I think the Rachel Dolezal (now known as Nkechi Diallo) is a useful ethical comparison just for discussion purposes (!) because she believed her identity was black and others felt she was fraudulent and effectively culturally appropriating the appearance of another race which she did not have the right to use in the marks of her identity.
Trans rights are a bit similar surely as they rest on a conflict of definition?
There are many trans people who share concerns about the areas of conflict of interest (sport and medical intervention with children) and also don't want to tell people what pronouns they need to use.
None of this is as simple as it's presented.
I would want a long term positive open discussion about how everyone can be best accomodated.
I think most people agree there are some men who say they're trans who prove the need to discuss, at the very least, separate birth origin sex spaces.
The numbers of sexually abusuve men is not small - this is why we need to protect all vulnerable people from them - the way we've always done it is with separate spaces - no one has told me how you distinguish between a genuine trans woman and a sexually predatory man. This is the crux of it to me.
I don't want to harm the lovely trans people I know. But what do you do to protect women?
Also no one talks about Muslim women and how separate sex spaces are hugely important. Changing this has a huge impact and no one talks about it that I ever hear.