Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Would you have a baby at 50?

1000 replies

pumpkinpatch6 · 16/01/2024 01:01

Off the back of the "Do you regret having a baby at 40" thread, would you have a child at 50 assuming you can provide for it emotionally and financially? Obviously medical assistance would be needed.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
alltootired · 16/01/2024 13:30

@Codlingmoths so your husband did take your DC on play dates. You were insisting this did not have to be part of parenting before.
If course the mum does not have to do it, your child has two parents. But someone has to do it.

Changed18 · 16/01/2024 13:32

theDudesmummy · 16/01/2024 13:03

@Neurodiversitydoctor your figures are very far from correct

Babies born to women aged 45 and over rises by a third - BBC News

This mentions how many babies were born to mums 45 and over in 2009 (1578), my DS was one of them! The numbers have increased since then.

Really interesting if you read the story.

ONS statistician Nick Stripe said London had lowest under-18 birth rate but the highest birth rate for women aged 45 and over.
"In contrast, the north-east of England has the highest under-18 birth rate but the lowest birth rate for women aged 45 and over," he said.
"Social, economic and cultural differences between these areas are likely to be causing these differences."

I expect comments on here are coloured by that geographical/attitude difference as well. I would think higher costs of housing/childcare in London would be a factor.

emilysquest · 16/01/2024 13:32

Just popped back and nice to see the sanity level rising!

Codlingmoths · 16/01/2024 13:34

alltootired · 16/01/2024 13:30

@Codlingmoths so your husband did take your DC on play dates. You were insisting this did not have to be part of parenting before.
If course the mum does not have to do it, your child has two parents. But someone has to do it.

@alltootired huh? I’m pretty sure that is my second comment on this thread and my first comment was two letters - NO. I think you have me confused with someone else.

TheaBrandt · 16/01/2024 13:34

However you opt to parent I wouldn’t want to be doing any of it at 50!

CeeCeeBloom · 16/01/2024 13:41

Christ, no! I'm 45, I have 17 month old DGD one day a week whilst DSD is at work. I'm bloody knackered afterwards and I usually have help as DH or one of my dds is home.

Jk987 · 16/01/2024 13:50

Its biologically almost impossible so why is it a question as if people have a choice?

Ok you can use someone's egg or embryo but it's not exactly straightforward.

ohfook · 16/01/2024 13:54

I would if I was very wealthy and had the money to pay someone to do all of the other boring and tiring things so I could just sit around and enjoy baby cuddles while somebody else cleaned my house, did the night feeds etc.

As it happens, I'm not very wealthy so I wouldn't.

Neurodiversitydoctor · 16/01/2024 14:02

Gunnersforthecup · 16/01/2024 12:48

That seems a bit low to me. I had children aged 43 and 47, naturally. I was surprised to find that another mum living in our road had her (slightly older) children in her mid to late 40s also, the second one also as a rather welcome surprise (after age 47).

Therefore, I'd be amazed if, for the whole of the UK, there were less that 10 babies born per year to women aged 47+, that had been conceived naturally.

Mind you, we did see a fertility specialist at one point, to see why we had had 3 miscarriages; the doctor told me that I would never have children; when we went back for the follow up appointment, I had fallen pregnant naturally. So I don't know whether that would count as "fertility treatment"?

I wouldn't say so.

GG1986 · 16/01/2024 14:04

No, unless I had fertility problems and finally became pregnant.

banjocat · 16/01/2024 14:08

CrossMiddleAgedWoman · 16/01/2024 08:37

I personally wouldn’t do it but I wouldn’t judge people who do. All of you judging people who do it and saying they are selfish, do you also think it’s selfish when 18 year olds have children as they are unlikely to have the finances to give the child a stable home? Do you think it’s selfish for obese people to have children as they may be too unfit to run around with them and may die young?

There is no ideal time or situation in which to have a baby and having them too old is no more selfish than having them too young.

Having children at 18 is obviously often not ideal, but it is totally different to having them at 50 once you have had years of life experience and understand everything that is entailed in raising a human, and what they are likely to need from you for the next 20-30 years. Yet still making that decision, having considered all of this, even having fertility treatment to bring a child into the world very deliberately, knowing that they will have an old parent.

I don't judge (I've had IVF myself and fully understand the pain) - but it is obviously much, much more selfish to have a planned IVF child at 50, than for an 18 year old finding herself pregnant with nowhere near the same life experience.

Redruby2020 · 16/01/2024 14:09

Bearing in mind how long it could take, then the pregnancy/birth/poss recovering from a C section. You are talking about going in to your early 50's. So half way through with a toddler erm no.
You do get some who are in really good shape and no health issues etc, so then you could think why not. Because then it would be more focusing on the woman's age, the child's age at different stages.
Rather than some of the usual things to be thought about.

