Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be so flabbergasted by my husbands response to me asking him to get a vasectomy.

1000 replies

Mumsgotaheadache01 · 25/02/2024 01:07

I've recently lost our 4th baby. Ive had 3 previous miscarriages. With 1 live birth, Of our very young child who has additional needs and was born with a birth defect. Was an IVF pregnancy. I have pcos, fibroids, fluid in pelvis the list goes on. And have only recently stopped breastfeeding our child. I really don't want to go on hormones for birth control as I don't want to mess up my hormones and my body anymore. I suffer enough and have had all number of procedures, tests, examinations, surgical procedures, scans and hormones pumped into my body. I just want to be left alone. I've been injured while giving birth very traumatically, many stitches, hemorrhaged etc. We don't have sex often for many reasons. Mainly being I'm exhausted from being mummy and in pain a lot. When we do it's lovely and I do love my husband very much. But this evening I asked him if he would think about getting a vasectomy. So we can enjoy our sex life again in the knowledge I won't get pregnant and have a miscarriage or another baby. Before I could even put to him my point of view he flat out refused. And said "I wouldn't put myself through that". I am just completely shocked by how selfish that is. It's upset me so much. Aibu to be flabbergasted or should I just calm down and try a see this from his point of view.

OP posts:
QueenBitch666 · 26/02/2024 01:22

His body his choice. Why can't you get yourself sterilised if he's adamantly against vasectomy?
Before anyone pipes up... female sterilisation is a simple procedure. Short anaesthetic and recovery time. I had mine at age 30. Best thing I ever did.
Simple 🤷‍♀️

LorlieS · 26/02/2024 01:24

@Globules I'd be incredibly surprised if those three babies were all successful post-vaesectomy and after the sample analysis was given the "all clear."

Ponderingwindow · 26/02/2024 01:36

Iwasafool · 25/02/2024 21:51

The risk isn't zero, that's the point. I've said earlier my husband had it done and no problems at all, my colleague had it done and was in agonising pain for months, had surgery to try and correct the problem. I don't know if it was ever resolved. I'd hate to be the wife who'd guilt tripped him into having the op and then had to live with the consequences just as much as I'd hate to be the husband who guilt tripped his wife into having a baby/sterilisation/boob job or anything else that then resulted in her living in pain for the rest of her life.

Just because it wasn't an issue for my husband or many husbands referred to on here doesn't mean it is always OK.

But the risk from birth control isn’t zero. The risk from pregnancy isn’t zero. That is the point.

women take those risks over and over for years. Loving husbands volunteer to take an extremely low risk one time.

Catsmere · 26/02/2024 02:01

Garlickit · 25/02/2024 23:34

I wonder how your colleague and all the whining men on here would feel if not having the snip caused another living being to grow in their abdomens that reconfigured their internal organs, made them swell up and gave them fatigue, diabetes, piles and incontinence, and could only be removed by painfully expelling it through their genitals - which had to be stitched up afterwards - or via a surgeon's cut through all the walls and muscles of their pelvis?

If the choice were that or a weekend with sore balls, I wonder what they'd choose?

(Pardon my evil cackle here)

If only men were the ones to give birth. As has been said many times, there would only ever be one-child families then ...

LameBorzoi · 26/02/2024 02:24

Ponderingwindow · 26/02/2024 01:36

But the risk from birth control isn’t zero. The risk from pregnancy isn’t zero. That is the point.

women take those risks over and over for years. Loving husbands volunteer to take an extremely low risk one time.

The risk from birth control can be net protective, given that it protects against ovarian and endometrial cancer.

Reversible and permanent contraception are very different things.

Permanent contraception would be very ill advised in OP's husband's setting - too soon after a baby and miscarriage.

LameBorzoi · 26/02/2024 02:32

SlumberDearMaid · 25/02/2024 19:57

It’s absolutely mind-boggling that actual women are MORE horrified by a man having a simple, minutes-long procedure under local anaesthetic - than by a woman spending her entire life dealing with -

menstruation
contraception
the ongoing risk of pregnancy
risks from being pregnant (usually multiple times)
complications from pregnancy
childbirth (often multiple times)
breastfeeding
more years of monthly menstruation
peri-menopause
menopause

And then not even getting into issues like endometriosis, collapsed prolapse, piles and the multitude other physical and emotion issues we deal with, as part of being the child-bearing sex.

I just cannot get my head around it.

But why should I hold my husband accountable for the fact that I menstruate? Yeah, biology is shit, but that's not his fault.

I didn't want my husband to have a permanent procedure. So I had a mirena, which guess what, controls menstruation! Win win!

NoOrdinaryMorning · 26/02/2024 03:07

What a selfish man. I really hope you pointed out everything you put your body through! What did you say?

