@LolaSmiles
From my point of view I would have considered this situation an emergency.
This is to say going out with my DS is like going out with an unexploded bomb that is ticking.
You know he is liable to blow up - in a positive or negative way - depending on environmental stimuli, and you try to keep everything on an even keel to avoid either major hyperactivity and excitement or extreme distress.
The change in OP’s son’s routine in terms of not being able to access his normal changing space + the sensory issues with being dripping wet + sensory/stress issues with queuing all equals to me 💥💥💥
So I would have been doing the same as OP looking for the quietest available space to get the kids washed quickly and out of there.
Again, I am not saying it is acceptable for all boys under the age of 18 to be in women’s changing rooms. Not at all.
What I’ve said consistently, is that this is still a young child - not an adolescent, 2 months beyond the cut off point for him to be in a women’s changing room. And it was a situation brought about by the leisure centre bunging baby changes in disabled space. And not taking into account the huge number of classes going on and the pressure this would place on changing facilities.
To be clear, OP had picked a suitable leisure centre with facilities and used them before, but not at the time when so many classes were on - she didn’t anticipate her son’s space being taken away.
Mothers and fathers with babies are not disabled. They can perfectly well change their babies in the single sex space - provided the baby changers are moved to there.
If these people had not been cluttering up disabled space in the first place then OP and her son would not have been displaced.
Leisure centre is at fault. Not the OP.