Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be glad that the VAT on school fees

1000 replies

Shaketherombooga · 21/07/2024 15:01

Is now going to be happening in January? what’s the point in stalling it? I think it’s one of many decisions that we just need to get in with.

YABU - it’s SO unfair. Labour hates ‘strivers’ etc etc

YANBU - Yup, Labour said they are taking away tax breaks for private schools, so let’s get on with it.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
BallooningInTheSky · 21/07/2024 18:51

Tgjjl · 21/07/2024 18:43

You can be glad OP. But watch out - others might be glad when the government shits on you. Education is exempt. But Starmer likes a good bash of the "rich", as do thick voters who don't see the real inequality between state schools and other state schools. There are state schools sending around 80 kids a year to Oxbridge and there are others sending zero kids. Does state = state? My fat arse does it. The private school my ds just left sends fewer than 5 kids per year to Oxbridge. Why aren't you fighting to tax/replicate/get into the school that is sending 80 kids per year to Oxbridge?

If the OP is rich enough to afford private, then she/he may too experience some new financial challenges under a Labour government. The sooner the better hey, let’s get on with it!

LoremIpsumCici · 21/07/2024 18:52

Just realising the number of people genuinely worried that VAT would be charged before the ink is even dry on the law.

Every law has a an implementation period. 6 months is about the minimum.

So there is no way that they can pass it in January and make it enforceable in January.

The goal to pass the law in January 25 (get it on the books) means that compliance (actually paying VAT) can’t happen until the 25/26 school year at the earliest.

They’d not want to start it at the tail end of a fiscal year for taxes (5 Apr- 4 Apr) either.

GlutenfreeFast800 · 21/07/2024 18:52

@Meowzabubz is absolutely right. For the very wealthy you could double school fees and it would still be completely ok. This stupid policy will widen the gulf between the rich and the middle classes

Ohthatsjustalotofeffort · 21/07/2024 18:53

LoremIpsumCici · 21/07/2024 18:52

Just realising the number of people genuinely worried that VAT would be charged before the ink is even dry on the law.

Every law has a an implementation period. 6 months is about the minimum.

So there is no way that they can pass it in January and make it enforceable in January.

The goal to pass the law in January 25 (get it on the books) means that compliance (actually paying VAT) can’t happen until the 25/26 school year at the earliest.

They’d not want to start it at the tail end of a fiscal year for taxes (5 Apr- 4 Apr) either.

We were quite relieved to hear it in the kings speech this week as they could have tried to sneak it through as a tax emergency budget. By doing it this legal way- I wonder if labour don’t actually want it to go through but need to be seen to be doing something.

GlutenfreeFast800 · 21/07/2024 18:55

Hills Road is an exceptional sixth form. There are plenty of state school parents now panicking that their child won’t get a place (it’s selective) when the children with flawless GCSE grades apply from the (excellent) independent schools in Cambridge.

There will be state school children who will
miss out on Hills Road (and many others) now.

AzureAnt · 21/07/2024 18:55

GlutenfreeFast800 · 21/07/2024 18:49

@Shaketherombooga

I am SO far from being in the wealthiest 6% of the country. Two children in independent schools. Generous bursaries/scholarships.

I am SO SICK of people being horrible about the CHILDREN who are at independent schools. They are not all Hugos at Eton. (And you know what, maybe don’t give the Hugos a hard time anyway because - THEY’RE CHILDREN.)

Well done for saying that. There is some pretty nasty targeting of children of wealthier families on MN. If poorer children were targeted like this there would uproar. BTW Hugo is quite a popular name for "ordinary"children at the moment. There are 2 Hugos and my DGDs nursery, all ordinary kids with ordinary parents

Pottedpalm · 21/07/2024 18:56

LoremIpsumCici · 21/07/2024 15:49

Hah this is hilarious, do you know how many state schools are being closed due to too few pupils? Especially in London. This will help the entire education system.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68144986

overcrowding is a problem of the past.