I know of a lady from school who is 50 odd and a year or two ago was saying she would have another if she had the right man etc 🤦‍♀️ I was thinking are you crazy lol, when you struggle as it is 🤷🏻‍♀️

CJsGoldfish · 16/01/2024 14:10

No I wouldn't.
I don't think anyone having a child at that age is actually thinking of the child .Not a great start to the parenting journey 🤷‍♀️

flumposie · 16/01/2024 14:12

Absolutely not. I struggle with a 14 year old daughter at the age of 52 never mind in my 60s.

Bex5490 · 16/01/2024 14:24

I also think that by the time they’re 15 and your 65, you’d be so out of touch and naive to the lives of teenagers (including the dangers).

If my 64 year old mum was in charge of protecting my 15 year old niece from the dangers of social media for example- it would be a disaster…

chaosmaker · 16/01/2024 14:26

The extra care not provided by parents is just 'it takes a village' although I suppose they don't get different world views or anything from childminders etc. Can't see why it's such a bad thing, much better than the age thing.

HamBone · 16/01/2024 14:28

Flipping it around to older Dads, which has always been more socially acceptable, that can be rough on the children too and a cause of anxiety (will they get ill, etc.).

Rosinda · 16/01/2024 14:31

This is completely incorrect. Not single figures at all. Many more than 9 children were born to parents 50 and over last year. What an odd thing to say!! Where are you getting your data?

By parents, you include fathers? Nobody is surprised by older fathers as it's biologically the norm.

Older mothers 50+ without fertility intervention are going to be very rare. Don't doubt PP that that is single figures.

WildFlowerBees · 16/01/2024 14:35

No! Never mind the being a parent what about the child who will likely lose their parent at a younger age or have to care for them.

TiaSeeya · 16/01/2024 15:08

SingleMum11 · 16/01/2024 03:15

People are often horrified at women.
Slap on the back if you are a man.

This. Horrible double standards. Yes the pregnancy and birth etc but that’s not mostly what ppl are objecting to.

Bibisitsnow · 16/01/2024 15:09

No, but then I had 2 healthy kids in my 30s so really can’t judge how I would feel if I was Childless at 50 despite trying for them.
I think, still no.

Newchapterbeckons · 16/01/2024 15:10

emilysquest · 16/01/2024 12:21

@Newchapterbeckons you missed the part where the OP said "would you have a child at 50 assuming you can provide for it emotionally and financially". I could (well, not at quite 50) and I did. No-one, least of all me, is arguing I was not in a privileged position in having this ability to provide. The premise of this position was part of the question. I am absolutely privileged. I also know my limitations and if I had thought I was going to be caring for a child 24/7, I would not have had a child, it would have been a disaster (and I don't just mean financially).

My job involves intense dealings with many extremely socially disadvantaged people, including parents (and including older parents), don't speak to me about not understanding privilege and lack thereof. I do also take exception to your insinuation about my not caring about the impact of things on my children (would you say that to a father who was not suited to going to playgroups?) I know a great deal about child development. Being taken to Gymboree by a wonderful nanny, rather than me decreasing my income to do the same thing extremely badly was absolutely in my son's interests, believe me.

Got to go to work now!

You can adequately provide for a child financially without requiring an army of Nannies et al. You said you/others should go ahead with a baby after 50 without checking your privilege and own life experience. You haven’t even reached early adulthood or life stage with one child yet, so I am wondering how you would even know how it feels?

I hope you are damn well more self aware in RL than you are on here, because surely that it is a pre requisite for your role. I work in a similar field, and I find my work very humbling. Money though does not and never will equal good parenting. Some of the best parents I have ever met were those without huge amounts of resources and support.

alltootired · 16/01/2024 15:11

I certainly do not slap old men on the back having babies. They are too old. But at least it is the young woman who is often the mother who will be doing most of the actual childcare.

Rosinda · 16/01/2024 15:12

A 50 year old man having a baby with a young woman would raise eyebrows. But there's one younger parent.

So, it's not going to be the same as two 50 year olds TTC which feels much older.

Either way, it's a choice made. If anyone wants to do that, crack on and don't worry about what other people think of you. You're a mature adult who made that choice.

kingtamponthefurred · 16/01/2024 15:13

Newchapterbeckons · 16/01/2024 10:34

So if you didn’t do any actual parenting and it was all done by hired help - how on earth can you possibly say how difficult or otherwise this would be for women that can not afford an army of hired help??

And whilst I didn’t love every aspect playing and socialising with my dc, I did it anyway because I love them, you sound very selfish and removed from the reality of actual parenting much less doing so into older age!

I honestly don't understand why anyone wouldn't use 'hired help' if they can find it and can afford it.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread