Villain (if wrongdoing is proven).
As demonstrated by this thread I think a lot of people are confused about the money raised by Sir Tom, which did go to the NHS and money raised by the Foundation his daughter created after his death.
In creating the Foundation she capitalised on her father's "brand" and has allegedly personally profited from doing so in the form of payments for attending events as CEO of the Foundation, that were paid to a totally different company owned by her/her husband, requesting a totally unrealistic salary plus the whole bloody spa that was meant to be an office for the foundation.
These actions, if correct have not just sullied her reputation but that of her father as well.
People will forget (or already have) that his goal was to raise money for the NHS, which he achieved and only connect him with events that happened after he died and I think that's pretty sad (and pretty damn exploitative of the memory of someone you claim to have loved).
Additionally, because of that (and again evidenced by this thread) it will put people off donating to charity in the future possibly to the tune of far more than Sir Tom raised, so another pretty shit legacy that is far removed from her father's intentions.