6Laurahenry · Yesterday 21:45
Exactly , judging the situation from a short, clearly edited clip.
Please explain exactly how you know that the clip is edited and the process used to edit it it, so that it shows an innocent Policeman, who didn't kick a subdued man in the head and then stamp on him.
Does anyone remember the Kingsnorth Power Station protest, where Police claimed 70 Police were injuried, with the imputation that the protestors were violent? It turned out to be wasp stings, tripping over, wrenching his back opening a car door etc.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/dec/15/kingsnorth-climate-change-environment-police
Police were accused of using aggressive tactics, confiscating everything from toilet rolls and board games to generators and hammers. But ministers justified what they called the "proportionate" £5.9m cost of the operation, pointing out that 70 officers had been injured in the course of their duties.
But data obtained under the Freedom of Information Act puts a rather different slant on the nature of those injuries, disclosing that not one was sustained in clashes with demonstrators.
The Police lie, it's that simple. They say that they have body camera footage, why haven't the released it? Surely they want to prove their innocence?