Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

175k salary and all gone

1000 replies

175allgone · 26/05/2024 02:02

This will ruffle some feathers, but after tax, mortgage , childcare, living expenses….there doesn’t seem much left. SE London, commuting, wrap around care. Whilst I appreciate I’m not having to watch my bills I’m hardly living an extravagant lifestyle.

OP posts:
SwingingPonytail · 26/05/2024 18:06

shuggles · 26/05/2024 18:03

If you say so, dear. People who are rich all worked for it, and the rest of us are just lazy (even though there was a high earner who claimed to be "shattered" after working only 50 hours a week).

Given the volume of outrageous replies there have been to this thread. I will be reporting this to clown planet.

Can you stop with the silly patronising 'dear'.

You are making some very odd statements.

Are you simply jealous? If you have so many qualifications, what's stopped you being a high earner? Do tell.

Would you like to earn more but can't (for whatever reason...)?

People who are rich worked for it...

well, yes, most have unless they are the landed gentry or inherited enough not to work much.

bluetopazlove · 26/05/2024 18:07

shuggles · 26/05/2024 17:43

I seriously doubt anyone else's children are going to wipe my arse. Have you asked yours, and what did they say?

I haven't followed this thread for all it's time but why is sort degrading shit trotted out almost always by parents . You know this makes you an awful person right? to trot out the most degrading shit a human being could say about a another human being . Who is most likely at the end of their life and there is you ready with your insults .It's probably the least human thing you could say to someone at the end of their life .

rzb · 26/05/2024 18:09

shuggles · 26/05/2024 17:43

I seriously doubt anyone else's children are going to wipe my arse. Have you asked yours, and what did they say?

If you're definitely not going to need nursing care, that's great. If you find you do, or if you perhaps need a medic in a specialism that your children don't have amongst them, you are likely to find yourself relying upon and benefitting from the children of other people. Are you and/or your children also going to grow all the food you're going to be eating? Will you and they ensure you have energy security? Is your family actually fully self-reliant? Or, do you think you might actually need to rely on some form of economic activity that extends wider than you and your own offspring?

Matthew54 · 26/05/2024 18:10

I think it’s a sign a thread is done when the antinatalists make an appearance.

wombat15 · 26/05/2024 18:11

DodoTired · 26/05/2024 13:36

Which tax credits are you talking about? UC?
Good for their children. I bet they claim free childcare hours though. But someone is footing their bill for subsidised childcare/NHS/schools/police etc. if they earn less than 40K (or is it 50k now)

Just because one parent works part time, it doesn't mean the family aren't net contributors.🙄

shuggles · 26/05/2024 18:12

SwingingPonytail · 26/05/2024 18:06

Can you stop with the silly patronising 'dear'.

You are making some very odd statements.

Are you simply jealous? If you have so many qualifications, what's stopped you being a high earner? Do tell.

Would you like to earn more but can't (for whatever reason...)?

People who are rich worked for it...

well, yes, most have unless they are the landed gentry or inherited enough not to work much.

The majority of people who have reams of academic qualifications don't earn much money. Being a high earner generally means being part of a certain club, or group of people, who will let you have those highly-paid positions. Or cronyism, to put it plainly.

Nextdoor55 · 26/05/2024 18:12

175allgone · 26/05/2024 02:10

Take home after tax and pension ~8500. Mortgage 2.5k, childcare £4K, bills and commuting ~£1k

£4k childcare?! Get a live in nanny or something that's way too much!

justasking111 · 26/05/2024 18:13

@175allgone your childcare costs are shocking. You'll just have to suck it up for now. Think how rich you'll feel when they're both at school.

I just stopped working until the youngest started school because nursery costs were ridiculous.

shuggles · 26/05/2024 18:14

bluetopazlove · 26/05/2024 18:07

I haven't followed this thread for all it's time but why is sort degrading shit trotted out almost always by parents . You know this makes you an awful person right? to trot out the most degrading shit a human being could say about a another human being . Who is most likely at the end of their life and there is you ready with your insults .It's probably the least human thing you could say to someone at the end of their life .

I wasn't the person who brought up the subject of arse-wiping.

roses2 · 26/05/2024 18:14

Tooski · 26/05/2024 02:35

I’d feel broke too with 4K on childcare. Holycrap.

10 years ago I was paying £3k for 2 kids in full time nursery so £4k today sounds about right.

What's not right is the OP said they're in Sout London then later said they're in Islington which is North London. So something there isn't true about the original post.

Nextdoor55 · 26/05/2024 18:14

I don't think yabu because lack of resources are everywhere, there are lots of people who are 'working poor,' I know this is not your situation but I get it.
I'd still review the childcare though that would hurt giving that away every month!

EasternStandard · 26/05/2024 18:15

shuggles · 26/05/2024 18:03

If you say so, dear. People who are rich all worked for it, and the rest of us are just lazy (even though there was a high earner who claimed to be "shattered" after working only 50 hours a week).

Given the volume of outrageous replies there have been to this thread. I will be reporting this to clown planet.

I’m not sure you’re making much sense tbh

EmilyTheCriminal · 26/05/2024 18:16

rzb · 26/05/2024 17:39

Do you have your own children who are fully intending and signed up to wipe your bottom when you're too frail to do so yourself, or are you intending to rely on other people's children to do this for you?

Is that the job you would like your children to do?

This is such a tired, lazy argument.

shuggles · 26/05/2024 18:17

EasternStandard · 26/05/2024 18:15

I’m not sure you’re making much sense tbh

If you say so, but pretending to be confused isn't going to change anything. Your boyfriend Rishi Sunak will be out of office in 6 week's time.

TheAlchemistElixa · 26/05/2024 18:18

upthehills1 · 26/05/2024 17:06

Where did I say they are 'worth' more than anyone else? It's pretty simple economics and we do not live in a communist society where everyone earns the same take home pay. Or is that what you think we should do?

Those on higher salaries have more money, it's simple. If they end up paying so much in tax that they do not have more money, they will simply not work to achieve that high salary as they would not see any benefit from it. Equally, if those on lower salaries are 'topped up' by benefits and tax relief so that they basically net the equivalent take home cash, those on high salaries feel it is pointless trying to succeed further in their career and earning potential. Then what do we do?

There is so much wrong with the way you think that I’ll have to limit myself to tackling just two important points.

The first is that those on the lowest incomes who most need state welfare of various kinds do not have the luxury of striving for a “career” and additional “earning potential”. They live hand to mouth, in whatever job they can scrabble to find. Sometime multiple jobs. Some of them can’t work at all due to illness, disability, or mental incapacity of some kind. The idea of striving for a career is an entirely middle class conceit, one that instantly marks out someone categorically wealthier and luckier than the strata of society that props up the daily lives (supermarkets, hospitals, roads, parks, councils, waste, water) of the rest of society. If they suddenly had the luxury of choice that you do, all of that would collapse and you’d be dragging your own green bins to the dump and wiping your own arse in hospital. I doubt you’d like that, so throw them some respect and empathy and understanding. Invisible hands (and sometimes very visible hand that those of the people I strongly suspect you consistently vote for) have shaped their lives and opportunities. And society closes off the rest.

Secondly, I can’t understand why the higher earners don’t understand that the higher tax thresholds don’t take ALL their extra money, just a percentage of it. So there’s absolutely nothing stopping them from being incentivised to earn more, or work more, because THEY STILL TAKE HOME MORE MONEY. Only the most churlish and intrinsically sad and angry decide not to further their own - already blessed by so many invisible advantages - careers, just to somehow spite any of those more deserving from benefiting from a few more of their measly pennies.

Those who earn more, EARN MORE. They can and should contribute more, too.

bluetopazlove · 26/05/2024 18:19

shuggles · 26/05/2024 18:14

I wasn't the person who brought up the subject of arse-wiping.

Oh I don't know who it was , I said I wasn't watching that closely But It's just something i had noticed on MN .

wombat15 · 26/05/2024 18:20

SwingingPonytail · 26/05/2024 17:57

What is a bit of an eye opener here considering there's an election coming is how some posters don't even understand the tax system and basic economics.

It's become clear that some posters prefer to insult people who are high earners rather than asking themselves why they are NOT a high earner (because they are clearly envious of those who are.)

Education? Ambition? Don't like hard work?

It's a bit of an eye opener that high earners think moaning about not feeling rich enough and generally insulting the intelligence and work ethics of those who work hard for a lot less money is a good way of persuading people that high earners should pay lower taxes.

EasternStandard · 26/05/2024 18:21

shuggles · 26/05/2024 18:17

If you say so, but pretending to be confused isn't going to change anything. Your boyfriend Rishi Sunak will be out of office in 6 week's time.

Oh dear

Good luck with life

But no those posts earlier didn’t make sense

shuggles · 26/05/2024 18:22

EasternStandard · 26/05/2024 18:21

Oh dear

Good luck with life

But no those posts earlier didn’t make sense

The posts made perfect sense and it's not for you to say to anyone "good luck with life." You are just being rude.

EasternStandard · 26/05/2024 18:24

shuggles · 26/05/2024 18:22

The posts made perfect sense and it's not for you to say to anyone "good luck with life." You are just being rude.

And your posts are pleasant at this point?

You’re lashing out at whoever, it’s not really helping

Grinchinlaws · 26/05/2024 18:27

shuggles · 26/05/2024 18:12

The majority of people who have reams of academic qualifications don't earn much money. Being a high earner generally means being part of a certain club, or group of people, who will let you have those highly-paid positions. Or cronyism, to put it plainly.

Not in my case.

And for the avoidance of doubt, Im
proud to pay the tax that I do and wouldn’t change it.

But I do resent the suggestion that (i) my taxes are only for my benefit (wtf) and (ii) that I shouldn’t use or be entitled to better value childcare because my kids are my own responsibility.

LiveLove24 · 26/05/2024 18:27

You’re right OP, you’ll notice a lot of schools are closing because many young families just can’t afford to live in London and raise a family.

a friend’s daughter who’s 26, on £80k has just quit her job and us moving to Norfolk with her BF.

Shes got nothing left at the end of the month after rent, bills, travel and food cost.

People find it unbelievable that that sort of salary wouldn’t be enough and yet it isn’t.

It’s not because she’s not being careful it’s because the the rent got so high now it swallows most of the earnings, even for a small place.

She was tired if having nothing left at the end of the month and not saving enough to buy a house. Impossible in London too.

TheAlchemistElixa · 26/05/2024 18:30

SwingingPonytail · 26/05/2024 17:57

What is a bit of an eye opener here considering there's an election coming is how some posters don't even understand the tax system and basic economics.

It's become clear that some posters prefer to insult people who are high earners rather than asking themselves why they are NOT a high earner (because they are clearly envious of those who are.)

Education? Ambition? Don't like hard work?

I LOVE these threads because they out people like you, who I find hilarious, like a Fast Show character.

Then I despise them, because they out people like who, and make me realise that you are actually out there somewhere, thinking the way you think and all the ripple effects that has on the rest of us, and voting the way you will inevitably vote, which has catastrophic effects for the rest of us.

Do you honestly truly think that anyone not a high earner just hasn’t tried hard enough to be one? What on earth would you do if all the teachers and road maintenance teams and hospital porters all suddenly “worked hard” and became bankers and lawyers instead?

Sobering stuff. I guess money can’t buy emotional intellect, financial nous, or pure basic empathy and decency. Ho hum.

MintsPi · 26/05/2024 18:33

upthehills1 · 26/05/2024 17:06

Where did I say they are 'worth' more than anyone else? It's pretty simple economics and we do not live in a communist society where everyone earns the same take home pay. Or is that what you think we should do?

Those on higher salaries have more money, it's simple. If they end up paying so much in tax that they do not have more money, they will simply not work to achieve that high salary as they would not see any benefit from it. Equally, if those on lower salaries are 'topped up' by benefits and tax relief so that they basically net the equivalent take home cash, those on high salaries feel it is pointless trying to succeed further in their career and earning potential. Then what do we do?

You are completely correct that low earners are topped up so highly that they have incomes equivalent to that of a high earner.

The sums put up by a previous poster that an income of £175k a year reduces down to 95k after taxes stunned me. My dp works full time Mon-Fri and I work 2 full time days on the weekend. We earn 33k between us before tax. We don't use childcare as we work opposing days. We receive 60k a year in benefits so are just as well off as the OP despite working no where near as hard as she does. I suggest she leaves her job and joins the low earners club!

SwingingPonytail · 26/05/2024 18:35

TheAlchemistElixa · 26/05/2024 18:30

I LOVE these threads because they out people like you, who I find hilarious, like a Fast Show character.

Then I despise them, because they out people like who, and make me realise that you are actually out there somewhere, thinking the way you think and all the ripple effects that has on the rest of us, and voting the way you will inevitably vote, which has catastrophic effects for the rest of us.

Do you honestly truly think that anyone not a high earner just hasn’t tried hard enough to be one? What on earth would you do if all the teachers and road maintenance teams and hospital porters all suddenly “worked hard” and became bankers and lawyers instead?

Sobering stuff. I guess money can’t buy emotional intellect, financial nous, or pure basic empathy and decency. Ho hum.

Edited

So nice to meet you. I'm so pleased my posts amused you - in fact were hilarious.

I don't have the time or the inclination to reply and my post was for someone else anyway, answering her posts and trying to get to the root of her bile that she's spitting out.

Yours covers other things. And you're putting words into my mouth.

Enjoy the rest of your evening.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.