Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

There's absolutely nothing wrong with iPad at the table at a restaurant after a child centric day

636 replies

moomoomouseey · 02/08/2024 10:04

Imagine a day, filled with child friendly activities on holiday. Think beach, biking sandcastles, swimming together, pool, diving, playgrounds, reading books together, drawing, child centred show in the evening, fun fair, trampoline jumping.. etc etc..

At the end of all this, you go out for a meal. You bring crayons and paper etc and other toys, but after a while, your children are restless and bored but you want to enjoy your meal. You get out the iPads with headphones and let your kids watch for a bit/ play educational games, while you enjoy your meal in peace.

Some judgy judgerpants walks past and thinks you're a bad parent.

Kids are 2 and 4 or 3 and 5.

OP posts:
Sirzy · 03/08/2024 09:09

rookiemere · 03/08/2024 08:19

There's a difference between allowing a DC to have 30 minutes on an iPad at the end of a family meal, and letting them have it the minute you sit down.
I do think it's sad when the iPad or phone is whipped out at absolutely everything occasion such as travelling on a bus which DS used to love seeing everything go by, or memorably at the airport with a family going through security, where again I would have thought there was enough to distract any DC.

But sometimes it can be too much to distract someone and they end up in complete sensory overload. So if hiding from the world with a tablet means they can get though that bit of the trip with no meltdowns then good on them!

SwingTheMonkey · 03/08/2024 09:10

Theoldlife · 03/08/2024 09:05

Maybe they just don’t want to talk to your kids? Maybe they aren’t interested in them?

Equally maybe they have spent all day talking to their parents and have had enough?

When we go out one person does the entire order (the person sitting nearest to where the waiter is standing) because it’s easier for the staff to engage with one person than a load of people calling across the table etc- your kids would presumably think 99% of my family are incapable of ordering for themselves!

I’d bet pp’s kids don’t have a clue what’s going on at each table, actually. Because they don’t have kids themselves. I was an awful sanctimonious childless young person who noticed the things I’d never do if I had kids. Until I grew up and had my own family. Life isn’t quite as you imagine when you’re young and you’ve got the answers to just about everything. So for the pp with the observant teenage kids - just wait until they are parents. Perhaps they’ll be less judgmental.

Awumminnscotland · 03/08/2024 09:15

justread · 03/08/2024 06:59

I hate it when the SN card gets played.

I have 2 SN Dc. It isn't a free pass. There are still cultural expectations to sit down in a restaurant and engage. DS 1 recently came to a wedding as my +1. He found it a lot, but we muddled through. We also go to restaurants every now and again to practice, just for one course, but it helps him to cope with the different surroundings and making a decision (too many options causes him to shut down. This won't change magically as he ages if we don't start to get him used to it.)

Of course cultural expectations are able to be adapted for those who need it, but for the most part, the overwhelming majority of DC are capable of sitting down at a meal without a screen.

It's just that the parents are prioritizing their personal needs, and their want for their children to be quiet. And as long as the parents don't see any problem with that, (and accuse parents who do see a problem with it of being 'perfect parents' or make other snide remarks) then it will continue.

Yes. Agree with this. We've done similar with our girl over the years. With most social expectations, we have to be explicit and practice.
And yes, we still can't go out for a long meal prioritising our needs, but we never expected to, even before we understood additional needs were in the mix.

CocoDolphin · 03/08/2024 09:44

Theoldlife · 03/08/2024 09:05

Maybe they just don’t want to talk to your kids? Maybe they aren’t interested in them?

Equally maybe they have spent all day talking to their parents and have had enough?

When we go out one person does the entire order (the person sitting nearest to where the waiter is standing) because it’s easier for the staff to engage with one person than a load of people calling across the table etc- your kids would presumably think 99% of my family are incapable of ordering for themselves!

Oh whatever, make excuses all you like. Ever considered that it’s just rude not to acknowledge the person that’s serving you?

prescribingmum · 03/08/2024 09:46

SwingTheMonkey · 03/08/2024 08:59

Ah you missed out then. We did meals out lasting more than an hour when our kids were younger - sometimes they had screens and we had a bloody lovely evening. It still resulted in having young adults who are capable of sitting socially and interacting with their dinner companions so I guess you missed out? Don’t feel bad, some of us are just better parents and can get the same end result with their children without all the righteousness… 😊

I’ve missed out on nothing. We went out less but paid a babysitter and enjoyed longer meals without the DC for the short 3 years they were toddlers. We can now easily spend 2 hours in a restaurant with them socialising and no screen in sight.

The evidence on damage caused by screens is overwhelming, MH issues in children and teens are sky high and the association is clear. Once they are allowed screens for one occasion, it’s a slipper slope and too easy to become a regular habit for all occasions. I’m glad it’s worked out for your children and they socialise well but it’s a risk I’m not willing to take. If your children are already young adults, this evidence would not have been so apparent when they were young so I do wonder whether you would have made the same choices if they were toddlers today

JudgeBurrito · 03/08/2024 09:48

Screamingabdabz · 02/08/2024 20:58

The Anxious Generation - How the great rewiring of childhood is causing an epidemic of mental illness by Jonathan Haidt

Obviously haven't read the book, but this seems to suggest screens are bad for mental health which is the point I was making?

Haroldwilson · 03/08/2024 09:51

I mean, do what you have to do.

However if you plan a day that will exhaust your kids, personally I'd take them home and give them a quick pasta tea instead of the added stimulation of eating out.

In a hotel without a kitchen I'd get takeaway chips or sandwiches or something.

JudgeBurrito · 03/08/2024 09:53

OlympicsFanGirl · 02/08/2024 20:10

@JudgeBurrito

It's generally pretty clear if someone is using tech for a specific reason/need

Is it?

How can you tell?

Well PP said her son was disabled and used the iPad to communicate, so that would be pretty obvious. Of course you can't tell in all case (which is why I said 'generally'), but as an outsider you can generally tell when someone has additional needs as opposed to having lazy parents.

Theoldlife · 03/08/2024 09:59

CocoDolphin · 03/08/2024 09:44

Oh whatever, make excuses all you like. Ever considered that it’s just rude not to acknowledge the person that’s serving you?

No- as long as someone is taking to them politely and everyone says thank you when their food is brought and their plate is cleared, it isn’t remotely rude.

Waiting staff have enough to deal with without having to talk to every individual person in every party in the place- they don’t care, they want to get their job done with the least hassle.

Literally no one is interested in chatting to other people’s kids when they have 25 clears to cover.

And I don’t need to make excuses personally, my ds will chat to any old bugger- he is perfectly capable of ordering for himself… I just don’t see the point in making life harder for staff unnecessarily.

Breakfastatlunchtime · 03/08/2024 10:12

JudgeBurrito · 03/08/2024 09:53

Well PP said her son was disabled and used the iPad to communicate, so that would be pretty obvious. Of course you can't tell in all case (which is why I said 'generally'), but as an outsider you can generally tell when someone has additional needs as opposed to having lazy parents.

I think you have a very specific idea of how a person with SN presents @JudgeBurrito.

Very often it's not, in fact, 'generally obvious to outsiders'. Especially not to an outsider who is simply (and briefly) sharing a restaurant with a child on a device?

Sometimes it's not even obvious to insiders. My DC's teacher was surprised by their later diagnosis for example.

SwingTheMonkey · 03/08/2024 10:40

prescribingmum · 03/08/2024 09:46

I’ve missed out on nothing. We went out less but paid a babysitter and enjoyed longer meals without the DC for the short 3 years they were toddlers. We can now easily spend 2 hours in a restaurant with them socialising and no screen in sight.

The evidence on damage caused by screens is overwhelming, MH issues in children and teens are sky high and the association is clear. Once they are allowed screens for one occasion, it’s a slipper slope and too easy to become a regular habit for all occasions. I’m glad it’s worked out for your children and they socialise well but it’s a risk I’m not willing to take. If your children are already young adults, this evidence would not have been so apparent when they were young so I do wonder whether you would have made the same choices if they were toddlers today

I absolutely would. I can safely say that having short bursts of screen time occasion has done no harm. And it meant that me and my husband had the occasional meal out where we got to converse with each other. I don’t regret a thing. We’ve got kids anyone would be proud of - I’m entirely secure in my parenting to say I wouldn’t have changed that at all.

