Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

175k salary and all gone

1000 replies

175allgone · 26/05/2024 02:02

This will ruffle some feathers, but after tax, mortgage , childcare, living expenses….there doesn’t seem much left. SE London, commuting, wrap around care. Whilst I appreciate I’m not having to watch my bills I’m hardly living an extravagant lifestyle.

OP posts:
wombat15 · 26/05/2024 19:18

MintsPi · 26/05/2024 19:10

You got me.

I feel bad for telling a lie but thought it would seem so outlandish that the government would just hand out over 60k to us that it would show up the "low earners get topped up so much" brigade.

We actually get child benefit for 1 child and that is it. We don't get free school meals, free prescriptions or free unicorns.

We have a mortgage. Our place is small. We don't have a garden. We have had to cut our cloth.

We still have to pay...deep breath everyone...council tax, electric, water, gas , commuting costs, food, school uniform, dentist costs etc etc. It isn't all magically cheaper for low earners.

The government deems 30k a year enough to live on for a couple with one child. If 30k is enough then 95k is enough.

The fact that some posters believed it says it all.

AmberHiker · 26/05/2024 19:20

My income is just over 6,000 a month with no childcare costs and I struggle so paying that much for childcare is insane I think a nanny might be cheaper OP

Hoolahup · 26/05/2024 19:21

£60k in benefits?? I thought there was a cap?

CutthroatDruTheViolent · 26/05/2024 19:23

Otherstories2002 · 26/05/2024 16:31

You aren’t getting a big fancy house for that mortgage payment. Not even close.

Where are you getting your information from? How do you know how much deposit OP put down on her property?

Oh you don't.

MinnieMountain · 26/05/2024 19:24

DH and I have a similar household income to you.

We have holidays, good pension contributions and savings because we choose not to live in London/the SE. Our mortgage on a solid, pretty 3 bed terrace is £1,000 a month and nursery fees would be £2,000 a month for 2 DC.

Do you both have to live in London for your jobs?

coupdetonnerre · 26/05/2024 19:24

Rah88 · 26/05/2024 08:43

^ this. I keep hearing people saying “I’m just not sure I trust Labour/Starmer!” It beggars belief - like it’s a massive risk to vote them in - when the Conservatives have proved time and again over 14 years that they are not trustworthy.

I wonder if OP can move abroad for better opportunities and less expenses. On 175K you should be keeping at the very least 80% of your income and ideally nobody should be paying for school or childcare - we pay enough taxes.

OhMaria2 · 26/05/2024 19:27

175allgone · 26/05/2024 03:07

Sorry, didn’t mean to offend. People are telling me to move to a cheaper area of london. How does that work for everyone else not on such a salary?

In debt to the energy company and eating crappy food to save money. Have you tried cheaper shops?
And do you really have nothing left over, or does it just feel like that right now because you've had to sacrifice some things that you consider normal, like the odd meal out, new clothes etc? Are you still going on holiday this year?

People are losing their homes and using food banks to survive, its terrible. If you think you're poor on your income god help us all. When is it going to get better?

WithACatLikeTread · 26/05/2024 19:29

DodoTired · 26/05/2024 17:48

yes, because- newsflash - all public services are paid from tax revenue, and majority of tax revenue comes from small number of high earners, so please learn to be grateful to those who pay for police, prisons, civil service, NHS, schools, roads etc

Most people even the poor pay council tax. They will be funding roads and other things local to them. Perhaps more than your taxes.

CuttingMeOpenthenHealingMeFine · 26/05/2024 19:31

bluetopazlove · 26/05/2024 18:07

I haven't followed this thread for all it's time but why is sort degrading shit trotted out almost always by parents . You know this makes you an awful person right? to trot out the most degrading shit a human being could say about a another human being . Who is most likely at the end of their life and there is you ready with your insults .It's probably the least human thing you could say to someone at the end of their life .

Yeah but I’m already an awful person anyway for overpopulating the planet/stealing everyone else’s hard earned tax (because parents don’t pay tax obvs) etc etc etc (plenty of other examples of how bad parents are see every second bloody thread on Mumsnet) so one more thing doesn’t make much difference does it?

MintsPi · 26/05/2024 19:32

wombat15 · 26/05/2024 19:18

The fact that some posters believed it says it all.

Exactly.

I'm not digging at anyone who did believe it as many posters have no experience of claiming benefits so don't really know how likely the scenario would be. However I do see it posted a lot on here that if someone quit their high paid job to work in a supermarket they would be just as well off which isn't true.

Katbum · 26/05/2024 19:33

It’s temporary though, while your kids are little. Once they are in school you won’t have a massive childcare bill. Unless obviously you send them private, but that’s a choice. Our choice is that one of us does the childcare and the other works. We make additional income from side hustles. We’re doing ok in se London on about 75k less than you.

Inyournewdress · 26/05/2024 19:34

SouthLondonMum22 · 26/05/2024 19:05

It's short sighted though. It might save money on childcare but it would also be a financial hit on OP's earning potential, pensions etc so may not actually save anything at all.

It will be financially beneficial in the long term because the expensive nursery years are short.

Yes that is a good point for sure. Depending on personal preference taking a bit of a hit on that front is worth it to be with your dc, on the other hand I know some people feel they need to go back for all kinds of reasons.

tigesa · 26/05/2024 19:36

shuggles · 26/05/2024 18:03

If you say so, dear. People who are rich all worked for it, and the rest of us are just lazy (even though there was a high earner who claimed to be "shattered" after working only 50 hours a week).