SlumberDearMaid · 26/02/2024 03:14

LameBorzoi · 26/02/2024 02:32

But why should I hold my husband accountable for the fact that I menstruate? Yeah, biology is shit, but that's not his fault.

I didn't want my husband to have a permanent procedure. So I had a mirena, which guess what, controls menstruation! Win win!

I don’t really care what you do with your husband.

I’m just thankful that mine wanted to do his bit - for a change! It saves me worrying about / dealing with contraception ever again.

I was more than fine with my husband having a permanent procedure - why wouldn’t I be? We don’t want any more kids.

And if something happens to me, God knows he doesn’t want to go back to babies with a new partner!

It’s lovely having a considerate partner who recognises biology is shit, and can do one small thing to rectify that. Smile

Unwantedadvice · 26/02/2024 03:25

brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr · 26/02/2024 00:05

What he said doesn’t belittle what she went through. It doesn’t mention it. It’s just a form of “no”.

I lost all hope for humanity until I read this. The only normal response.

Butterdishy · 26/02/2024 06:06

Globules · 25/02/2024 23:21

These are very different figures to earlier in the thread.

I can't find the relevant post now as I need to sleep, but a quick Google shows condoms being 98% effective, vasectomy 99% effective.

Real life experience made the 1% difference irrelevant to us. 3 babies born post vasectomy easily swung things into the condoms favour for us.

Edited

3 post vasectomy babies is so staggeringly unusual. Someone isn't telling the truth.

Globules · 26/02/2024 06:19

Butterdishy · 26/02/2024 06:06

3 post vasectomy babies is so staggeringly unusual. Someone isn't telling the truth.

So I'm now being told I'm not telling the truth. I understand it's easier to believe that. 😉

@LorlieS One of those families were in the process of suing the hospital, as they had been given the all clear. I don't know about the other two families, as they didn't give me further details besides their immaculate conceptions and I didn't ask.

PietariKontio · 26/02/2024 06:37

Condom's 12% failure rate is due to including people not using them correctly, e.g. wrong size, putting them on too 'late' etc. When used correctly their failure rate is monumentally small, less than 1%

What confuses me in this debate is the 'condom or no sex' position - there are a lot of other options than penetrative sex to continue an active and loving sex life without having any risk of pregnancy, which surely negates either partner having to have any kind of surgery or other treatment.

Having said that, and while noone should be expected to do anything to their body they don't wish, it seems fair in most cases that the bloke takes his turn. In me and my wife's case that was what we were planning, although due to 'events' in my childhood (not going to do more detail, sorry) I have a phobia about that part of my body - but was going down a private-GA route. However, a developing health condition of my wife's meant it wasn't needed in the end, can't say I wasn't relieved due to my phobia, but it was something I would have done otherwise because how could I have said I loved my wife if I didn't?

Butterdishy · 26/02/2024 06:42

Globules · 26/02/2024 06:19

So I'm now being told I'm not telling the truth. I understand it's easier to believe that. 😉

@LorlieS One of those families were in the process of suing the hospital, as they had been given the all clear. I don't know about the other two families, as they didn't give me further details besides their immaculate conceptions and I didn't ask.

I didn't say you were lying...

Globules · 26/02/2024 07:10

Butterdishy · 26/02/2024 06:42

I didn't say you were lying...

Correction:

So now I'm being told either the families or I were not telling the truth.

I understand it's easier to believe that.

Rosscameasdoody · 26/02/2024 07:46

Globules · 25/02/2024 23:21

These are very different figures to earlier in the thread.

I can't find the relevant post now as I need to sleep, but a quick Google shows condoms being 98% effective, vasectomy 99% effective.

Real life experience made the 1% difference irrelevant to us. 3 babies born post vasectomy easily swung things into the condoms favour for us.

Edited

So you didn’t look at the actual statistical evidence, you used people you know. Unless you factored in evidence from people you know who use condoms it’s not really a logical assumption to make. The figures for the failure rates I quoted were from a recent US study. I’ll see if I can link to it. The failure rate of condoms was 3% if used properly but stated that real world figures showed a rise to 12% when misuse, defective manufacture and accidental removal/breakage during sex were factored in. They pointed out that vasectomy was considered the gold standard because of the advances in surgical technique and post surgical checks on sperm counts.

JellyCatPenguin · 26/02/2024 07:49

artpkvea · 25/02/2024 20:01

I just cannot get my head around it.

I strongly suspect they have husbands who have refused, or they know would refuse if discussed, and they are in denial as to what that means about him, their relationship and how their husband values them, so they are deflecting.

And many have very low standards and accept their role as servile women. Even in 2024 in the UK. There is a lot of it on MN. It’s depressing as they will pass their sexist views on down to their sons and daughters. All whilst thinking they are clever, spouting ‘his body, his choice’ without engaging their brain as to the real issue here.

