Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Russel has spoken

1000 replies

Whyismyfacealwaysdry · 22/09/2023 22:31

On Instagram, has anyone seen? What are your thoughts?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
24
Drivingone · 25/09/2023 11:03

What I find revealing is the cherry picking of information and data that conspiracy theorists do.

Data that they make 'fit' their theories is Truth.

Data from verified scientific sources is False and a Cover Up.

They quite literally ignore actual evidence ("actors" "staged") and disbelieve witnesses.

Not long ago, a conspiracy theorist met with reality when he was sued in America for spouting his dangerous bullshit.

Richie · 25/09/2023 11:20

Excellent explanation thank you. How sad, the facts are …..”low rate of prosecution of rapists, and the even lower rate of conviction”……and also…..”What's unfair is that rape apologists care only for the damage done to the perpetrator, and not for the life-changing damage done to the victims.” You write very clearly and well! 👍🏻😊👏🏻

Bingbangbongbash · 25/09/2023 11:31

Lazyusername · 25/09/2023 10:58

@fettuccini I think what a lot of people are saying is that we have not seen the full evidence yet and there is a legal process to be followed. I am hoping these women will now go to the police and the truth will be uncovered.

I am not saying I disbelieve these women but I cannot say I can take everything that is said on a TV show as gospel. That is not a good way for society to operate.

People who say they believe any woman, no matter what they say I'm sorry but I just don't. I could name any person I know now and say they raped me and some people say they would just believe it. But that person hasn't raped me. There needs to be evidence which is examined in a court of law.

With regard to the TV show; I have posted before to say that the sensationalist way this was all presented with the teaser videos, online hints, dramatic music etc. made me feel uncomfortable as to whether the motive was simply to expose wrongdoing. It was more like a Roman "bread and circuses" type production or the "Five Minute Hate" in Orwell's 1984.

I don't even think many of the public realised they were seeing actors on the documentary.

I also did not realise myself until reading further that "Alice" was working for Channel 4 at the time of the incident she describes on Big Brother's Big Mouth which was presented by Russell Brand. I feel we were led to believe this was a schoolgirl with no connection to him. Her mother also drove her to Brand's house during the relationship.

I also have now seen the unredacted text sent by the woman who says, "no means no" (it's online if you search for it). On reading it in full it is not quite as presented on the TV show.

This is why a TV spectacular on this was not the way to go and why people on this thread saying, "I never liked him, he is hairy, dirty-looking" etc. are ridiculous.

I've been a juror on a rape trial at which we found the defendant guilty. A major, major thing in such a trial is to hear the full evidence from both parties and to see them, hear them speak and watch their facial expressions and make a judgement as to what is the truth.

Let the courts decide. Otherwise it is nothing but a witch hunt.

If you didn’t realise you were seeing actors, you weren’t paying attention - it was clearly labelled.

If you don’t like music or trailers, why not read the Times article instead? It contains the exact same information about sexual assaults and rapes.

You seem to be confused about the timeline re ‘Alice’ - she met Brand when she was at school, when he approached her on the street. She went on to work in tv, and specifically channel 4, where Brand’s name came up as a suggestion for a presenter.

I can’t find the ‘unredacted’ texts except on some dreadful You Tube channel. Do you have a link?

As has been pointed out ad infinitum, the article and documentary must reach a standard of proof prior to broadcast - otherwise those involved are open to a defamation case. Both have been legalled to death - one reason not all the allegations were included. Without a wealth of corroborating evidence, they could not go to print.

Absolutely baffled how people can be so uninformed about the way the traditional media works. Of the endless checks & balances required to broadcast or print something.

NB this is not the case on social media where any old shit can be stuck in front of an audience of hapless twits with poor critical thinking tools.

DirectionToPerfection · 25/09/2023 11:33

summary of official data that "officials" would rather the masses didn't see'?

Which 'official data' are you referring to?

If it's something Russell Brand has access to, it's something the wider public would also have access to, so what's supposed to be hidden exactly?

sashh · 25/09/2023 11:39

This is why a TV spectacular on this was not the way to go and why people on this thread saying, "I never liked him, he is hairy, dirty-looking" etc. are ridiculous.