Given the volume of outrageous replies there have been to this thread. I will be reporting this to clown planet.

@shuggles i didn’t call anybody lazy. I just acknowledged that anyone who obtains wealth through a job, does so by working, not by ‘sucking’ it out of the economy, as you rudely suggested.

tigesa · 26/05/2024 19:37

Differentstarts · 26/05/2024 18:49

Absolutely but they've also chose to live in one of the most expensive places in the country.

@Differentstarts again, though, the point of the thread is that 175k doesn’t actually enable these things when it should.

so I’m not sure why more people aren’t supportive of the OP.

MissLucyLiu · 26/05/2024 19:38

rwalker · 26/05/2024 05:31

people are blinded when the see 175k

but to busy sticking the knife in to realise
you'll pay
71k deductions
9k pension
leaving you 95k take home in your hand
48k child care
30k mortgage
leaving 17k a year to live on which is comparable to someone on benefits

would it be cheaper to employ a full time nanny instead of nursery

Edited

the only realistic answer i've seen so far.
this is why people chose to have no kids or 1 kids.. having 2 kids in Islington is luxury so you have to reduce other luxuries. ORR focus on other streams of income.. discuss with you and partner what other options to make money grow.

Nesbi · 26/05/2024 19:39

I think one thing we can all agree on is that nothing gets Mumsnet quite so excited as a “high earner but I’m feeling the pinch” post!

Absolute gold dust that has clearly kept a lot of people thoroughly entertained and engaged on a bank holiday weekend.

Beezknees · 26/05/2024 19:42

tigesa · 26/05/2024 19:37

@Differentstarts again, though, the point of the thread is that 175k doesn’t actually enable these things when it should.

so I’m not sure why more people aren’t supportive of the OP.

But there ARE certain pockets of London where you do have to be extremely wealthy to live. OP could live practically anywhere else in the country and be better off, even in a different area of London her money would go further. She's chosen the one area that is the most expensive. It's a choice.

175allgone · 26/05/2024 19:51

@Bumblebee907 didnt seem much point in continuing responding when the general solution was I should move to a 2 bed terrace in Skegness, put the children up for adoption and hope I can continue my STEM career up there.

OP posts:
Feelingstrange2 · 26/05/2024 19:53

Haha having your children adopted was a joke!

DishSoap · 26/05/2024 19:53

Move out of London then.

godlikeAI · 26/05/2024 19:54

hettie · 26/05/2024 09:49

I think this is key to understanding why higher earners feel they are hard done by or doing it wrong.
In the previous generation of you did all the right things (only accessible to drive mins you), either worked long hours in finance or law or went into medicine you were guaranteed salaries and lifestyles to match. It was very very normal for Dr's, lawyers and people in insurance/finance by mid career to have a semi detached house, kids in private school and a summer holiday plus skiing.
Inflation, particularly housing cost inflation (and childcare)has outstripped wage rises by some stretch. So if you weren't paying attention to macroeconomics it's perhaps come as a bit of a suprise that your well paying career doesn't give you the same buying power.
But... It really shouldn't be that surprising, I mean some of this is basic forward planning and maths? Also everyone else has also been hit by the disparity in stagnant wage growth and rampant housing and childcare costs and for those people who have less choice and are having to make really hard choices they've been truly fucked over. Noise diving productivity and a completely unregulated housing and childcare market has absolutely buggered a generation...
So op, unlike the generation before you bluntly you can't afford the lifestyle you want/thought you could have. Either tough it out till childcare is done or move or move and move jobs or get into earning more....

Exactly right, agree with all of that - and I fully appreciate that I’m still left with a cushion larger than most and that the violins are tiny, as a PP said. However, it is still not fun to have a large pay cut, in real terms, even when salary is high.

Epli · 26/05/2024 19:56

175allgone · 26/05/2024 19:51

@Bumblebee907 didnt seem much point in continuing responding when the general solution was I should move to a 2 bed terrace in Skegness, put the children up for adoption and hope I can continue my STEM career up there.

But what kind of solution we can offer? We have a HH income of ~150k (depends on bonuses) and don't even think about moving to London because we would be in similar situation. Of all senior people in my company, who earn at least 80k annually, only 1 lives in London for exactly this reason. You either grit your teeth until children and in school or move out of London.

3WildOnes · 26/05/2024 19:56

Beezknees · 26/05/2024 19:42

But there ARE certain pockets of London where you do have to be extremely wealthy to live. OP could live practically anywhere else in the country and be better off, even in a different area of London her money would go further. She's chosen the one area that is the most expensive. It's a choice.

I live in zone 6. OP would have a similar size mortgage on a 3 bed terrace unless she has a ton of equity and she would still have a 4k pm childcare bill. It's the childcare which is the killer and the reason I spaced out my children. In a few years the OP will be significantly better off unless she sends her children to private schools.

LiveLove24 · 26/05/2024 19:57

@MintsPi do you really get £60k in benefits?

someone suggesting you are joking…

Differentstarts · 26/05/2024 20:00

tigesa · 26/05/2024 19:37

@Differentstarts again, though, the point of the thread is that 175k doesn’t actually enable these things when it should.

so I’m not sure why more people aren’t supportive of the OP.

Their not millionaires they can't have everything they still have to be mindful but they do have more choices then most.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread