boys · 03/08/2024 13:51

Even if MJ was just a complete odd ball and everything was innocent
He certainly mentally abused those boys showering them with attention, money, affection ,building them up on a pedestal and then dropping them as soon as they reached adolescence .

Mirabai · 03/08/2024 13:52

lindsaybob · 03/08/2024 13:49

I used to feel very uncomfortable about listening to Michael Jackson’s music when he was still alive, because I believe the people who say he abused them and I didn’t want to support him in any way.

Now that he’s dead I don’t feel the same way about it because he isn’t around to benefit from any of the profits of his work. Anything that is made from his music now goes to his estate, which supports his children. Nothing he did was their fault and I’m sure they suffer too as a result of being associated with him, so I feel fine about them benefiting from his music.

Well his whole family benefit and so do Sony - so that’s really peculiar logic.

One of his sisters spoke out saying she believed the kids and talked about her own sexual abuse at the hands of her father, and she was rapidly shut down.

Summerose · 03/08/2024 13:53

Mirabai · 03/08/2024 13:41

It’s interesting that mothers, who are presumably super careful about paedophiles and what influences they expose their children to in real life, throw it all out of the window for a global superstar.

A global superstar with drug and alcohol problems who is on record as sharing his bed with boys. Whose bedroom contents itemised by the police included adult porn jumbled in with arty books of child and teenage nudes, even a child’s pyjama bottoms with blood on them.

Edited

It's widely known that NOTHING incriminating was found on MJ's computers. But let's not let the truth stand in the way of a juicy story.

Spidey66 · 03/08/2024 13:55

randoname · 03/08/2024 12:54

Gary Glitter
Rolf Harris
Huw Edwards
Jimmy Saville
R Kelly
Eric Gill (niche!)

70’s/ 80’s toptp is pretty much unbroadcastable.

And Ian Watkins

Mirabai · 03/08/2024 13:55

Hadjab · 03/08/2024 13:50

This is key for me. MJ may or may not have assaulted those boys, I honestly don’t know, and I’ve watched the documentaries, but why, why would you send your child to stay in house of a man that you basically do not know? I don’t care how famous he is, it’s just wrong. And this also goes for the parents of Usher, who allowed their child to live with Diddy.

IKR. Because he groomed the families of the boys as much as the boys themselves.

By the sound of it there are mothers on this thread who might make the same choice to send their kids to stay with a star they’re certain he’s innocent.

Fame does weird things to people.

Lilysgoneshopping · 03/08/2024 13:56

Simple reason: his music brings in too much money for it to cancelled

cupcaske123 · 03/08/2024 13:56

Hadjab · 03/08/2024 13:50

This is key for me. MJ may or may not have assaulted those boys, I honestly don’t know, and I’ve watched the documentaries, but why, why would you send your child to stay in house of a man that you basically do not know? I don’t care how famous he is, it’s just wrong. And this also goes for the parents of Usher, who allowed their child to live with Diddy.

Because Jackson was world renowned as being like a child. He was seen as innocent and asexual. He had a fairground. He was very childlike and people viewed his behaviour as innocent. He was seen as a Peter Pan who loved children.

Summerose · 03/08/2024 13:56

Thunder8090 · 03/08/2024 13:47

Those allegations were a pack of lies, he never laid a finger on those little guys

What a load of horseshit. Have you watched the documentary? How can you be so cocky sure of that?!

Did you watch the cross examination said documentary went through? ... Neither did I, because the documentary wasn't made in a court of law. To hold someone accountable, there should be fair representation from both sides.

Rummly · 03/08/2024 13:57

There was a fantastic thread on here a few years ago by a poster who was agitated about having a Rolf Harris record in a box in her attic.

No my love, wickedness does not seep out of the vinyl and take over your husband. 🤦‍♀️

Backscuttle · 03/08/2024 13:57

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Mirabai · 03/08/2024 13:57

Summerose · 03/08/2024 13:53

It's widely known that NOTHING incriminating was found on MJ's computers. But let's not let the truth stand in the way of a juicy story.

I have literally listed some of the police contents list from his bedroom. It’s clear you’re not even aware what that is.

What was found on his pc was adoption searches - looking for kids to adopt. Which was quite chilling in the context of adult porn and underage nudes.

Twistybranch · 03/08/2024 13:58

BeaRF75 · 03/08/2024 13:47

Frankly, I don't think it's good to "cancel" anyone. People are punished by the criminal justice system - there's no need for the rest of us to get on our moral high horse. But the quality of someone's output is obviously going to affect their legacy, purely in terms of the work. So, yes, most people would agree that Caravaggio was a better artist than Gary Glitter was a singer, ergo his work will endure longer.

Exactly, so Glitter should have written catchier tunes and then we could forget about all the child sexual abuse

Mirabai · 03/08/2024 13:59

cupcaske123 · 03/08/2024 13:56

Because Jackson was world renowned as being like a child. He was seen as innocent and asexual. He had a fairground. He was very childlike and people viewed his behaviour as innocent. He was seen as a Peter Pan who loved children.

Yeah because he created that image.

Mirabai · 03/08/2024 13:59

Lilysgoneshopping · 03/08/2024 13:56

Simple reason: his music brings in too much money for it to cancelled

Yep.

OnAndOnAndonAgain · 03/08/2024 13:59

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Keep telling yourself that

Abouttthat · 03/08/2024 14:02

Mirabai · 03/08/2024 13:35

It’s also funded ultimately, via a network of subsidiaries, by Sony,

The documentary didn't have an aire of "we ❤️ MJ" to it, nor was it full of superfans bigging him up. It just took the claims made in Finding Neverland and offered a different viewpoint, different evidence, and highlighted the media corruption surrounding it.

I'm going to watch it again as it's been a while to refresh my memory, but a lot of it did question some of the claims made, such as (I think it was the railway) hadn't been built yet. I'll re-watch it.

Deserthog · 03/08/2024 14:03

Mirabai · 03/08/2024 13:52

Well his whole family benefit and so do Sony - so that’s really peculiar logic.

One of his sisters spoke out saying she believed the kids and talked about her own sexual abuse at the hands of her father, and she was rapidly shut down.

Is the objection here that Sony and his family knew something happened ?

OnAndOnAndonAgain · 03/08/2024 14:03

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

What's wrong with you! 😒

LivingDeadGirlUK · 03/08/2024 14:04

Lilysgoneshopping · 03/08/2024 13:56

Simple reason: his music brings in too much money for it to cancelled

I agree, there is a lot of money at stake given the quality and length of MJ's musical career. Possibly also a lot of questions around how these kids were put in this situation in the first place. The BBC is being absolutely hammered regarding the access Saville had to kids under their watch, I'm sure there are quite a few uncomfortable people who were around MJ at the time that don't want similar questions directed at them.

SerafinasGoose · 03/08/2024 14:04

The material found at his Neverland ranch, as posted on the former thread linked above, shows unequivocally that he was guilty. In any event his interviews with Louis Theroux convey out of his own mouth his complete lack of boundaries and total want of understanding as to why this presented any kind of problem whatsoever. The very least you can say about him is that he was a danger to children.

He was also an exceptionally talented artist. Others before him in the twentieth-century canon - whether artistic, music, literary, etc. - also had dubious views: a lot of fascists in the early C20 for one, and proclivities back in the 80s - Bowie, Wyman et al - which are to say the least deeply problematic. One doesn't preclude the other. The work of the Lost Prophets and Gary Gutter has likely died the same death it otherwise would have done, because it was of a moment that's now passed and it simply wasn't very good.

There is a lot of commentary about Huw Edwards in the light of this week's news, and the fact that the 'nuance' of his multi-faceted persona somehow requires 'debate' (about what?) and dissection of whether it's possible to be a talented broadcast journalist and a paedophile (it is).

But what of that? News by its very nature is tomorrow's chip paper: it's not designed to endure (very fortunately, in a much-belated irony, for Edwards himself). Likewise, Max Clifford. Who remembers that name now?

The quality and nature/genre of the work is what endures.

dayswithaY · 03/08/2024 14:06

Because people would rather listen to Billie Jean than any old rubbish sung by Gary Glitter. It’s so much easier to cancel a naff Glam Rocker from the past, same as Savile, Rolf Harris and Stuart Hall. Who’s upset that they can’t watch those old creeps on TV anymore?

No one cares to listen to “Tie me kangaroo down sport” accompanied by a wobble board, no one is interested in watching a three legged race from a dumb 1970s game show.

But Jacko’s music is so catchy, let’s all go and watch the West End show and forget about how he fooled everyone.

Mirabai · 03/08/2024 14:06

Abouttthat · 03/08/2024 14:02

The documentary didn't have an aire of "we ❤️ MJ" to it, nor was it full of superfans bigging him up. It just took the claims made in Finding Neverland and offered a different viewpoint, different evidence, and highlighted the media corruption surrounding it.

I'm going to watch it again as it's been a while to refresh my memory, but a lot of it did question some of the claims made, such as (I think it was the railway) hadn't been built yet. I'll re-watch it.

The documentary itself is an example of media corruption. Sony is ultimately responsible for funding, at a distance, a documentary to protect their 3/4 billion investment in the MJ catalogue.

The railway station that supposedly wasn’t built is old hat - there were several stations built along the track at different times.

Mirabai · 03/08/2024 14:08

Deserthog · 03/08/2024 14:03

Is the objection here that Sony and his family knew something happened ?

As I said the objection is that Sony owns his catalogue. So it’s basically a piece of PR.

RoseUnder · 03/08/2024 14:08

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

People did talk about Savile - I used to work for a newspaper where the subeditors would correct spellings saying “it’s Savile with one L - because he’s going to one hell when he dies”. Everyone in the media knew.

Chatterboxy · 03/08/2024 14:10

Hairyfairy01 · 03/08/2024 12:21

Totally agree with you OP. If I hear his music on the radio I turn it off. I have no idea how a grown man who admitted to sharing a bed with young boys not related to him is still being celebrated and treated like a hero by some. Was amazed when this musical came out. You couldn't pay me to watch it.

Totally agree with you!