Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask why people are so against giving up meat?

1000 replies

NewCracker · 04/07/2023 21:12

Just that really, why are people so against giving up meat?
Without a doubt we know it's better for the environment, we know it's better for our health, we know it's better for animal welfare and it's actually quite expensive. But still as soon as you mention to the greater public about cutting their meat consumption, they get defensive and almost offended.
Would you ever consider giving it up, if you do consume it now? If not, why not?
I'm expecting some hate, this is MN after all, but I am genuinely just curious. Not trying to rattle feathers.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
Lismore · 05/07/2023 11:49

Because it is a great part of a balanced non-UPF diet that we omnivorous humans enjoy.

The processed veggie/ vegan alternatives are pretty depressing, but make lots of money for ‘big food’.

OchonAgusOchonOh · 05/07/2023 11:53

I disagree with your claim that giving up meat is necessarily better for our health. Good quality meat is better than over-processed, crappy fake meat. Many people who give up meat move on to the fake crap.

I also disagree on your claim that it is necessarily better for the environment. If you eat local, good quality, free-range meat, it probably has a smaller carbon footprint than much of the fake meat or, for that matter, veg that is flown half way across the world.

I am vegetarian. I don't eat meat. I also don't eat fake meat or other over-processed food. The current vegan trend has resulted in many restaurants serving fake meat as the veggie option, which really annoys me.

CuriouslyDifferent · 05/07/2023 11:54

Wanderingowl · 05/07/2023 10:55

No, no, no. If anything that happens beyond a preschooler's understanding of food production, ie, cow dies for people to eat cow, then it doesn't happen and we don't have to consider it.

Tbf, I was genuinely shocked when I, as an older adult, realised just how many animals die, often really, really horrible deaths, in the production of grain and vegetables. Though when the surprise recedes it does fade into, well of course they do. Once you start to think it through, it is obvious that it's not just vast amounts of living creatures that die from that kind of food production, but the scale of biodiversity that is wiped out in plant farming. Meat eating leads to deliberate, preplanned animal death, there is no denying that. And even as an avowed omnivore, I fully understand why people don't feel comfortable with that. But plant farming leads to massive collateral damage on a scale not present with meat farming. And that collateral damage includes an awful lot of unplanned animal death, the fact that people don't then go on to eat those dead animals doesn't change that.

This.

Some of these vegans need to travel through the thousands of miles of wheat and corn production in France, to understand the impact of this style of farming. It’s like something out of science fiction.

Reading some of these posts, I’ve come to realise that some vegans are the woke of the food world, using their language and narratives, to try and belittle anyone who has a different opinion. I haven’t seen them call anyone a Nazi yet, but it wouldn’t surprise me. I have seen ‘climate’ ‘cancer’ and ‘animal welfare’ used to prop up their arguments. the usual scaremongering arguments, repeated from sales and marketing literature.

When you dig into the background of researchers and organisations in support of veganism, you usually final an animal rights founder or a plant based food producer funding research. Not that any of the above is criminal and things overlap - but everyone has an agenda and sadly, many people are dumb enough to take sales and marketing at face value.

it’s taken nearly 50 years for Nuclear energy to recover from the damage done by the oil and gas lobby.

HadalyEve · 05/07/2023 11:54

Thebestwaytoscareatory · 05/07/2023 11:38

Sure cutting out meat will reduce your carbon footprint. But how many vegans still use a car? Fly in a plane? Etc. Nope that's not a persuasive argument to stop eating meat

Diet choice is one of the most significant impactors on the environment, with meat based diets being the worst, and are much more damaging to environment than transport choices. If animal agriculture was phased out rapidly it would stabalise ghg emissions for the next 3 decades and provide around 60% of the emissions reducing required to achieve the Paris Agreement targets.

https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/15/4110

https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pclm.0000010

Meat is a fantastic source of protein, essential amino acids, iron... Nope that's not a persuasive argument to stop eating meat

It is but, it is not required to be eaten at the levels most people in developed countries eat it at. A plant based diet is better for overall and long term health.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1906908116

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542519622002431

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6316289/

The animals are only given birth because will will eat them. Without people eating them farmers would stop raising cows, chickens, sheep, pigs. Breeds of the animals would be lost...Nope that's not a persuasive argument to stop eating meat

That's a really bizarre arguement on many levels. First, we don't eat badgers, squirrels, foxes, frogs, otters, seagulls, etc., in this country and they all exist quite happily. Secondly, most live stock is raised to get from birth to slaughter house as quickly and as big as possible, there's no conservation elements. Third, I'm not sure arguing that something should continue to be brought into existence just to be horribly killed a few weeks - months later is a solid arguement for anything. Finally, intensive animal agricult has a negative impact on other species, so if your concern is centred around biodiversity eating meat is not a great idea.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095965261931131X#sec3

So are a lot of things. What business of it of yours how I spend my money? ...Nope that's not a persuasive argument to stop eating meat

It may not be an issue for but in a country with an ever increasing number of people struggling with CoL providing cheap, accessible, easy to prepare / eat food and encouraging people to adopt a diet that focus on those types of ingredients is a good idea, especially when doing so provides other benefits around health and environment.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(21)00251-5/fulltext

Because you'll telling another adult how to live! You're criticizing their choices? Did they ask for your opinion? Just stop

That happens in many aspects of your life every single day, especially when there are wider impacts associated with your actions. Nobody is going to force you to change but at least accept the reality of your choices and stop being such a snowflake about it.

So most of what you posted is flawed.
For example you say A plant based diet is better for overall and long term health. and then post links to scientific papers that show that a “plant rich diet” is best- a plant rich diet has some meat in it.

Secondly, the paper you posted conclusion that the vegan diet is best for the environment defined “best for the environment” as lowest greenhouse gas emissions. The environment and our climate depends on dozens more things in addition to greenhouse gas emissions so this definition is extremely flawed because it ignores the damage to the environment on other, equally important environmental factors such as ecosystems, soil health, food chain disruption, wildlife extinction, higher pollution from pesticides and artificial fertilisers and so on.

IAmSalmaFuckingHayek · 05/07/2023 11:58

Wanderingowl · 05/07/2023 11:39

There are quite a lot of climate scientists who disagree with the current dogma though. There is a lot of largely ignored evidence to show that the current 'science' is built around faulty datasets. Really, really faulty data. Then the conclusions drawn from the 'science' built around the faulty data are over exaggerated. Those who point out that faulty data is being used speak of how they are hounded into silence with threats of job loss and withdrawn funding. Increasing numbers of scientists are starting to speak out about it but are widely ignored.

At first when I started seeing this, I largely ignored it and figured they were fringe scientists ignoring reality in favour of being able to deny a horrible reality. However, what I can't help but notice, is the similarities between those scientists who speak against the 'climate consensus' and those biologists who state there are two sexes. And then I realise that we know for a fact that there are cases where the 'scientific consensus dogma' is out and out bullshit as everyone has always known that there are indeed only two sexes. We don't need biologists to tell us this, yet the biologists who do, have their career's derailed. And that makes me wonder, if that dogma is willing to lie so strongly against somethings we can all see is a lie. Then why wouldn't there be a similar scenario happening with a type of science that the public is less able to decipher the truth of.

I'm not saying human industry isn't having a catastrophic effect on the world we live on. But I am saying that when we know the 'consensus' can be built around lies that profit certain large corporations, why wouldn't that be happening in this scenario too. And then all you have to do is look at the supposed evidence that animal agriculture is worse for the environment and it's very, very obvious that the conclusions are drawn for data so one-sided that it's worthless. While at the same time vegan alternatives are incredibly, incredibly cheap to produce as opposed to meat and dairy. Large food production companies massively increase their profits, in the short term at least, as more people switch to vegan or cut back on meat and dairy.

So we're looking at evidence that clearly comes from nonsense data, that stands to make large corporations significant profit all while living through a culture where scientific consensus is known to, at least sometimes, be achieved through widespread bullying and a culture of fear.

Excellent post.

Wanderingowl · 05/07/2023 12:01

HadalyEve · 05/07/2023 11:54

So most of what you posted is flawed.
For example you say A plant based diet is better for overall and long term health. and then post links to scientific papers that show that a “plant rich diet” is best- a plant rich diet has some meat in it.

Secondly, the paper you posted conclusion that the vegan diet is best for the environment defined “best for the environment” as lowest greenhouse gas emissions. The environment and our climate depends on dozens more things in addition to greenhouse gas emissions so this definition is extremely flawed because it ignores the damage to the environment on other, equally important environmental factors such as ecosystems, soil health, food chain disruption, wildlife extinction, higher pollution from pesticides and artificial fertilisers and so on.

As far as I know 'plant based diet' was never originally intended to mean vegan. That is a relatively recent change in language use. Originally, a plant based diet meant an omnivore who eats a wide array of fruit and vegetables, a reasonable amount of dairy and meat with a small amount of grains and little to no processed foods. Like a near inverse of the food pyramid. So yes, plant based diets are almost certainly the absolute best for your long term health. But only if you are using it to mean healthy omnivore who eats lots of plants. And it shouldn't even need science to prove really, as it's just common sense.

RoyalGala · 05/07/2023 12:01

Fernbreeze · 05/07/2023 11:48

Here's some thing for you to consider those animals had a far better life then most would do in nature, The total amount of suffering per year in the natural world is beyond all decent contemplation. During the time it took you to write that, thousands of animals were being eaten alive; others were running for their lives, whimpering with fear; others are being slowly devoured from within by rasping parasites; thousands of all kinds are dying of starvation, thirst and disease.

This number vastly exceeds that of animals on factory farms, in laboratories, or kept as pets.

So we can all use shocking stories to try justify our choices, nature and life is not fair and its unreasonable to expect it to be fluffy fluffy land.

I don’t agree with any of your post. It’s not a shocking story, it’s real life and what I witnessed, OP asked a question and I answered the question.

OMGitsnotgood · 05/07/2023 12:02

I like the taste of meat. Cutting out meat would reduce the variety of foods we can eat. It's extremely difficult to obtain as much iron from plant based sources.

That said, I fully understand why people don't eat meat. I'll be totally honest and say if I allowed myself to think about it a lot I'd probably stop eating meat, but don't want to for the reasons outlined above.

BansheeofInisherin · 05/07/2023 12:03

You know, you could defeat Big Industry and their evil designations by just eating vegetables more often? Local ones? Of which there are plenty.

The choice is not between eating meat at every meal or eating fake meat with a garnish of avocados at every meal. It's between eating meat less often and eating more veggies.

HadalyEve · 05/07/2023 12:03

First, we don't eat badgers, squirrels, foxes, frogs, otters, seagulls, etc., in this country and they all exist quite happily. Not in areas where monocropping of plant crops occurs. And make no mistake, replacing grazing land with monocropping (and you have to or let billions of humans starve to death) would push many species to extinction. I don’t know why you even mentioned seagulls to be honest in your list.

Secondly, most live stock is raised to get from birth to slaughter house as quickly and as big as possible, there's no conservation elements.
The fact they are born, live and then die versus not existing is de facto conservation. They also cannot survive in the wild any more than a persons pet dog can. So even if there were habitat for them, and we simply abandoned them, they’d die.

Third, I'm not sure arguing that something should continue to be brought into existence just to be horribly killed a few weeks - months later is a solid arguement for anything. The average lifespan of a U.K. farm cow is 5-6yrs.

Finally, intensive animal agricult has a negative impact on other species, so if your concern is centred around biodiversity eating meat is not a great idea. This is simply ignorance. Grazing land has far more biodiversity and supports far more wildlife species from butterflies to reptiles to birds to mammals than any fields with plant crops. It is second best behind wilderness/preserve lands.

Fernbreeze · 05/07/2023 12:05

RoyalGala · 05/07/2023 12:01

I don’t agree with any of your post. It’s not a shocking story, it’s real life and what I witnessed, OP asked a question and I answered the question.

The point you don't agree with my post does not make it not factual. Care to point out where my post is inaccurate then?

fyn · 05/07/2023 12:07

Soubriquet · 05/07/2023 10:26

Farmers would do crops instead of raising animals and once the animals they have die, they won’t breed anymore. Different breeds of livestock will go extinct because they aren’t needed anymore

This is what will happen though, it shows an absolute misunderstanding of agriculture.

This map shows the general land classification for the UK. The blue areas are where you can grow fruit and veg, predominantly the Grade 1 darker blue. Light blue will be root vegetables, no soft fruits or salad veg and lower yield.

The green you see for most of the country is Grade 3, the best of it (3a) you can do grains, potatoes, sugar beet etc… the rest is mostly high yield grass for animals. The remainder is basically no crops, only good for grass grazing.

Feed into this, to keep those top grades producing well they need fertilising, crop rotations with grass and clover leys to fix nitrogen, cattle to walk on it and urinate on it to help soil health and structure.

Unless you really like eating grass, farmers can’t just plant food where cattle graze. They can’t just plant fruit and veg where they grow cattle feed. Such wild misinformation to say farmers will just plant crops where animals are.

To ask why people are so against giving up meat?
fyn · 05/07/2023 12:08

*isn’t what will happen

HadalyEve · 05/07/2023 12:10

fyn · 05/07/2023 12:07

This is what will happen though, it shows an absolute misunderstanding of agriculture.

This map shows the general land classification for the UK. The blue areas are where you can grow fruit and veg, predominantly the Grade 1 darker blue. Light blue will be root vegetables, no soft fruits or salad veg and lower yield.

The green you see for most of the country is Grade 3, the best of it (3a) you can do grains, potatoes, sugar beet etc… the rest is mostly high yield grass for animals. The remainder is basically no crops, only good for grass grazing.

Feed into this, to keep those top grades producing well they need fertilising, crop rotations with grass and clover leys to fix nitrogen, cattle to walk on it and urinate on it to help soil health and structure.

Unless you really like eating grass, farmers can’t just plant food where cattle graze. They can’t just plant fruit and veg where they grow cattle feed. Such wild misinformation to say farmers will just plant crops where animals are.

Excellent post and it’s worth mentioning even the grass depends on the grazing of cows & sheep to propagate and survive.

