Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Are you a socialist? What about your child? Or are you anti-abortion? Maybe anti-Monarchist? A communist? Do you know someone who is like that? Then the Government thinks you are showing signs of extremism and should be referred to Prevent

165 replies

cakeorwine · 08/03/2024 18:41

And if you are a teacher, then you have a professional duty to report them

Socialism, anti-fascism and anti-abortion on Prevent list of terrorism warning signs | Prevent strategy | The Guardian

A document from Prevent, the official scheme to stop radicalisation, includes believing in socialism, communism, anti-fascism and anti-abortion in a list of potential signs of ideologies leading to terrorism.

It comes as the Conservative government considers widening what it will consider to be extremism.

The document is part of online Prevent awareness training for those covered by the duty to inform if they suspect radicalisation. That includes teachers and youth workers.

In a section on the left wing it states: “Two broad ideologies: socialism and communism. Each are united by a set of grievance narratives which underline their cause.”
In a section on single-issue ideologies, the document reads: “Narratives are likely to come from those who seek to change a specific policy or practice, as opposed to replacing the whole economic, political or social system. Examples include animal rights, anti-abortion or anti-fascism. Single-issue narratives can be politically agnostic, meaning they may be neither right nor left aligned.”

Neil Basu, a former police head of counter-terrorism, said: “That is far too nebulous, and there is no qualification. It might lead to unforeseen consequences such as overwhelming the system and bringing the system into disrepute.

The document:

You need to do the training to see the document

Awareness course | Prevent duty training (support-people-susceptible-to-radicalisation.service.gov.uk)

Socialism, anti-fascism and anti-abortion on Prevent list of terrorism warning signs

Communism also among ideologies on document as human rights groups say UK scheme has been politicised

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/mar/07/socialism-anti-fascism-anti-abortion-prevent-list-terrorism-warning-signs

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
JessS1990 · 08/03/2024 20:31

Cazpar · 08/03/2024 20:26

No, the government calls them potentially extremist. Anything can be extremist if taken to, well, extremities. Doesn't matter if it's extreme left wing or right wing politics. Prevent is there to tackle extremism regardless of political stripe.

When does hating the poor and dispossed become extreme?

Fallenangelofthenorth · 08/03/2024 20:31

pointythings · 08/03/2024 18:45

Well, we know this government doesn't like protest. It's odd that they've decided to make all of us some kind of radical though. I mean, I'm anti-monarchy, a socialist and anti-fascism. Not big on communism and I'm the exact opposite of anti-abortion (why isn't that considered radical?).

Joking aside, this trend is concerning. We should all be anti fascist because that's where this government is heading.

It's not just THIS government, it's ALL governments worldwide. You can't vote your way out of this. There's been similar laws introduced ìn many countries over the last couple of years.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 08/03/2024 20:33

Well, I'm now halfway through the final training and

  1. I've not seen a single non-white face in the videos as an 'authority' in the process.
  2. Apparently, medication can control Autism. So not taking that anti-Autism medication is a concern.
  3. A white boy assaulting non-white boys isn't much to be concerned about, rather than a middle aged homeless Somalian woman ranting on the street corner.
  4. Not long to go before I can download another certificate to add to the lever arch file of certificates.
cakeorwine · 08/03/2024 20:34

Cazpar · 08/03/2024 20:31

Yes, and terrorism can arise from extreme political views, left or right, extreme religious views, incel views, etc etc.

Which is why the potential signs of radicalisation that need to be watched out for are very very wide ranging.

It doesn't mean if you are a socialist or if you resent women for not dating you that you're a criminal and need to be locked up.

And that's why Laurence Fox, Suella Braverman ,Liz Truss should be reported.

Or maybe, just maybe, too many people will fall under this radar - and the potential terrorists will get missed as resources get stretched and people who are a concern get through.

OP posts:
DelilahsHaven · 08/03/2024 20:34

It sounds preposterous, and as though just being a vocal socialist would not be enough for the government or law to be interested on you.

However, during the eighties, my family's mail was being opened for a period of time, plus there were odd sounds on the phone during the same period. It has since been revealed that there WAS a government list, and I'm sure my family was on it.

My dad was a labour/co-op party member, and we had family membership on CND, and I think Greenpeace. We attended meetings and protests, but were never arrested and never did anything criminal.

So, with sadness, I can believe that you could indeed be considered a dangerous radical for holding socialist beliefs and everything else on the list. The current political landscape feels very similar in many ways.

I shall hand myself in forthwith.

Cazpar · 08/03/2024 20:37

cakeorwine · 08/03/2024 20:34

And that's why Laurence Fox, Suella Braverman ,Liz Truss should be reported.

Or maybe, just maybe, too many people will fall under this radar - and the potential terrorists will get missed as resources get stretched and people who are a concern get through.

Report them then. If you think you have enough evidence that they are dangerous extremists, report them.

I'm absolutely no fan of any of them, but you are being deliberately obtuse and refusing to think about how prevent actually works.

Dotty2dot · 08/03/2024 20:37

I just skip the videos on the online Prevent training. I'll look out for the socialist one next time and hand myself in.

cakeorwine · 08/03/2024 20:38

I am sure the women fighting to get votes for women would have been referred to the Prevent programme.
As would the workers who fought to get Union recognition, votes for workers - and definitely the people at the Peterloo massacre.

If you get referred to the Prevent programme, how does that affect your life?

OP posts:
Auvergne63 · 08/03/2024 20:39

emmetgirl · 08/03/2024 20:20

Oh dear.
I'm socialist and strongly anti monarchy.
I'll go and hand myself in then.

Well I am definitively a socialist (proud of it too!) and a republican, on account of being French, which makes me an immigrant as I live in the UK.
I am doomed!

coastalhawk · 08/03/2024 20:41

Didn't know about this. Shocking...

fabio12 · 08/03/2024 20:43

Cazpar · 08/03/2024 20:37

Report them then. If you think you have enough evidence that they are dangerous extremists, report them.

I'm absolutely no fan of any of them, but you are being deliberately obtuse and refusing to think about how prevent actually works.

As far as I am aware no anti-fascist stabbed an MP and her aide
All reports were about far right leaning ideologies being more likely to use violence and have weapon idolatry
Violent mobs are more likely to be far right than far left in recent years

I'd love to know where they are getting ideas that the protests to help Gaza are somehow violent mobs. It's a far cry from anything I've seen on the news.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 08/03/2024 20:43

Dotty2dot · 08/03/2024 20:37

I just skip the videos on the online Prevent training. I'll look out for the socialist one next time and hand myself in.

Thankfully, they provided a transcript of each video, so they could be scanned through in a couple of seconds.

Cazpar · 08/03/2024 20:47

fabio12 · 08/03/2024 20:43

As far as I am aware no anti-fascist stabbed an MP and her aide
All reports were about far right leaning ideologies being more likely to use violence and have weapon idolatry
Violent mobs are more likely to be far right than far left in recent years

I'd love to know where they are getting ideas that the protests to help Gaza are somehow violent mobs. It's a far cry from anything I've seen on the news.

Extremism can come from any angle.

It's too simplistic and negligent to assume that your problems will always come from a fascist angle even though I agree that it is, in recent years, one of the main drivers.

You can't just assume that X political leaning is safe and Y political leaning is dangerous. Everything can present a risk when taken to the extremities.

cakeorwine · 08/03/2024 20:49

However - numbers referred are actually low

Individuals referred to Prevent: to March 2023 - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

In the year ending 31 March 2023, there were 6,817 referrals to Prevent. This is an increase of 6.4% compared to the previous year (6,406), and the third highest number of referrals since the first period reported on (2015/16). The increase is predominately driven by an increase in referrals from the Education, Community and Police sectors which saw increases of 16%, 16% and 7% respectively.

For the third year running, the number of referrals for Extreme Right-Wing concerns (1,310; 19%) is greater than referrals for Islamist concerns (781; 11%).

Of the 645 referrals that went on to be adopted as a Channel case, 296 (46%) were for Extreme Right-Wing concerns, 115 (18%) were for Islamist concerns, and 103 (16%) were for those with a Conflicted ideology.

Maybe the numbers will go up now?

Are you a socialist? What about your child? Or are you anti-abortion? Maybe anti-Monarchist? A communist? Do you know someone who is like that? Then the Government thinks you are showing signs of extremism and should be referred to Prevent
OP posts:
Dotty2dot · 08/03/2024 20:50

i'm an extreme socialist. What will happen to me? Will I have to go for far right training?

cakeorwine · 08/03/2024 20:50

Cazpar · 08/03/2024 20:47

Extremism can come from any angle.

It's too simplistic and negligent to assume that your problems will always come from a fascist angle even though I agree that it is, in recent years, one of the main drivers.

You can't just assume that X political leaning is safe and Y political leaning is dangerous. Everything can present a risk when taken to the extremities.

Absolutely true.
Better to be safe than sorry
I hope to see those numbers rising - with the new guidance in place.

OP posts:
DdraigGoch · 08/03/2024 20:52

pointythings · 08/03/2024 19:43

Violent methods? You mean the rioting that happened in the US, in which heavy handed police tactics were a factor?

Please also define 'left wing nut job' because by your lights I probably am one and I'd like to know so I can get a badge and wear it with pride.

Also I reiterate: Fascism gave us two world wars. Antifa isn't even in that ballpark. We've barely heard from them recently.

The main threat right now is from the extreme right.

Isn't Putin claiming to be anti-facist? That's the justification he's using for invading Ukraine. Clearly if you say that your opponent is a Nazi you can do whatever you like.

On a point of history, I'd be interested to know what part you think Fascism played in causing the First World War. Fascists were active in Italy in 1914 but Italy wasn't a big player in the war, and I can't see that Fascism had any role in the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, the Central Powers invading Serbia (Austria hadn't consulted Italy before doing so), the Allies retaliating etc.

pointythings · 08/03/2024 21:27

@DdraigGoch if you look at this definition of fascism here:

often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of oppositionT

The first part of that definition very aptly describes the propaganda material that was used in the runup to WW1. You have but to look it up. The movement didn't have a name at that point, but the roots of the fascism that was one of the drivers of WW2 were already very much present.

If you want to be nitpicky about it, you can call it 'proto-fascism' if that makes you happier.

JessS1990 · 08/03/2024 21:39

I reckon Keir ought to be careful, they might soon add knowing the legal definition of a woman to being an extremist.

Neveralonewithaclone · 08/03/2024 21:48

🚴Sorry for being an incel

AdamRyan · 08/03/2024 21:53

Hoardasurass · 08/03/2024 20:25

If you want to bold ww1 down to its very basic route cause it would be kizzer bill being jealous of his cousin King Edward but that would be an oversimplification of the situation which involved the machinations of Austro-Hungarian ruling classes again imperialism not fascism. As for the rise of fascism in Germany between the wars it was as a direct result of the rise in communism and the failure of capitalism, which itself is a direct result of the treaty of versilles (know in Germany at the time as the dictat) and the reparations that it imposed.

As for my political leaning I'm a left leaning Liberal who is disgusted by the abject failure of the left to hold the far left at bay, instead they have embraced it. We have antifa turning up in anti women hate marches holding signs saying "punch a terf" etc.

I see history repeating itself and threads like this are just stoking the fires as you would see for yourself if you just took off those left =good right= bad blinkers.

You appear to be minimising fascism.
And "punch a terf" rhetoric is as much to do with the left wing as Tommy Robinson is to do with the right wing.

fabio12 · 08/03/2024 21:56

Cazpar · 08/03/2024 20:47

Extremism can come from any angle.

It's too simplistic and negligent to assume that your problems will always come from a fascist angle even though I agree that it is, in recent years, one of the main drivers.

You can't just assume that X political leaning is safe and Y political leaning is dangerous. Everything can present a risk when taken to the extremities.

It's also surely foolish not to see rhetoric inciting further "extremism" if you repeatedly don't listen to what a lot of the country are having to protest to be heard about - aid to Gaza. It's humanitarianism they are trying to call extremism in this case.

AdamRyan · 08/03/2024 21:57

Cazpar · 08/03/2024 20:20

That's basically how safeguarding works. You don't assume anyone is "ok" or beyond question.

I'm sure we'd all agree that safeguarding is important, yes?

Do you seriously think the police should be monitoring socialists/anti monarchists/antifascists etc?
They don't have the resources to monitor paedophiles or arrest rapists ffs

VenetiaHallisWellPosh · 08/03/2024 21:59

History repeats. America in the 1950s/60s, the era of McCarthyism.

I'm not a radical I don't think, apart from being an extreme atheist. Never mind God, I don't think ANYTHING paranormal exists. That aside I'm fairly moderate.

AdamRyan · 08/03/2024 22:02

Just curious, are there any examples of socialist terrorism in the UK?

Swipe left for the next trending thread