Edited

Well we are not all in London. There is huge pressure on secondary schools in this area due to the huge swathes of housing being built around around town

Ciri · 21/07/2024 18:56

GlutenfreeFast800 · 21/07/2024 18:55

Hills Road is an exceptional sixth form. There are plenty of state school parents now panicking that their child won’t get a place (it’s selective) when the children with flawless GCSE grades apply from the (excellent) independent schools in Cambridge.

There will be state school children who will
miss out on Hills Road (and many others) now.

I expect a disproportionate number of the children at that school have parents who teach at the university and the children are intellectually way above average

SandandSky · 21/07/2024 18:57

I am really fucking bored of all the threads whinging about VAT on private education now

Ohthatsjustalotofeffort · 21/07/2024 18:59

ByWarmShark · 21/07/2024 18:10

I dunno, my son was suicidal after years of failing to get help in the state sector. I still worry about him every day, but since being in his tiny independent school I no longer have to get up the courage to check if he's dead each morning. It'll cost me more now, money I can't afford but will gladly find. I'm glad you enjoy gloating at my situation.

Im so sorry to hear this but glad he’s doing well at his new school- I would try and chat with the governors and head and ask them to either reduce his fees to make it the same or a payment plan of the 20% extra so you don’t experience hardship. They will have lots in a similar situation and will try and help where they can.

Charlie2121 · 21/07/2024 18:59

Jc2001 · 21/07/2024 17:55

Not paid they're fair share of tax 😁

Aside from this statement being total nonsense there is also another huge tax issue that is not discussed as much as it should be.

It costs me around 250k to send DS to private school for 14 years. To fund this I need to use nearly 500k of pre-tax income. This generates nearly 250k of income tax.

If I decide not to use private schools I will not be paying that additional 250k income tax. I’ll either put the full 500k into a pension and pay no tax or I’ll work less or retire earlier. Either way the Treasury will be 250k worse off plus will have to find 100k to fund a state place for my DS. It soon becomes a very expensive policy mistake.

LoremIpsumCici · 21/07/2024 19:00

Tgjjl · 21/07/2024 18:43

You can be glad OP. But watch out - others might be glad when the government shits on you. Education is exempt. But Starmer likes a good bash of the "rich", as do thick voters who don't see the real inequality between state schools and other state schools. There are state schools sending around 80 kids a year to Oxbridge and there are others sending zero kids. Does state = state? My fat arse does it. The private school my ds just left sends fewer than 5 kids per year to Oxbridge. Why aren't you fighting to tax/replicate/get into the school that is sending 80 kids per year to Oxbridge?

80 kids vs 5 kids out of how large an upper sixth in each school?

That’s the thing, state schools are massive compared to private schools.

UK wide, a privately educated child is still 9.6x more likely to get into Oxbridge than a state educated child.

SandandSky · 21/07/2024 19:00

GlutenfreeFast800 · 21/07/2024 18:55

Hills Road is an exceptional sixth form. There are plenty of state school parents now panicking that their child won’t get a place (it’s selective) when the children with flawless GCSE grades apply from the (excellent) independent schools in Cambridge.

There will be state school children who will
miss out on Hills Road (and many others) now.

If you can already afford to live in and send your kids to private school in Cambridge then you won’t be worrying about the VAT. Hills road has always been difficult to get into.

the real problem with Cambridge is the massive expansion of housing but not building on the already pretty shit healthcare/education provisions for anyone without millions in the bank

Tgjjl · 21/07/2024 19:00

My kids are young adults.

I'll be sure to advise them that when they set up home and consider having a family, that they need to buy their way into the catchment of an excellent state school.

This policy will increase inequality. And those without the ability to buy themselves into catchments will be hit the hardest. Stupid fuckwit Labour policies.

Charlie2121 · 21/07/2024 19:01

SandandSky · 21/07/2024 18:57

I am really fucking bored of all the threads whinging about VAT on private education now

Don’t read or comment on them then. Maybe when you are unfairly targeted by a different policy you’ll feel different.

Pottedpalm · 21/07/2024 19:01

LoremIpsumCici · 21/07/2024 15:54

All the teachers for all the children in school do exist.

There will be a proportionate movement of teachers from private to state schools following the pupils to balance things out.

Ha ha ha! Dream
on!

Frowningprovidence · 21/07/2024 19:01

If the point of the post is it's going to happen whatever and the only debate is around when rather than if. (Which does appear to be the reality.)

I think they may as well get on with it, people can join in the normal admission rounds for starting year R on 2025 or starting year 7 in 2025. The others can start their in-year transition process straight away if they can no longer afford fees
.

It's not much time for people to adjust, but then they should have got one terms fees vat free this coming academic year.

MummyJ12 · 21/07/2024 19:01

I think January is ambitious as consultation hasn’t even started. I can’t imagine it’s doable. Although I’m sure someone is going to come along with facts and figures to prove me wrong!
The chancellor has made a pledge of this not being implemented until at least September 2025 so it makes me wonder if this lot are to be trusted. (no matter whether you agree with this policy or not).

Era · 21/07/2024 19:01

A significant number of private schools have taken legal advice at the highest level and are mounting a challenge if it goes ahead.

There is also a large group who have taken legal advance on advance fee arrangements and implemented these accordingly.

Smartiepants79 · 21/07/2024 19:03

lemonmeringueno3 · 21/07/2024 15:12

There are plenty of available spaces in classrooms, lots of undersubscribed schools. They just might not be anyone's first choice. But those schools will certainly welcome additional pupils and the funding they bring.

There are not plenty of any kind of spaces near us.
This is very area dependent.

treasg · 21/07/2024 19:03

Aww @Shaketherombooga , I’m genuinely sorry you have a chip on your shoulder.

Sadly the vat won’t fix state schools. Like many, we’ll just pay it, but there’s many hard working people spending every last penny on the fees and your mentality has meant lots of children won’t get a good education now. Hope it makes you feel good though!

Ohthatsjustalotofeffort · 21/07/2024 19:03

Charlie2121 · 21/07/2024 18:59

Aside from this statement being total nonsense there is also another huge tax issue that is not discussed as much as it should be.

It costs me around 250k to send DS to private school for 14 years. To fund this I need to use nearly 500k of pre-tax income. This generates nearly 250k of income tax.

If I decide not to use private schools I will not be paying that additional 250k income tax. I’ll either put the full 500k into a pension and pay no tax or I’ll work less or retire earlier. Either way the Treasury will be 250k worse off plus will have to find 100k to fund a state place for my DS. It soon becomes a very expensive policy mistake.

Same as us! We aren’t going to just spend the money - it’ll be used to buy houses as rentals for our pensions, or we’ll put the money into our pensions. We won’t just be wafting it away into the economy on frivolous
spending! Personally as a family, the 20% increase will cost the taxpayers more for us as we will be using our state school places and we’ll be very considered with the money we are now saving so we can use it for our future.

LoremIpsumCici · 21/07/2024 19:03

Charlie2121 · 21/07/2024 18:59

Aside from this statement being total nonsense there is also another huge tax issue that is not discussed as much as it should be.

It costs me around 250k to send DS to private school for 14 years. To fund this I need to use nearly 500k of pre-tax income. This generates nearly 250k of income tax.

If I decide not to use private schools I will not be paying that additional 250k income tax. I’ll either put the full 500k into a pension and pay no tax or I’ll work less or retire earlier. Either way the Treasury will be 250k worse off plus will have to find 100k to fund a state place for my DS. It soon becomes a very expensive policy mistake.

I’ll either put the full 500k into a pension and pay no tax

Hows that? The annual limit on tax free pension savings is £60k.
https://www.gov.uk/tax-on-your-private-pension/annual-allowance

Hermione101 · 21/07/2024 19:04

Meowzabubz · 21/07/2024 15:08

Why?

It's not going to prevent people like me with plenty of money sending our children to private school. It's just going to prevent the families with children who need a bit more help and can fund it rather than overstretching the already overstretched school system from accessing it. Everybody misses out except for the already overprivileged kids like mine.

Same.

GlutenfreeFast800 · 21/07/2024 19:05

@Ciri which school? Hills Road? All the independent schools and the best state schools are stuffed with parents who work at the university and Addenbrookes. Not just Hills Road.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread