You don’t know what they are going to do. They could be burglars but equally they could be rapists or murderers. You don’t know that in the heat of the moment.
Quite. As well as having proven themselves to have obvious nefarious intentions, by breaking in and carrying weapons as they did so, they had the great luxury of knowing in advance what their plan was and also of knowing what they would or wouldn't do with their weapons.
The poor, terrified farmer had none of this.
I bet, if the burglar had tried to shoot the farmer and the bullet had rebounded back off a brick in the wall and killed him instead, there would still be people out there blaming the farmer for his death.
I'm not a lawyer, but I don't see how they can possibly be considering a verdict of murder with any seriousness. Surely murder requires an element of planning and malicious intent aforethought? Especially when you hear of people acting with violent abandon which leads to the death of their victim being only found guilty of manslaughter, because it's judged that they 'only' intended to seriously harm their victim but not actually kill them.
Are they claiming that the farmer planned for these creatures to break in to his property - armed - specifically so that he could deliberately kill them, with a motive that would obviously not have existed in the first place had they not decided to break in? Absurd.
I don't take any pleasure from the death of a young person in this way, but I also hesitate when their loved ones sorrow over how tragic it was and specifically how much their 'loveable rogue/rough diamond/no angel but...' still had to live for. I find it extremely difficult to believe that one so young who had already chosen this selfish, destructive and deadly pathway in life would have had a very productive long life as a highly-respected pillar of the community ahead of him. 'Still had so much to live for' does rather sound more like 'so many more innocent people to terrorise and maybe kill' before eventually coming to an end himself.