Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To say a massive well done to the people of France...

553 replies

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 07/07/2024 19:33

For telling the far right National Rally to fuck off to the far side of fuck!!!

So relieved!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Triestre · 07/07/2024 21:02

onstarboardquarter · 07/07/2024 20:59

Unfortunately, i don’t think it’s as simple as all far right voters being racists and fascists. The picture is more nuanced than that, it may be about historic treatment (class, economic, etc.) and feelings of grievance that are ‘managed’ by politicians such as Farage, who may seem to offer an answer to it all. Same goes for the far left, look at Chavez, who admitted to keeping the working class poor - he was incredibly popular in his day.

Chavez was not only incredible popular. Voting for him destroyed the country. Venezuelans only voted once and pretty much since it has been a dictatorship. 26 years later and still those fuckers are in power. Corbyn adorable friends 🤮

rumnraisins · 07/07/2024 21:03

RationalityIsHard · 07/07/2024 21:01

The only ignorant myth I can see is the tired old one that the Nazis were somehow left wing because they happened to have socialist in their name.

As I said to someone else, I haven’t actually used the name as an argument, so save your straw man argument for someone who knows less about history.

paperrocksiscissors · 07/07/2024 21:05

youvebeenthanked · 07/07/2024 20:43

Meloni of Italy and Le Pen of France are right (and too right for me, personally) but really nothing like the Nazi party of ww2. Le Pen has stated in relation to immigration that she is against letting immigrants who commit crimes stay in the country, so this is quite different from being anti all immigration. NB France has seen more extreme terrorism than the UK - beheaded teachers. But the stated aims of Hitler from mein kampf right up to 1945 were lebensraum - taking land space to the East and killing the slavs who lived there, defeating Bolsheviks, and seeking a solution to the Jewish question and other minorties, disabled people, etc - this really is a far cry from modern day "right"

Le Pen was also gaining traction as she was seen as not likely to agree to send soldiers to Ukraine and I think more anti war, pro negotiation. France and other EU countries have seen far more anti war demonstrations than in the UK, from people who want humanitarian aid for all civilians, not military aid.

On the other hand, her party did not have admin experience and this was seen as a risk and the unknowns were a risk and at the end of the day, it was too "right" for most people, probably.

Macron was re-elected in 2022 as president but has not have a majority in parliament and there have been external pressures over the last two years and financial pressure since covid probably, the health service now is not the same as it was before covid. I think Macron did really well through covid, the environmental policies in France are better, the social net in France is better. It is really very different from the UK. I guess we will have to wait and see how things go from now.

Edited

You judge the standards of 1933 Hitler as a benchmark for far right n 2024??

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/italy-giorgia-meloni-brothers-of-italy-youth-fascist-salutes-video-rcna160108

Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni tells her party there's no room for fascism in its ranks

An undercover media investigation last week released a video of members of her party’s youth wing making fascist salutes and chanting “Sieg Heil.”

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/italy-giorgia-meloni-brothers-of-italy-youth-fascist-salutes-video-rcna160108

Auvergne63 · 07/07/2024 21:06

Okki · 07/07/2024 20:17

Well it's all a bit shit for France really. 3 years of nothing to come. A parliament made up of far right and left with a centrist (almost) President. No one is going to agree on anything.

It is what democracy is about. Every view should be represented. Every vote should count.

Abhannmor · 07/07/2024 21:07

rumnraisins · 07/07/2024 20:58

Ah, the usual half truths.

Just read Mein Kampf and The Communist Manifesto and see for yourself what the two have in common (hint: a s _ m)

Marx was a Jew and a massive anti-Semite. Strange but true.

The burning of his books is a good example of the revolution eating its own children. All of them do.

The nazis started as Marxists and once Jews were singled out as the group responsible for the Germany’s demise, the eugenics followed, in line with the ideas of that period - eugenics was massive then and Hitler read a lot of it.

(Marie Stopes also loved it, in case you support Plant Parenthood…;)

And the idea was born of the Jews corrupting the German nation (back then nations were referred to as ‘race’) both on economic and biological level. We all know what followed.

Whether it’s nazism, fascism or communism really only depends on which class of people you pick as the enemy and what means you choose to get rid of them. The singling out and hatred are the same, whether it’s Hitler, Stalin or Mao.

Edited

Oh dear. Now if I were you I'd stick to the raisins and lay off the rum.

I bet the people of France are looking forward to a few years of boring compromise and relative stability. Rather like the Brits. Two good results.

youvebeenthanked · 07/07/2024 21:08

paperrocksiscissors · 07/07/2024 20:41

Historian here (well BA Hons in History ) I have a problem with the sweeping statement far left have killed more than far right.

As a direct result of Hitlers aggression, World War 2 kicked off which killed over 75 million people, your graph only shows those killed by death camps.

Further, I think its rather silly statement when religious wars and intolerance has killed FAR MORE than any political ideas.

It was the Soviet Union who defeated the Nazis in ww2. Compare the losses of 10.7 million soviet soldiers and 12.4 million soviet civilians in ww2 with the UK/US figures which were in the thousands, not millions.

rumnraisins · 07/07/2024 21:08

Fupalover · 07/07/2024 20:36

Indeed. The far right might not be in power but it has a hell of a lot of people with those views.

If there are more A voters than B voters then unless A wins and is in power, you don’t live in a representative democracy.

rumnraisins · 07/07/2024 21:09

Abhannmor · 07/07/2024 21:07

Oh dear. Now if I were you I'd stick to the raisins and lay off the rum.

I bet the people of France are looking forward to a few years of boring compromise and relative stability. Rather like the Brits. Two good results.

It’s not going to be boring and will be far from stability.

No need to patronise me either.

Bloom15 · 07/07/2024 21:10

Thank fuck for that!

Watercoloursky · 07/07/2024 21:11

Propertyshmoperty · 07/07/2024 20:19

Oh give over, I hate this reframing the far right as "they were really left wing because the party was called the national socialist party" they literally put communists and socialists in death camps.

"First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me"

Fully agree. The name was a cynical attempt to appeal to as many as possible, it wasn't a socialist party any more than North Korea is a 'Democratic People's Republic'.

user1471453601 · 07/07/2024 21:16

I'm having a bit of a Labre sifre moment.

the higher you build your barricades
the taller I become.
the further you take my rights away
the faster I will run.

So, fuck you both Farage and Le Penn. Cos, something inside so strong. And your evil words cannot take this feeling away, however hard you try.

I'm in my 70s now, I never had to face the Nazis like the generation before me, but I recognise them when they come calling.

viva last france, and thank you uk.

RationalityIsHard · 07/07/2024 21:18

rumnraisins · 07/07/2024 21:03

As I said to someone else, I haven’t actually used the name as an argument, so save your straw man argument for someone who knows less about history.

Edited

So you don't think the Nazis were left wing then? Phew, because that would be really silly, especially from someone who knows lots about history.

Lifeomars · 07/07/2024 21:18

So relieved, the French system seems really sensible in that it gives people that vital second round to look at what could lie ahead and change their minds. There will of course always be people with very right wing views. , I think governments and wider society always need to be aware of this and to work hard at minimising the conditions in which they thrive such as poverty, deprivation, and poor education. When people feel marginalised, ignored and have little hope of a better future there is a chance that they can be persuaded to support far right causes. It is no coincidence that Reform has won seats in areas with high levels of economic and social deprivation. Farage and Tice are very aware of where the wins can be found.

onstarboardquarter · 07/07/2024 21:18

Triestre · 07/07/2024 21:02

Chavez was not only incredible popular. Voting for him destroyed the country. Venezuelans only voted once and pretty much since it has been a dictatorship. 26 years later and still those fuckers are in power. Corbyn adorable friends 🤮

Yes, I agree his dictatorship was corrupt and terrible but that doesn’t mean he wasn’t a populist that gained the people’s vote on at least one of the four elections. That was my point exactly - it can go bad to the left or right but that does not negate the power of populism for those who have a grievance. It is not always the disadvantaged, but often is.

Bagganuts · 07/07/2024 21:23

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

CreateUserNames · 07/07/2024 21:30

Fupalover · 07/07/2024 20:36

Indeed. The far right might not be in power but it has a hell of a lot of people with those views.

Yes labour needs to be careful not to push people too much otherwise there will come a tipping point. Half of the voters’ needs def worth listening to.

Dorisbonson · 07/07/2024 21:30

Watercoloursky · 07/07/2024 21:11

Fully agree. The name was a cynical attempt to appeal to as many as possible, it wasn't a socialist party any more than North Korea is a 'Democratic People's Republic'.

Communists and National Socialist (Fascist/Nazi) both controlled the economy, had big state policies, redistribution of state resources, command and control economies, reduced individual liberty and had death and torture camps. I don't see how you distinguish between them based on what you have said?

How do you classify Farage wanting small state low tax policies as similar to either of those? How is a smaller state with lower taxes and fewer resources going to repress people?

The whole left wing/right wing thing makes no sense.

Lots of socialists don't like immigration. Are they right wing?Communists/Socialists/Fascists (call them whatever you want) all want greater levels of state intervention and control and believe in using big state policies and higher level of taxes to deliver whatever crazy utopia they have in mind.

Your right/wing left wing labels belong in the bin.

Dorisbonson · 07/07/2024 21:32

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Does that start with people throwing around phrases like "far right" to allude to that without saying it?

ClawedUkelele · 07/07/2024 21:36

I don't believe that everyone who is voting for far right parties is doing so because they're racist. Many are people who are seeing two things (A) deteriorating living standards, and (B) high immigration, and they think that B is causing A.

High immigration, though, is a result of deteriorating living standards more than it is a cause. When people are feeling the pinch, they have smaller families. Birth rates in the UK and France are so low that immigration is being increasingly used to prop up our societies (otherwise, an increasingly small working-age population would be required to prop up an increasingly large retirement age population).

The Far Right parties, though, tend to espouse the sort of economic policies that have led to widespread poverty and poorly-distributed wealth in the first place. Reform's platform is basically modern Thatcherism, which is what pushed most of the poorer areas of the UK (now voting Reform) into poverty.

I do fear that centrism is not going to solve the underlying problems that create openings for the likes of Farage. If a left of centre government can lift the living standards of workers, that might go a long way to dampening the recent rise in Far Right politics.

LlynTegid · 07/07/2024 21:37

TheGander · 07/07/2024 21:01

May I say a Massive Well Done to anyone who understands the french electoral system. I find it utterly baffling and I am a fluent French speaker.

I won't test you on the Belgian one then. The Duckworth-Lewis method is probably simpler.

BeenThere0 · 07/07/2024 21:42

To French speakers here: What's the best translation into French of the term "hung parliament"? (Of course it's not the literal 'parlement suspendu'!) Thanks

rumnraisins · 07/07/2024 21:43

RationalityIsHard · 07/07/2024 21:18

So you don't think the Nazis were left wing then? Phew, because that would be really silly, especially from someone who knows lots about history.

Reimann in his book about the realities of nazi Germany quotes a letter from a German business owner to his counterpart in the US:

The difference between this and the Russian system is much less than you think, despite the fact that officially we are still independent businessmen.

Some businessmen have even started studying Marxist theories, so that they will have a better understanding of the present economic system.

Let’s see why a German businessman in 1930s Germany would be inclined to speak about Marxism:

  1. abolition of private property (1933)
  2. reorganising industry into 13 massive subgroups each directly under government control via appointed commissars
  3. removal of private companies board members and replacin them with party members
  4. seizing business of non-compliant citizens into state ownership
  5. artificially setting prices of both consumer and wholesale goods
  6. shielding farmland earmarked for Lebensraum from debt accrued during business operations (in effect exempting them from market forces and leading to the demise of the creditors)
  7. production control in agriculture and price setting
  8. price commissars being appointed to interfere with price setting for private transactions
  9. I could go on but let’s stop here

This happened in early 1930s, as soon as they got into power.

Sources:

  1. Peter Temin, ‘Soviet and Nazi Economic Planning in the 1930s’
  2. Gunter Reimann ‘The Vampire Economy’

But I guess you know best.

Gape · 07/07/2024 21:45

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

RationalityIsHard · 07/07/2024 21:45

rumnraisins · 07/07/2024 21:43

Reimann in his book about the realities of nazi Germany quotes a letter from a German business owner to his counterpart in the US:

The difference between this and the Russian system is much less than you think, despite the fact that officially we are still independent businessmen.

Some businessmen have even started studying Marxist theories, so that they will have a better understanding of the present economic system.

Let’s see why a German businessman in 1930s Germany would be inclined to speak about Marxism:

  1. abolition of private property (1933)
  2. reorganising industry into 13 massive subgroups each directly under government control via appointed commissars
  3. removal of private companies board members and replacin them with party members
  4. seizing business of non-compliant citizens into state ownership
  5. artificially setting prices of both consumer and wholesale goods
  6. shielding farmland earmarked for Lebensraum from debt accrued during business operations (in effect exempting them from market forces and leading to the demise of the creditors)
  7. production control in agriculture and price setting
  8. price commissars being appointed to interfere with price setting for private transactions
  9. I could go on but let’s stop here

This happened in early 1930s, as soon as they got into power.

Sources:

  1. Peter Temin, ‘Soviet and Nazi Economic Planning in the 1930s’
  2. Gunter Reimann ‘The Vampire Economy’

But I guess you know best.

Edited

Clearly I do.

wagram · 07/07/2024 21:47

@BeenThere0 No majority parliament.

Swipe left for the next trending thread