Why? I have never liked him.

I have never found him funny, I don't think he is particularly intelligent and I cannot get my head around people who think he is.

I'm not commenting on his YouTube content as I have never watched it.

vlo · 25/09/2023 12:10

@Lazyusername

Her mother also drove her to Brand's house during the relationship.

I have no idea why a minority of posters keep saying this. What bearing does it have on the rape allegation? (Or anything for that matter?)

Jumpingthruhoops · 25/09/2023 12:20

Bingbangbongbash · 25/09/2023 10:39

Not being investigated?

A google search for ‘excessive death’ brings up numerous articles in mainstream papers (Guardian, Times, Telegraph, New Statesmen) that discuss the recent upwards trend.

Some offer suggestions like more drug & alcohol use, poor mental health services, NHS on its knees, long term effects of Covid especially links to heart and lung issues, more people than ever being killed on the roads etc.

Others suggest it’s unclear what’s causing it.

But it’s hardly something being hidden or ignored.

Just because your cult leader says something, doesn’t make it true.

As I’ve said before, I’m not going to waste time wading through Brand’s verbal diarrhoea but I’m sure between us we can take any example of a conspiracy you want to give us and show the truth within a few clicks.

Are you joking!? Oh yes, there's been lots of coverage of those increases. However, none of those - with the exception of suicide - would cause a fit, healthy young man to just 'die suddenly' in his sleep. THAT'S the issue here. If you think this pattern is normal, you are beyond help.

On the topic of Brand's YT content, you are in absolutely NO position to affirm that he's a 'conspiracy theorist' if you refuse to watch any of his output. Otherwise, you are basically just spouting what you've been told to think by others. And I just can't engage with that. So, BingBang, I think we're done here.

monsteramunch · 25/09/2023 12:23

@Lazyusername

Her mother also drove her to Brand's house during the relationship.

What relevance does this have to whether or not a sexual assault took place?

It's been mentioned a few times but I can't work out what possible relevance it has.

monsteramunch · 25/09/2023 12:31

@Lazyusername

I feel we were led to believe this was a schoolgirl with no connection to him.

She was a stranger when he met her and approached her while she was shopping - are you thinking of someone else? What connection was there when they met? She was a stranger to him.

Her mother also drove her to Brand's house during the relationship.

What relevance does this have to whether or not she was assaulted?

I also have now seen the unredacted text sent by the woman who says, "no means no" (it's online if you search for it). On reading it in full it is not quite as presented on the TV show.

Could you share a link please as I can only find the attached which I don't think presents a different conversation, or any additional nuance, to that included in the TV show.

Russel has spoken
Its5656 · 25/09/2023 12:39

Is that text message supposed to prove innocence?
If you tell a man to use a condom and he doesn't that is rape.

IClaudine · 25/09/2023 12:43

Jumpingthruhoops · 25/09/2023 12:20

Are you joking!? Oh yes, there's been lots of coverage of those increases. However, none of those - with the exception of suicide - would cause a fit, healthy young man to just 'die suddenly' in his sleep. THAT'S the issue here. If you think this pattern is normal, you are beyond help.

On the topic of Brand's YT content, you are in absolutely NO position to affirm that he's a 'conspiracy theorist' if you refuse to watch any of his output. Otherwise, you are basically just spouting what you've been told to think by others. And I just can't engage with that. So, BingBang, I think we're done here.

However, none of those - with the exception of suicide - would cause a fit, healthy young man to just 'die suddenly' in his sleep

Sadly, there have always been cases of fit and healthy young people dying suddenly. Can you link to the data about young men dying in their sleep please?

www.c-r-y.org.uk/why-the-young-and-healthy-drop-dead/#:~:text=Every%20week%20in%20the%20UK,the%20peak%20of%20their%20lives.

IClaudine · 25/09/2023 12:46

That text message is so damning. Especially the part about him initially suggesting he make things up to her with more sex.

vlo · 25/09/2023 13:07

IClaudine · 25/09/2023 12:46

That text message is so damning. Especially the part about him initially suggesting he make things up to her with more sex.

I agree it’s damning, although I had read it differently – I thought he meant his original plan had been more sex, but this was before the incident they talk about in the text

IClaudine · 25/09/2023 13:14

vlo · 25/09/2023 13:07

I agree it’s damning, although I had read it differently – I thought he meant his original plan had been more sex, but this was before the incident they talk about in the text

Oh, maybe?

Bingbangbongbash · 25/09/2023 13:17

Jumpingthruhoops · 25/09/2023 12:20

Are you joking!? Oh yes, there's been lots of coverage of those increases. However, none of those - with the exception of suicide - would cause a fit, healthy young man to just 'die suddenly' in his sleep. THAT'S the issue here. If you think this pattern is normal, you are beyond help.

On the topic of Brand's YT content, you are in absolutely NO position to affirm that he's a 'conspiracy theorist' if you refuse to watch any of his output. Otherwise, you are basically just spouting what you've been told to think by others. And I just can't engage with that. So, BingBang, I think we're done here.

You’re going to need to bring some facts to the debate if you want to engage. Number of young, previously healthy young men who have died suddenly in their sleep, for a start. As a subset of this, we’ll need info on the cause of death - coroner’s report, if applicable. Then we can have a proper look. I assume all this info is readily available from the annotations in Brand’s diatribes?

I don’t need to watch his drivel to know he’s peddling bullshit conspiracy theories, but to give it a go, I watched the video on how Bill Gates investing in lab grown food being a big conspiracy to centralise the control of food, to further enslave the masses.

What a load of bollocks.

Also, bless you for thinking I’m responding to your inanity to try and change your mind or help you escape the cult. Classic. 🤣

Jumpingthruhoops · 25/09/2023 13:31

fettuccini · 25/09/2023 10:34

@Jumpingthruhoops do you think these women are lying about being raped and assaulted by RB?

Not 'lying' necessarily... but I do have strong suspicions that these women were perhaps 'leant on' somewhat, which may or may not have had an impact on their version of events. It's very nuanced.

Also, some of the testimony in the documentary didn't entirely 'ring true' in that they used the exact wording from the accompanying footage they showed from his stand-up gig from over 20 years ago. Which, for me, made it questionable.

Whatever REALLY happened, I'm resolute in my belief that anyone accused of such crimes, should stand trial - but NOT trial by media.

Jumpingthruhoops · 25/09/2023 13:35

Lazyusername · 25/09/2023 10:58

@fettuccini I think what a lot of people are saying is that we have not seen the full evidence yet and there is a legal process to be followed. I am hoping these women will now go to the police and the truth will be uncovered.

I am not saying I disbelieve these women but I cannot say I can take everything that is said on a TV show as gospel. That is not a good way for society to operate.

People who say they believe any woman, no matter what they say I'm sorry but I just don't. I could name any person I know now and say they raped me and some people say they would just believe it. But that person hasn't raped me. There needs to be evidence which is examined in a court of law.

With regard to the TV show; I have posted before to say that the sensationalist way this was all presented with the teaser videos, online hints, dramatic music etc. made me feel uncomfortable as to whether the motive was simply to expose wrongdoing. It was more like a Roman "bread and circuses" type production or the "Five Minute Hate" in Orwell's 1984.

I don't even think many of the public realised they were seeing actors on the documentary.

I also did not realise myself until reading further that "Alice" was working for Channel 4 at the time of the incident she describes on Big Brother's Big Mouth which was presented by Russell Brand. I feel we were led to believe this was a schoolgirl with no connection to him. Her mother also drove her to Brand's house during the relationship.

I also have now seen the unredacted text sent by the woman who says, "no means no" (it's online if you search for it). On reading it in full it is not quite as presented on the TV show.

This is why a TV spectacular on this was not the way to go and why people on this thread saying, "I never liked him, he is hairy, dirty-looking" etc. are ridiculous.

I've been a juror on a rape trial at which we found the defendant guilty. A major, major thing in such a trial is to hear the full evidence from both parties and to see them, hear them speak and watch their facial expressions and make a judgement as to what is the truth.

Let the courts decide. Otherwise it is nothing but a witch hunt.

100% this!

I don't know what parts of this, as you so eloquently describe it, people are struggling to understand.

Jumpingthruhoops · 25/09/2023 13:36

browneyes77 · 25/09/2023 08:15

No. It isn’t.

He specifically chose the words “All of my relationships were consensual”.

He did not say “All of my relationships AND sexual encounters were consensual”.

🤦🏼‍♀️

Jumpingthruhoops · 25/09/2023 13:42

IClaudine · 25/09/2023 12:43

However, none of those - with the exception of suicide - would cause a fit, healthy young man to just 'die suddenly' in his sleep

Sadly, there have always been cases of fit and healthy young people dying suddenly. Can you link to the data about young men dying in their sleep please?

www.c-r-y.org.uk/why-the-young-and-healthy-drop-dead/#:~:text=Every%20week%20in%20the%20UK,the%20peak%20of%20their%20lives.

Indeed there have... but the number is frankly minuscule, not weekly headlines like we've been seeing.

As for data, easiest thing to do is Google 'died suddenly' and see how many search results come up (clue: it's a LOT). Also, Dr John Campbell on YouTube has studied lots of peer-reviewed papers on this subject, so all the data you need is there.

IClaudine · 25/09/2023 13:46

Jumpingthruhoops · 25/09/2023 13:42

Indeed there have... but the number is frankly minuscule, not weekly headlines like we've been seeing.

As for data, easiest thing to do is Google 'died suddenly' and see how many search results come up (clue: it's a LOT). Also, Dr John Campbell on YouTube has studied lots of peer-reviewed papers on this subject, so all the data you need is there.

So you haven't looked at the actual data yourself?

WomblingTree86 · 25/09/2023 13:48

Jumpingthruhoops · 25/09/2023 12:20

Are you joking!? Oh yes, there's been lots of coverage of those increases. However, none of those - with the exception of suicide - would cause a fit, healthy young man to just 'die suddenly' in his sleep. THAT'S the issue here. If you think this pattern is normal, you are beyond help.

On the topic of Brand's YT content, you are in absolutely NO position to affirm that he's a 'conspiracy theorist' if you refuse to watch any of his output. Otherwise, you are basically just spouting what you've been told to think by others. And I just can't engage with that. So, BingBang, I think we're done here.

Unfortunately, young fit (or thought to be) people do suddenly die in their sleep due to a heart arrythmia. It happened to a friend of mine many years ago. It's not new and didn't start after covid-19 vaccination. Have you never heard of it?

Its5656 · 25/09/2023 13:48

Indeed there have... but the number is frankly minuscule, not weekly headlines like we've been seeing.

As for data, easiest thing to do is Google 'died suddenly' and see how many search results come up (clue: it's a LOT). Also, Dr John Campbell on YouTube has studied lots of peer-reviewed papers on this subject, so all the data you need is there.

@Jumpingthruhoops

So Brands not really speaking out about news that is being hidden from the rest of us. You haven't answered my question, if this all a conspiracy about him revealing the truth how do you explain the fact that the allegations go back 20 years?

IClaudine · 25/09/2023 13:49

Indeed there have... but the number is frankly minuscule, not weekly headlines like we've been seeing

Did you not read the link @Jumpingthruhoops ? Approx 12 people under 35 die each week from sudden cardiac death.

WomblingTree86 · 25/09/2023 13:53

Jumpingthruhoops · 25/09/2023 13:42

Indeed there have... but the number is frankly minuscule, not weekly headlines like we've been seeing.

As for data, easiest thing to do is Google 'died suddenly' and see how many search results come up (clue: it's a LOT). Also, Dr John Campbell on YouTube has studied lots of peer-reviewed papers on this subject, so all the data you need is there.

Lol, so you are taking the word of a retired nurse antivaxxer who is making millions bullshitting on youtube. He cherry picks and misinterprets data. Try looking and studying the data for yourself if you can.

squareyedannie · 25/09/2023 13:55

When did this thread devolve into wacky vax theories?
It's pointless as both sides will never agree.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.