Here we go.
@UhohFibonacci said: "so if that is what they wanted to portray, then why would they kill 40 babies yesterday? Don’t you think that is contradictory to their “propaganda”"
On the contrary, terrorist organisations have dual audiences and their actions are designed to send a message to them in different ways.
Terrorist groups murder civilians including members of their own community to demonstrate their power and willingness to murder. Their supporters then perceive this as strength.
But these actions bring inevitable condemnation of inhumanity, so terrorist groups then try to counteract it by releasing propaganda aiming to portray them as "defenders".
It looks contradictory, but isn't in the minds of terrorist groups. See the attachments for an example of terrorist logic from Hamas' friends, the PIRA.
@UhohFibonacci said: "you are talking from a place of extreme privilege,
On the contrary, I'm speaking from a place of personal knowledge and experience of what it means to live under threat from a terrorist group.
In my case, it was Republican and Loyalist terrorists. But mainly the Provisional IRA, friends of Hamas.
@UhohFibonacci said: "you think that they should sit in a war zone without Defense and just wait for them and their families to be obliterated by Israeli forces who DO have weapons?"
No, and a Strawman Argument. But it is Hamas putting them at risk by operating amongst civilians and misusing civilian infrastructure including hospitals and even UN run schools over the years.
Hamas deliberately put Palestinian civilians in harm's way by using them as human shields.
@UhohFibonacci said: "who do they have civilian protection from?? Israel are bombing anyone and everyone, civilian or not, gun holding or not, including women and children"
Hamas are NOT defending Palestinian civilians by any means. See above.
**
@UhohFibonacci said: "they have a right to defend themselves, and not every Palestinian is Hamas or a supporter."
When Hamas were formed in 1987, they had minimal support from Palestinians. But in 2021, support for Hamas dramatically increased as AP News reported:
apnews.com/article/hamas-middle-east-science-32095d8e1323fc1cad819c34da08fd87
In 2022, respected Palestinian pollster Khalil Shikaki and his Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PCPSR) carried out a survey looking at Palestinian support for armed groups. Main takeaways below:
• 72% of Palestinians support forming more armed groups in West Bank
• in Gaza, 84% of respondents supported concept of armed groups taking NO orders from the Palestinian Authority. This is HIGHER than in the West Bank where 65% supported the idea.
www.pcpsr.org/en/node/924
So, the support for Hamas, Lion's Den and other Palestinian armed groups is there from the Palestinian population. A minority do not support them.
At the same time, Palestinian support for the Fatah party led by President Abbas in the West Bank has collapsed to as low as 14%. Abbas is struggling to keep control of the Palestinian Authority territory in the face of support for armed groups such as Hamas.
So, not all Palestinians support Hamas. But it is NOT wrong to say that Hamas have the majority Palestinian support. That may or may not change in future.
@UhohFibonacci said: "there’s no way for you to definitively prove that the men in the video are Hamas, since they are on a murdering rampage I doubt they would bother sparing this woman"
Ah, you're now using the Appeal To Ignorance Fallacy as you argue that your conclusion the men in the video are civilians (by omission in your original post!) projecting a woman and her child must be true, because there is no evidence against it.
Not a great argument, especially when the title of your video clearly states "Palestinian fighters". Therefore, it's NOT unreasonable to conclude those men ARE Hamas members since it was Hamas who invaded Israel on Saturday past!
I'm sorry to have to inform you that Hamas were not solely on a murdering rampage. They were ALSO looking for hostages and we know they've got at least 100 Israelis as hostages.
Your argument is weak. 🤷♂️