OK, great.
Do you understand that an awful lot of what happens in the name of "trans rights" is extremely unkind to women?
For example, I don't know if you saw it linked upthread but this is an article about a woman who uses the pseudonym Sarah Summers, who has been fighting for several years now for women in Brighton to have access to single sex rape crisis support.
She was having counselling in a female only group when a male person joined. When she asked whether it was possible for there to be just one group which was guaranteed to be female only, she was told no, because trans women are women and are welcome in all women's spaces.
That's right, a rape crisis organisation decided that the potential harm caused to trans people by the very existence of a single sex group for female rape survivors was greater and more important than the potential harm caused to those female rape survivors by not having access to any single sex services. They have continuously doubled down on their position and she is now taking them to court.
The Survivors' Network is far from the only rape crisis organisation which has taken this approach; in fact in many parts of the country there is simply no single sex support for female survivors anymore. This was what led to JK Rowling setting up Beira's Place, a refuge in Edinburgh for female survivors. And guess what? Even though Beira's Place is completely privately funded by JK Rowling and does not take anything away from any of the other services that are currently available, all of which are inclusive of trans women, trans activists are attempting to have it shut down or forced to include males.
Do you have any thoughts about this?
Is it more important to be kind to biological males who want to appropriate everything to do with womanhood right down to pretending they have periods than it is to be kind to female survivors of rape and sexual assault?
Because it is this sort of thing that makes the words "be kind" get women's hackles up.
The kindness is only ever expected to be one way.