I am not anti-trans by any stretch.
I will address anyone as they would wish, and support their choice of name, pronoun, dress, and how they want to live their life.
And I think the issue has (a) been blown out of all proportion, given we are talking about tiny numbers, and (b) requires a more nuanced solution than most folks are willing to debate. All or nothing rarely solves anything.
I do understand folks legitimate concerns about safety, and protecting women’s spaces.
I will say this upfront. I believe folks born male have no place in female sports.
Language around women’s biology and healthcare should not be distorted to spare the feelings of a tiny few, who surely know they do, or do not have a cervix.
Many trans folk present very convincingly as feminine women.
Some not so much.
Most trans women are totally harmless and just want to live their lives, with respect, in line with the wider population.
A small minority are potentially dangerous, in line with the wider population.
And no, it’s not women’s responsibility to give up their single-sex spaces in order to solve where trans women go to the loo, or get changed, or access healthcare, or indeed go to prison.
HOWEVER it IS society’s issue to solve where trans women do these things.
No one could surely think it’s acceptable, or safe, for feminine trans women to have to use a men’s public toilet, or changing room. Men’s loos are dangerous places for these folk.
And it can’t be beyond us to find a practical solution, to what is for the most part a practical problem.
It would involve extra or neutral loos and changing rooms and hospital beds and money. And protection for women who want female-only healthcare professionals.
Can we learn examples from other countries, to see what works.
Some European bathrooms have shared hand-washing facilities for women and men, with adjacent but separate toilet areas. And some restrooms make no distinctions for gender at all.
We are in the end talking about practical things.
Surely we can find a practical solution.