I am begining to wonder if some people are purposefully distorting the facts.
Watch the second video posted here. Whatever her reason for removing the goods, the fact remains she tried to leave without paying for them. She then behaved incredibly aggressively when the shopkeeer tried to stop her taking the unpaid goods. He walks away from her and SHE goes after him.
Just as I stated earlier, the shopkeeper was under absolutely no requirement to exchange non faulty goods. I also imagine there is a backstory here also. Most will exchange like for like providing there is a proof of purchase.
BasicPumpkinSpice
What deadly force was carried out?, he pushes her from behind and then holds her by the upper arms. The only time his hands were anywhere near her neck was when she was struggling and hitting him.
As for a shopkeeper accepting thefts. Yes they accept it happens. No they should not accept it happening right in front of them, and I cannot believe any shopkeeper would of just stood aside.
Have a read of this link:
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-ugly-truth-about-the-peckham-shop-scuffle/
and in particular this statement that is on one of the posters placed on the store since:
Other posters point to simmering tensions in the area: ‘It’s not just this store, it’s all of them on the strip!! Black owned only’; ‘If you have been assulted (sic) by any store in Peckham contact Raspact Rebellion’.
Isn't that actually a racist statement in itself?