To be angry that Scarlet Blake is being called a woman.

[ArabellaScott]

Scarlet Blake has been found guilty of murder. He also tortured and killed a cat.

He is not a woman.

This shouldn't be reported as a woman's crime.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-68360122

Just read the article in the Times, all she / her and only mention to being transgender is that they were previously known as Alice. Trying to work out how to cancel my subscription, looks like I need to call them up tomorrow, absolutely fuming

Same, so bloody disappointed in them.

This is absolutely disgraceful. It should be made very clear in news reports that Scarlet Blake is transgender. This is another case of trans 'rights' superseding women's rights. This person wants to identify as female and we must all oblige, despite the fact that they're a sadistic murderer. Statistics show that women rarely commit violent crimes. It's frightening to see that the BBC is untrustworthy. I bet this person is placed in a women's prison, it's utterly shameful.

I don’t want men’s crimes attributed to women. With what other “minority” group would it be ok to blame the minority knowing full well that they were not responsible.

Sex not gender.

“Blake who was born male but now identifies as female” or similar near the top of the article would cover it.

…and the crime should be recorded as male crime because it is.
Or if that is too problematic “crimes committed by men that identify as female” would also cover it.

The Times has changed the headline so it’s no longer ‘woman’ but ‘cat killer’. Honestly

The graun, inevitably, respecting murderers preferences. Refers to a previous female name but not the name that this person would be known to authorities as

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/feb/23/cat-killing-woman-guilty-murdering-man-oxford-scarlet-blake-jorge-martin-carreno

Meanwhile they have no problem with slut shaming and dead naming when it's the right hate figure

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/14/rachel-dolezal-nkechi-diallo-onlyfans-arizona-school-fired

Well said, totally agree with this.

Cat killer gender. Rapist gender. Oh the coyness and the cowardice.

The courts, police, cps, prison and probation services will not have him recorded as a woman. While they tend to use people's preferred pronouns just for politeness the assessment of risk presented by any individual and the location at which they are held is very much linked to biological sex.

Fucking furious that the media are choosing to fawn over this convicted murderer with his preferred pronouns rather than get behind the women who are saying, "He's not ours, we don't want him."

This actually really upsets me. I’d read previous stories and having not seen any photos believed it was a woman. I thought it was very unusual but didn’t question. Now I realise I have been duped. I’m fucking livid frankly. Where will this end?

Bbc News South Today just now gave absolutely no hint that Scarlet was anything other than a woman.
I am so bloody angry.

I am annoyed that the BBC complaints demands your email address, name, home address, and phone number in order to place a complaint against a service WE FEKKEN WELL PAY FOR.

But I have registered a complaint.

I'm 61. It comes as a shock to me, over the past few years, the extent to which the BBC has lost its way.

But please put in a complaint.

I've complained to the BBC. I am bloody angry about this. The lying cowards.

I have no issue with Scarlett being referred to as a transgender woman or the female pronouns being used for her. I think the press (and judge) are right to report in this way. It is a basic respect shown to all transgender people.

It's complete and utter disrespect for all women. This person lost the right to the polite fiction of 'woman' or 'she' when he torturously killed that poor cat and murdered a human. What 'respect' is this man due?

I heard about this as a woman committing the crime and thought how strange. Now I know why.

That BBC article should have had a content warning. I wish I hadn't seen those gruesome details and felt sickened. They're rather more careless with my sensitivities than they are with selected others.

It's a badly written article and not just because the unnamed author does not know how to spell disdain. The lie of reporting a male criminal to be a woman is blatant and cruel. And it's amplified in a bold heading and link underneath the article:.

"From other local news sites

Woman, 26, GUILTY of murdering Jorge Carreno "
...
Then we are informed "...and came out to her parents as transgender at 12."
Stick the word 'transgender' on a child or assert that a child can 'come out as', as if it is something that the child is. It's slipperiness with language. What does the writer think the 'trans' in 'transgender' signifies? It not just a free-floating arrangement of letters. How does the BBC justify using the term? There has to be something behind attributing that to a child. But what? I think we should be told because otherwise we might believe it is taking an ideological position and feeding us a line.

The murderer must go into a male prison. Any intact m2f transgender must not be in a prison with women. The Home Secretary needs to instruct all prison governors of this.

I feel the same but have also logged a complaint.

Thus isn't a new issue - there is a whole process whereby the location of transgender prisoners is very carefully considered.

This case has been reported on the Oxford Mail website for months now and it's only in the last week or so that I can remember them mentioning that Scarlet is a transwoman. In fact, I remember just a few days ago reading that fact and being surprised it wasn't mentioned earlier. Until just a week or so ago, I was under the impression that Scarlet was a woman - this was all down to the reporting on the local news site.
The crime is horrific as is what this person did to the poor cat.
I wonder how long Scarlet will identify as a woman for when they're placed in a man's prison? I really hope the judge doesn't pander to Scarlet and place them in a woman's prison, but, I've got a horrible feeling this might happen.

Well it wasn’t very carefully considered, was it? When Karen White and Islas Bryson eat al we’re in women’s prisons.

Careful consideration is not needed. Male prisoners including transwomen go to male . Individual need within that category to be considered as usual. Vulnerable prisoners wing etc.

I’ve complained, so sick of this.

Let's not be disingenuous about this, the 'careful consideration' has largely been 'how do we hush this up and hide all the evidence so these horrible men can crack on using and abusing all our women prisoners as is right and proper?'

In England they're at least being a bit more careful but Scotland seem to be heading fast back towards enthusiastic human sacrifice as soon as special men are involved.