Glitterbomb123 · 03/08/2024 10:52

thefishingboatbobbingsea · 03/08/2024 08:01

Anyone who thinks they can 'train' a toddler to sit and wait in a restaurant without distractions whilst waiting for food is bonkers. They will as they get older. There's enough battles and struggles in life stop making things that are meant to be enjoyable for ALL (child included) so difficult.

Absolutely you can train toddlers to be patient in restaurants. It's called effective parenting. There are plenty of techniques you can employ to entertain your little one while they also learn that life isn't always filled with instant gratification and that sometimes patience and getting a bit bored are a normal part of social occasions/events.

People seem desperate to prevent their children from experiencing even a nano second of boredom - seemingly happy to accept bad behaviour if they as parents have failed to prevent this.! I would say the opposite. Kids need to be bored sometimes. It stimulates their imagination. It also teaches them that not everything is about them and their needs.

By making sure your children are forever entertained and stimulated by external factors such as iPads and phones , we are breeding a generation of children who believe this is a right and an entitlement.

But a restaurant where other people are trying to enjoy their meal isn't the time or place to 'train' them to be patient. As I said, my 7 year old will now wait. Whether that's a restaurant, queuing, waiting his turn. He's fine! But using screens when he was younger was easier for everyone.

You didn't train your toddler to sit and be patient, either they were naturally fairly placid and happy to sit still, or, like my child, they just learnt patience with age.

Comtesse · 03/08/2024 11:14

Personally I wouldn’t feel bad for a millisecond about the scenario.

mondaytosunday · 03/08/2024 11:16

My SIL said she was shamed when she was flying back from Australia and relied on iPads to entertain her three young kids at the airport. If ever there was a time it's when you have been up for almost 24 hours with kids who have been strapped in and then herded around an airport and are tired and bored but you have to sit and wait.
iPads weren't a thing for my kids (born in early 2000s) and no phones til secondary. I knew during those early years that eating out meant going early and not lingering - that's just the way it was. They were very well behaved but there is a limit.
I wouldn't think anything if I saw a kid on their iPad at a restaurant- not during the actual meal though. Afterwards if parents are enjoying coffee/dessert fine.

westcountrywoman · 03/08/2024 11:31

I disagree. I have teens. They were all perfectly capable as young children of sitting nicely at the table without screens to entertain them. It's bad table manners for a start.
Yes, the parents have to interact with them to keep them occupied but that's what happens when you have young children to parent. Whilst waiting for food to arrive we coloured together, played Uno / Dobble, did drawings etc.
Once the meal is finished, we left quite quickly before they got bored and my DH and I enjoyed a drink together once the kids were in bed.

Superhansrantowindsor · 03/08/2024 11:44

I don’t think it’s lazy parenting. I have nieces and nephews who are amazing parents but they do automatically reach for the tablet when we are out for family meals. I think they just do that because it’s what a lot of others do and perhaps aren’t familiar with the research that shows how damaging screens can be.

Renamedyetagain · 03/08/2024 11:46

Also disagree with screens at tables. Just gives the wrong message to kids. It's deeply antisocial and doesn't teach them that they need to converse, engage and interact with the world around them. It's also just lazy. And rude. So yes, I would silently judge.

I have three kids, late primary/early secondary. I know it's not easy...but that's life. We have the screen battle daily. But they know they will never win at the table. That's a time to talk.

I'm also a teacher and can spot the kids that have been brought up on screens a mile away as they have less social awareness, skills, manners and emotional intelligence.

Calliopespa · 03/08/2024 12:01

westcountrywoman · 03/08/2024 11:31

I disagree. I have teens. They were all perfectly capable as young children of sitting nicely at the table without screens to entertain them. It's bad table manners for a start.
Yes, the parents have to interact with them to keep them occupied but that's what happens when you have young children to parent. Whilst waiting for food to arrive we coloured together, played Uno / Dobble, did drawings etc.
Once the meal is finished, we left quite quickly before they got bored and my DH and I enjoyed a drink together once the kids were in bed.

But you are still just entertaining them in a way that falls short of sitting up and conversing quietly. I realise not all young dc will be capable of that but if I’m completely honest, I’d rather the guests at table beside us had their children on an iPad with headphones than had a game of dobble going on.

We are not huge users of iPads but our dc have either been either quiet ( happy just to doodle with a pencil) or young to join in the conversation appropriately. But I realise we have been fortunate in that regard and I think it’s silly denigrating a screen just because it’s a screen. There’s quite a lot of this attitude on MN. If you’re having to play card games it would be much more considerate to others to give them a screen. Do your training and non screen time in private.

westcountrywoman · 03/08/2024 12:18

@Calliopespa The key difference here is that we're interacting with our kids rather than letting tech babysit them. Obviously we wouldn't play a card game in a quiet restaurant and we kept the noise under control, but in somewhere like a Pizza Express where the background noise is significantly louder than a family of 4 playing a card game together I don't think it's an issue. We tended to colour and draw more than play cards anyway.
Once the kids were a bit older of course we expected them to sit and engage in conversation but when they're little, it's unrealistic to expect them to just chat away for ages whilst waiting and colouring / card games helped distract them for a few minutes until the food arrived.

Theoldlife · 03/08/2024 14:22

westcountrywoman · 03/08/2024 12:18

@Calliopespa The key difference here is that we're interacting with our kids rather than letting tech babysit them. Obviously we wouldn't play a card game in a quiet restaurant and we kept the noise under control, but in somewhere like a Pizza Express where the background noise is significantly louder than a family of 4 playing a card game together I don't think it's an issue. We tended to colour and draw more than play cards anyway.
Once the kids were a bit older of course we expected them to sit and engage in conversation but when they're little, it's unrealistic to expect them to just chat away for ages whilst waiting and colouring / card games helped distract them for a few minutes until the food arrived.

There are many hours in the day to interact with your children, they won’t be miss out from being allowed to zone out in a restaurant for half an hour every now and again.

Cheesecakelunch · 03/08/2024 14:28

Personally it's a no for me.

Electronic dummy / babysitter.

ThatOneUncomfortableEyelash · 03/08/2024 14:34

Judging by MN, families go to restaurants a hell of a lot more than they ever used to, so if it's more of a routine thing, I can totally understand the kids sometimes occupying themselves quietly on a tablet, in the same way I would sometimes read my book at the table at home.

I grew up in the 90s in a pretty comfortable middle-class family, probably not that different to the stereotypical MN family set-up, but we only went to restaurants maybe a few times a year. Even on holiday, we were usually camping and generally ate at the campsite. Cafés at supermarkets/garden centres/shopping centres/attractions were more frequent, probably a couple of times a month. It was a bit more of a novelty for me, and it probably felt like less of a nuisance having to behave myself for something that didn't happen very often.

SouthLondonMum22 · 03/08/2024 14:37

westcountrywoman · 03/08/2024 12:18

@Calliopespa The key difference here is that we're interacting with our kids rather than letting tech babysit them. Obviously we wouldn't play a card game in a quiet restaurant and we kept the noise under control, but in somewhere like a Pizza Express where the background noise is significantly louder than a family of 4 playing a card game together I don't think it's an issue. We tended to colour and draw more than play cards anyway.
Once the kids were a bit older of course we expected them to sit and engage in conversation but when they're little, it's unrealistic to expect them to just chat away for ages whilst waiting and colouring / card games helped distract them for a few minutes until the food arrived.

You can still interact with children when they are on the iPad.

It’s no different to colouring, especially since a child can sit there colouring with no interaction too.

Calliopespa · 03/08/2024 14:44

Theoldlife · 03/08/2024 14:22

There are many hours in the day to interact with your children, they won’t be miss out from being allowed to zone out in a restaurant for half an hour every now and again.

I think so too. Colouring is fine provided it isn’t accompanied by loud questions about “ what colour do I do the train? Muuuum there isn’t a skin colour crayon”; and if it’s Pizza Express you could probably get away with a quiet game of cards as it’s a family restaurant. But another aspect of good parenting besides interacting is teaching dc that the whole restaurant doesn’t need to revolve around them being parented to within an inch of everyone else’s tolerance because they are too precious to ever be exposed to 🧟‍♀️😱 a screen.

time2changeCharlieBrown · 03/08/2024 14:54

Absolutely genius thing to do! No way would i think it’s anything else 😂