Alyso · 05/07/2023 12:10

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Alyso · 05/07/2023 12:12

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Curledupwithabook · 05/07/2023 12:12

Appreciate this is anecdotal, but I was vegetarian for nearly twenty years, vegan for two. Nowi eat meat, and probably eat more than most.

My health is better. I'm stronger, I have more energy. I tried to eat healthily as a veggie, cooked from scratch a lot, and especially as vegan (it was before the days of there being vegan processed options)

I simply couldn't eat enough calories as a veggie. I was underweight and had some associated health problems with it. Osteoarthritis runs in my family and was a risk for me.

Now I eat meat, I still cook mainly from scratch and I have more energy, no weight related health issues, I'm physically stronger.

I do question the research on meat being unhealthy if it's chosen well and cooked well and part of a well balanced diet (ie with enough veg/legumes/variety)

hamstersarse · 05/07/2023 12:12

@RoyalGala

Do you drink Almond Milk?

How do you feel about the billions of bees that are killed to produce that product?

As has been pointed out, the scenes you describe will not have happened in the UK, or if they did, that farm will have absolutely been closed down. But you do have to confront the fact that animals die whichever way you eat; it is not more virtuous to eat vegan.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jan/07/honeybees-deaths-almonds-hives-aoe

'Like sending bees to war': the deadly truth behind your almond milk obsession

Bees are essential to the functioning of America’s titanic almond industry – and billions are dying in the process

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jan/07/honeybees-deaths-almonds-hives-aoe

hamstersarse · 05/07/2023 12:13

Curledupwithabook · 05/07/2023 12:12

Appreciate this is anecdotal, but I was vegetarian for nearly twenty years, vegan for two. Nowi eat meat, and probably eat more than most.

My health is better. I'm stronger, I have more energy. I tried to eat healthily as a veggie, cooked from scratch a lot, and especially as vegan (it was before the days of there being vegan processed options)

I simply couldn't eat enough calories as a veggie. I was underweight and had some associated health problems with it. Osteoarthritis runs in my family and was a risk for me.

Now I eat meat, I still cook mainly from scratch and I have more energy, no weight related health issues, I'm physically stronger.

I do question the research on meat being unhealthy if it's chosen well and cooked well and part of a well balanced diet (ie with enough veg/legumes/variety)

It isn't anecdotal. Meat is a requirement for many micronutrients that humans need to optimise their health

Soubriquet · 05/07/2023 12:14

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Definitely not true. I’ve seen some absolute bullshit coming out of vegans mouths including shit like their baby doesn’t need sun cream because she’s raising the baby vegan… not quite sure how that works but there we go

EsmeSusanOgg · 05/07/2023 12:14

It tastes nice. It is easier to have a diabetic friendly diet using meat and fish than it as a vegetarian. I like veggie food, but I am lactose intolerant and most plant-based dairy alternatives are incredibly bad for my sugars.

RoyalGala · 05/07/2023 12:18

Fernbreeze · 05/07/2023 12:05

The point you don't agree with my post does not make it not factual. Care to point out where my post is inaccurate then?

Your point is a bit like saying:

A woman is being abused by her partner but at least she has a home.

A child who is living in poverty is being sold to a 45 year old man to marry, at least she will not be living in poverty.

It’s a low standard and you are invalidating the human or animal in question. Denying basic standards is a moral issue.

EsmeSusanOgg · 05/07/2023 12:18

I mean, there is no need to have meat or fish every day. I think looking at sustainable options is the way forward. Intense farming is not good for the environment. But that doesn't mean everyone needs to go vegan/ veggie. There is a balance!

Fernbreeze · 05/07/2023 12:21

RoyalGala · 05/07/2023 12:18

Your point is a bit like saying:

A woman is being abused by her partner but at least she has a home.

A child who is living in poverty is being sold to a 45 year old man to marry, at least she will not be living in poverty.

It’s a low standard and you are invalidating the human or animal in question. Denying basic standards is a moral issue.

So you are not disputing my facts, also please do me a favour reply to my previous posts as you would be the only non meat eater to reply to them.

You seem to have very selective replies I wonder why, I thought you wanted to promote your meat free diet.

Although you will not answer them as you obviously cannot.

RoyalGala · 05/07/2023 12:21

hamstersarse · 05/07/2023 12:12

@RoyalGala

Do you drink Almond Milk?

How do you feel about the billions of bees that are killed to produce that product?

As has been pointed out, the scenes you describe will not have happened in the UK, or if they did, that farm will have absolutely been closed down. But you do have to confront the fact that animals die whichever way you eat; it is not more virtuous to eat vegan.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jan/07/honeybees-deaths-almonds-hives-aoe

I don’t drink almond milk.

They were in-fact in the UK, you could research it.

I am not denying nothing dies for me to eat.

BUT I will not buy into an industry that relies on the systematic abuse and slaughtering of billions of animals every year.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.