Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Farage is leader of the opposition

257 replies

Aladdinzane · 14/06/2024 15:04

https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/general-election-live-updates-reform-labour-tories-3110227

Farage is claiming he is the de facto leader of the opposition and that he should get a head to head debate with Starmer. His party currently holds no seats.

What do you think?

Is someone positioning himself for something after the election?

Farage calls for spot on BBC debate as 'leader of the opposition' after poll boost

The Reform leader said a YouGov poll showing his party ahead of the Tories means he should be on next week's leaders' debate

https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/general-election-live-updates-reform-labour-tories-3110227

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Floogal · 15/06/2024 00:10

He's so much like Alan Partridge.

TempestTost · 15/06/2024 00:52

There has to be some kind of bar or guideline for who gets to participate in election debates, and it makes sense that it is parties who have a certain number of MPs.

it is an interesting situation though where a party with none is looking like they could end up being official opposition, or I suppose theoretically even the government.

My thought is that where that is the case, it's better for the public to see the leaders debate. But I don't know quite what the mechanism would be to decide when that should happen. It would be to the advantage of the other parties to leave out contenders so it probably shouldn't be up to them.

Whether people like the leaders or not, or whether they are twits, isn't really relevant imo.

LazyGewl · 15/06/2024 01:43

CountryBear · 14/06/2024 21:08

I like Nigel Farage and I’m glad there’s someone keeping the country from going too far left.

I would describe myself as centre right. I believe in work that pays; accountability for your own choices; taxes used appropriately and I am not interested in becoming poor in order to reach net zero sooner. I am concerned about the ‘open boarder’ policies of some of the other parties, we need skilled immigration, but not unskilled. I do not enjoy having other peoples ideologies shoved down my throat, although I tend to have a live and let live approach to life. I don’t judge others even though I might not agree. Although I do believe in women only spaces.

I consider myself to be ‘normal’, hard working and I’m pleased that Nigel is adding balance to some of the other parties, preventing them from going too far with some of their policies and ideas.

I appreciate that labour is going to get into power, I think they are useless, although they can’t be any worse than the Tories have been. I hope that Nigel can be an opposing voice in the next government standing up for us who perhaps aren’t as progressive, and there are many of us.

I refuse to call other people names or insult them based on who they vote for. I believe in tolerance towards all, except when it’s harmful e.g. those important women’s spaces.

Anyway, I’m a secondary teacher in her early 40’s and I will be voting for reform. It’ll be a first, but I feel it’s the right decision for me.

Nobody cares who you’re voting for

Summerfreezemakesmedrinkwine · 15/06/2024 07:43

Speak for yourself, I care. Everyone should care when people are so disaffected with the status quo that a protest party has their vote, especially when they are gaining in popularity as we move towards the g.e.

PrincessTeaSet · 15/06/2024 07:53

TempestTost · 15/06/2024 00:52

There has to be some kind of bar or guideline for who gets to participate in election debates, and it makes sense that it is parties who have a certain number of MPs.

it is an interesting situation though where a party with none is looking like they could end up being official opposition, or I suppose theoretically even the government.

My thought is that where that is the case, it's better for the public to see the leaders debate. But I don't know quite what the mechanism would be to decide when that should happen. It would be to the advantage of the other parties to leave out contenders so it probably shouldn't be up to them.

Whether people like the leaders or not, or whether they are twits, isn't really relevant imo.

Reform won't be the official opposition as they won't have enough MPs. They won't have enough people to put up MPs in most constituencies.

The opposition is the party with the second greatest number of MPs. It's nothing to do with vote share.

It's scary that people don't understand the basics of how our democracy works and just believe whatever comes out of NF's mouth.

EatCrow · 15/06/2024 07:56

He’s just a third wheel puppet used to make people believe there’s more choice.

Churchview · 15/06/2024 09:31

I am concerned about the ‘open boarder’ policies of some of the other parties

Does @CountryBear the 'secondary teacher in her early forties'(????) who posted this above knows something about boarding school VAT that we don't.

ExpressCheckout · 15/06/2024 09:55

Brilliant interview on PM on Radio 4 yesterday (Friday). The interviewer asked a polling expert whether the media frenzy around Farage actually increased support for him. Pricking her London Media Bubble, the expert reminded the interviewer that people who support Reform/Farage were very unlikely to listen to Radio 4 😂

fliptopbin · 15/06/2024 09:55

Have sll of the people going on about proportional representation forgotten that we had s referendum on this,and hardly anybody voted.

PrincessTeaSet · 15/06/2024 10:00

MeanGreen · 14/06/2024 18:43

They have a working contract (just had a look).

To be honest it doesn’t read as “we hate foreigners “, it addresses stuff that has just been fudged around in the last few years.

Like I said, if there is no damage in illegal immigration let’s have those discussions to shed light on it. Show up what a tit Farage is.
Unfortunately any talks thus far with our current leaders don’t seem to address or change anything.

Many threads on MN have come to a conclusion that a European health insurance system is inevitable at some point, that the NHS is beyond repair in its current form. Again, have real conversations about how the NHS can be sorted would be good right about now. As it is the “plans” (in the loosest sense of the word) I’ve heard/read so far have no substance and no real way of showing how improvements are actually going to be achievable. But it needs thrashing out, not dismissing because someone’s saying something unpopular.

Farage is absolutely a bandwagon grifter, but he appears to have listened to people’s concerns and appears to be willing to take them seriously, which is more than can be said for Sunak and Starmer. Tories have had 14 years to make a dent on the mess we’re in. Starmer has had 4 years of being leader of the opposition. We don’t have a lot to show for it. Maybe if things weren’t such a shambles there wouldn’t be such a public appetite for Reform.

To be clear I am not voting Reform, I’m not right wing in any way. However I feel like I’ve learned from the Brexit shitshow that it’s not enough to put up with lazy polarisation. That way chaos and destruction lies.

Farage's so called plans to sort the NHS include cutting tax and giving all NHS workers a tax free income. And giving a tax break to people who use private healthcare.

Clearly Farage is not a stupid man. He doesn't actually believe that you can run a health service on very little money. He just thinks voters are stupid.

The European insurance based systems all cost a lot more per head than the NHS. They spend a third more than us, at least. Why does Farage think it would be cheaper here? If anything it would cost more due to the poverty and health inequality that is so much worse here than elsewhere (more people on benefits, addicted, obese etc)

The immigration issue is so bad partly because the Tories didn't staff the departments properly leading to 2 year delays in cases being heard. This is the cause of the need for housing them in hotels, barracks etc. Apart from that the UK takes far fewer asylum seekers than other European countries. Most asylum seekers stay near their country of origin. Then some stay in other European countries. Only a small minority make it as far as the uk. This problem is constantly misrepresented by the press. The existence of asylum seekers is largely due to western foreign policy.

cakeorwine · 15/06/2024 10:04

fliptopbin · 15/06/2024 09:55

Have sll of the people going on about proportional representation forgotten that we had s referendum on this,and hardly anybody voted.

I suspect this might change now.

I also think it would affect the votes and seats that parties like the Lib Dems and Greens get as well.

ll09sm · 15/06/2024 10:34

PrincessTeaSet · 14/06/2024 23:00

So you think the NHS can be brought back up to standard at the same time as making tax cuts? How would that work?

Putting record funding into it has made the NHS worse. So there is clearly no evidence that giving yet more will make it better.

Aladdinzane · 15/06/2024 11:01

TBF many of the NHS's problems are caused by funding cuts to social care.

No longer can we get people out of hospitals and treated at home, they've got to stay till any care they need has been totally completed.

This blocks beds, means staff can't be reallocated, and slows the entire process down, making things rather more expensive.

OP posts:
beguilingeyes · 15/06/2024 11:01

NHS funding has been cut, in real terms, since the Tories came to power. Fourteen years ago it's approval rating was sky high.
This is what they do.

Notonthestairs · 15/06/2024 11:19

We have fewer CT and MRi scanners per head than many of our European neighbours - that leads to diagnostic delays. Fewer beds. Fewer doctors & nurses. We spend less on administration.

www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/blogs/comparing-nhs-to-health-care-systems-other-countries

•	Average day-to-day health spending in the UK between 2010 and 2019 was £3,005 per person – 18% below the EU14 average of £3,655.
•	If UK spending per person had matched the EU14 average, then the UK would have spent an average of £227bn a year on health between 2010 and 2019 – £40bn higher than actual average annual spending during this period (£187bn).
•	Matching spending per head to France or Germany would have led to an additional £40bn and £73bn (21% to 39% increase respectively) of total health spending each year in the UK.
•	Over the past decade, the UK had a lower level of capital investment in health care compared with the EU14 countries for which data are available. Between 2010 and 2019, average health capital investment in the UK was £5.8bn a year. If the UK had matched other EU14 countries’ average investment in health capital (as a share of GDP), the UK would have invested £33bn more between 2010 and 2019 (around 55% higher than actual investment during that period).

www.health.org.uk/news-and-comment/charts-and-infographics/how-does-uk-health-spending-compare-across-europe-over-the-past-decade

NotDavidTennant · 15/06/2024 11:34

Churchview · 14/06/2024 22:00

I understand how our voting system works.

I'm not talking about our power - we vote the party in in good faith for 5 years, I know that.

However, in other parties, during that 5 years there is peer control.
Reform UK won't have that. Nobody within the company can remove him.

He can behave a appallingly as he sees fit and the company and country have no redress for five years.

No, that's not how it works. He can't be removed as Reform party leader but he could be removed as PM if the majority of MPs opposed him.

beguilingeyes · 15/06/2024 11:37

ExpressCheckout · 15/06/2024 09:55

Brilliant interview on PM on Radio 4 yesterday (Friday). The interviewer asked a polling expert whether the media frenzy around Farage actually increased support for him. Pricking her London Media Bubble, the expert reminded the interviewer that people who support Reform/Farage were very unlikely to listen to Radio 4 😂

It's not just R4 though is it? I never listen to Radio 4 and I'm sick of the sight of him. How many times has he been on Question Time? He's like Bojo. He makes good copy so the media are all over him.

ExpressCheckout · 15/06/2024 11:39

beguilingeyes · 15/06/2024 11:37

It's not just R4 though is it? I never listen to Radio 4 and I'm sick of the sight of him. How many times has he been on Question Time? He's like Bojo. He makes good copy so the media are all over him.

^Yes, this, I agree

Sue152 · 15/06/2024 11:47

Surely what we learn from Farage is that if you are a white privately educated male that can bullshit like your life depends on it, then you'll probably do really well in life.

Notonthestairs · 15/06/2024 11:49

"He can't be removed as Reform party leader but he could be removed as PM if the majority of MPs opposed him."

What is the contractual relationship between Reform and its candidates? Presumably there is one. How would they replace a leader?

Aladdinzane · 15/06/2024 11:52

beguilingeyes · 15/06/2024 11:37

It's not just R4 though is it? I never listen to Radio 4 and I'm sick of the sight of him. How many times has he been on Question Time? He's like Bojo. He makes good copy so the media are all over him.

Somebody I know at the BBC was that the word on the street there about his appearances on QT was that whenever they offered a UKIP appearance to the party, Farage took it. Other parties vary their representation, Farage went every, single, time, that they offered a UKIP candidate/representative on

OP posts:
CheshireCat1 · 15/06/2024 11:52

Farage is only the leader of his own personal dictatorship, the company Reform.

ExpressCheckout · 15/06/2024 11:54

Sue152 · 15/06/2024 11:47

Surely what we learn from Farage is that if you are a white privately educated male that can bullshit like your life depends on it, then you'll probably do really well in life.

Why 'white'? Are you saying that it's only white people who bullshit?

Aladdinzane · 15/06/2024 11:56

ExpressCheckout · 15/06/2024 11:54

Why 'white'? Are you saying that it's only white people who bullshit?

I think what they are saying is that there seems to be a certain demographic that gets away with far more of it in public life?

OP posts:
ExpressCheckout · 15/06/2024 12:00

Aladdinzane · 15/06/2024 11:56

I think what they are saying is that there seems to be a certain demographic that gets away with far more of it in public life?

Yes, I understand that, but I do think it's a lazy shorthand, that's all, and there is good and bad in all politicians irrespective of skin colour.