To think Keir Starner is ignoring women and children’s rights?

[Greengablesfables]

Hello hello? Kier? We’re here. We are right here. We are Women. Are you listening to us? Hello? Hello?

@GoodAfternoonGoodEveningAndGoodnight

Did I say I would vote for the Tories?

That's the problem. As women, we aren't exactly overwhelmed by great options are we. Most of the political parties want to remove the category of 'woman' all together, thus removing a century and a half of hard-fought-for rights, and the remainder just ignore us and hope we will be quiet.

For whatever reason you make it personal and insulting

Pot meet kettle. Who said this?

Don’t read it then 🤷‍♀️ you’re here every time

You're also more obsessed with ‘toilets’

Have you ever started a thread on the topic you want to discuss? or more about having a go on these ones

Gosh, posts like this are fun to read 🙄

Well you are here on these threads despite saying how much you’re not interested each time 🤷‍♀️

It’s not a comment on your life or whatever as in the pp.

Inaccurate on their part anyway.

Aren’t they just? They’re no fun to write either. If only they weren’t necessary.

Perhaps some of the businesses Ms Murthy invests benefit from government decisions; many businesses do.

Mrs Sunaks husband is also indirectly benefitting. Just a teeny conflict of interest. I wonder what the current ethics advisor thinks?

The term necessary clearly being given an unusual definition here.
its ok, you can spare me the explanation

Is there one now? Johnson dispensed with the role when he was PM.

Why is it a conflict of interest? Are you saying that no member of the government can ever be in a position to benefit from government decision making? A startling proposition, if so

Starmer’s wife works for the NHS. Does she have to resign to permit him to make decisions benefitting that organisation?

She’s an occupational therapist so hardly in a position to profit by squillions of £ if he was PM.

Ok, I understand. It's perfectly OK for Sunak to make decisions on how to run the country based on how he and his family can personally indirectly profit, but It's not ok for Starmer to run the country based on what may or may not be right for his family.

No double standards there at all.

Well I'm sure you'll be told you don't have to read them 😁

😂

https://www.gov.uk/government/people/laurie-magnus

Im not the one saying there’s a problem here - you are.

Nah you’ll always click on and read these threads 😀

Well said.

But a benefit might be meaningful to one person which isn’t material to another. The issue is conflict of interest. If the principle is that members of the government can’t ever be in a position to benefit from government decisions (and I’m not arguing that - I think it’s mad) it’s got to be applied consistently.

Let women speak!
(No not you 😁)
#womeneontwheesht
Except you. Sit down 😂

Yup. Ever the bloody same. Maybe if people just accepted that the UK is not in a good state and stop trying to gas light us ?

What is it you’d like to say?

Apart from this is tedious, stop posting this shit

Anything

I think what this discussion shows is that there is literally nothing the Sunak/Murthys could do to convince a certain type of person that his involvement in politics does not have a financial motive. I mean, his government is taking away non dom tax status and even that’s not enough.
its pretty sad, actually

The one they said they wouldn’t but only did because labour were going to and they wanted to stop that

Yes exactly, completely agree it's a state.
I'm bothered about the NHS, I trust Labour with it more than I do the Tories.
I'm bothered about community centres disappearing, which can be so much help when you've just had a baby and want some social interaction /health help etc.
These to me are important as a woman.