ITV has a problem. If they get litigatious with MN they risk spiralling calls for an investigation for abuse of power.
Getting litigatious with MN would look like more of the same. It risks even more reputational damage.
They know this. MN knows this. I know this. Other posters know this.
And in court you can argue the public interest defence on this pretty easily at this point.
The question of why ITV didn't see an issue with such a junior member of staff going onstage at an award ceremony as part of an investigation into whether the relationship between him and Schofield was inappropriate, ain't going away.
It's the sticking point for ITV in terms of duty of care responsibilities. Even if both parties are saying nothing is happening, is that what was happening? Potential signs of coercive control should be on their radar.
Eamonn's accusation about cars paid for by ITV feeds into this too. I doubt Eamonn would suggest this even now, unless he was pretty confident of this. ITV almost have to disprove this now rather than go legal to silence.
Again Eamonn's carefully worded point about coercive control without actually naming the person is relevant here. It's a legal dodge, but makes an important point that ITV can't ignore and their legal team can't do much about. It's asking a question rather than making an accusation in practice.