I'm very aware of the statistics which is why I was very confident in my response.
Like I said, what you said is not true. Because it isn't.
Here's your post:
"bellezarara · Yesterday 21:44
No, don’t report them. Women are already disproportionately targeted for legal action for license fee evasion, don’t add to the sexism"
You said women are disproportionately targeted. No they are not.
Women are disproportionately effected because of societal reasons. Low income, single mothers etc. Which the government and BBC are well aware of are discussing how to address that.
But women are not disproportionately targeted, because there's no way for that the TV licencing system can target anyone, regardless of sex.
They identify people who aren't paying and issue fines.
And you can't go to prison for not having a TV licence but you can for not paying the fines and in that case men disproportionately go to prison for not paying the fines because more women are issued with them and don't go to prison because there are more government schemes to help women, particularly mothers and courts are more disinclined to imprison Women, particularly women with children.
So yes, you were wrong again, in saying women were targeted and that it is sexism as sexism is disadvantage based on sex.
Women aren't targeted for TV licencing prosecutions and it isn't sexism.
There are just more women prosecuted because more women are prosecuted/co-operate with prosecution for the offence and if they don't pay the fines, they are actually likely to benefit from being women as men are more likely to be imprisoned.
HTH.