JellyCatPenguin · 26/02/2024 07:50

ladygindiva · 25/02/2024 20:24

Spot the male posters. Cannot believe some of these posts. I hope they're male anyway; otherwise the level of internalised misogyny is truly terrifying. Op yanbu. Your DH is being a selfish prick. But then, that's what men do best imo.

I wish they were men. But there are many women misogynists on MN. They can’t even see it.

Suchagroovyguy · 26/02/2024 07:57

Globules · 25/02/2024 23:21

These are very different figures to earlier in the thread.

I can't find the relevant post now as I need to sleep, but a quick Google shows condoms being 98% effective, vasectomy 99% effective.

Real life experience made the 1% difference irrelevant to us. 3 babies born post vasectomy easily swung things into the condoms favour for us.

Edited

Sorry are you saying you had three children after a vasectomy? It that you know of the born after?

Either way, do you see that your post isn’t particularly logical? 😂

KimberleyClark · 26/02/2024 08:33

LorlieS · 26/02/2024 01:24

@Globules I'd be incredibly surprised if those three babies were all successful post-vaesectomy and after the sample analysis was given the "all clear."

In extremely rare cases it is possible for the tubes to spontaneously reattach. It’s very rare but not completely unheard of.

Butterdishy · 26/02/2024 08:48

KimberleyClark · 26/02/2024 08:33

In extremely rare cases it is possible for the tubes to spontaneously reattach. It’s very rare but not completely unheard of.

Considering the prevalence of vasectomies, and the low failure rate, it is far more likely that people have told porkies.

Iwasafool · 26/02/2024 08:49

SlumberDearMaid · 25/02/2024 23:20

Of course the risk isn’t zero - nobody’s claiming it is.

But women deal with risk from the minute we start to menstruate.

Risk is a daily part of our reproductive lives.

Yet the minute SOME (sub-standard) men face any sort of risk, no matter how low, they baulk.

Sorry - zero sympathy.

How unpleasant. Do you support a woman saying no children/no more children? Do you support a woman saying no sterilisation or no hormonal contraception? If you do why wouldn't you support a man having the same rights?

Iwasafool · 26/02/2024 08:55

Garlickit · 25/02/2024 23:34

I wonder how your colleague and all the whining men on here would feel if not having the snip caused another living being to grow in their abdomens that reconfigured their internal organs, made them swell up and gave them fatigue, diabetes, piles and incontinence, and could only be removed by painfully expelling it through their genitals - which had to be stitched up afterwards - or via a surgeon's cut through all the walls and muscles of their pelvis?

If the choice were that or a weekend with sore balls, I wonder what they'd choose?

(Pardon my evil cackle here)

I had four children, I wanted them and accepted any risks involved. As it happens I don't have piles, varicose veins, incontinence. One of mine was delivered by CS so didn't arrive by being expelled via my genitals. I never had pain relief in labour in fact after my first was delivered it was such a great experience I thought the stories about labour were all made up. Some women have a different experience but it is their right to make the choice of having a baby or not having a baby. Any man trying to force a woman to go through that against her will is despicable.

I don't know why you are referring to a weekend with sore balls when I clearly stated my colleague was in extreme pain for months and had to have further surgery to try to correct that. It certainly wasn't a miracle cure but I moved on to another job so I have no idea if it eventually cured the problem but my understanding is there was no guarantee.

Your evil cackle says a lot about you.

Butterdishy · 26/02/2024 08:56

Iwasafool · 26/02/2024 08:49

How unpleasant. Do you support a woman saying no children/no more children? Do you support a woman saying no sterilisation or no hormonal contraception? If you do why wouldn't you support a man having the same rights?

Men saying no to reproductive responsibility is already the default. Not sure why they'd need any more support on that front.

Iwasafool · 26/02/2024 09:00

Ponderingwindow · 26/02/2024 01:36

But the risk from birth control isn’t zero. The risk from pregnancy isn’t zero. That is the point.

women take those risks over and over for years. Loving husbands volunteer to take an extremely low risk one time.

We all have a right to make our own decisions about risk and our body. I risked all pregnancy risks because I wanted a baby and on balance the risk was worth it. We used various forms of birth control until my husband decided the risk of vasectomy .was worth it for the benefits but that was his decision to make.

Would you tell a woman who didn't want to go through childbirth that it is something loving wives do or would you say she has a right to decide?

Iwasafool · 26/02/2024 09:03

Butterdishy · 26/02/2024 08:56

Men saying no to reproductive responsibility is already the default. Not sure why they'd need any more support on that front.

They have that support as we all have a right to make decisions about our own bodies. I don't like how my husband is dealing with long term serious health conditions that I, and his doctors, think are shortening his life but I have no right to force him to have surgery, take medication he refuses because of side effects or do anything else I consider would be good for his health. On the other hand he has no right to demand I'm his carer, I make my choices as he makes his.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread