Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Holly willoboughly

828 replies

midnightblue12 · 27/05/2023 21:03

Ok I know I've spelt her surname wrong... but here we are. We all know who I'm talking about!

I just don't understand why social media has turned on her, almost blaiming her for allowing Phillip S antics to go on?

Why is she responsible for his actions????

And for those saying "she must've known"... maybe she didn't! Maybe she kept out of it or maybe she didn't know the full one and puts.
Why so she being Blaine's. Am I missing something??!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
TeaKitten · 28/05/2023 09:46

Newmumatlast · 28/05/2023 07:53

People can choose whether they work with someone or not. If they cannot choose by convincing the network, they can choose not to take the work. But people want to make money and often put money first. Thats why so many other open secrets go untold publicly/arent acted properly upon. I'm not saying that is what happened here as I couldn't possibly know. But it does seem from what other people in the industry are saying that it was known and therefore hard to see how she didn't know. It would be wrong to just blame her though. He is the one responsible for his actions. Her responsibility would extend to her choice of association if she knew/failure to flag it. Same with others in the industry. Anyone saying it was known needs to ask themselves what they did.

I think it’s stupid that people think she should have given up her job and damaged her career because ITV didnt want to fire this man and wanted to cover it up. Do you think every other woman in the building that worked closely with him should have quit too? It would have achieved nothing, ITV were the problem if they new about it.

Loveduvetdays · 28/05/2023 09:48

HW was manipulated by PS. I have been in a similar position (different context). She was a loyal friend to him for years before this happened. We are outsiders looking in on the situation, so it's very easy to judge/be objective of what's right and wrong. She was probably being lied to and manipulated by PS but didn't realise until recently. She will be feeling betrayed and foolish. I wish I had said my piece when I was in that position. I get so angry now that I didn't. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. I'm sure HW will be feeling the same. Problem is for her, she is famous, I'm not. Give her some slack and understanding.

TeaYarn · 28/05/2023 09:52

TeaKitten · 28/05/2023 09:46

I think it’s stupid that people think she should have given up her job and damaged her career because ITV didnt want to fire this man and wanted to cover it up. Do you think every other woman in the building that worked closely with him should have quit too? It would have achieved nothing, ITV were the problem if they new about it.

She damaged her career by standing by him for years. She is damaging her career right now by putting out disingenuous statements. If she had stepped down before he was pushed she would’ve kept her reputation in tact and people would be congratulating her on her integrity.

Cam22 · 28/05/2023 09:53

Swrigh1234 · 28/05/2023 09:45

She knew, did nothing. And then concocted this act that she was outraged and didn’t like him these last few months, when she saw his popularity tumble.

And she’s a crap presenter to boot.

Exactly. She’s utterly transparent and stupid enough to believe people will believe her version. Pathetic woman.

BonnieBobbin · 28/05/2023 09:55

I don't think HW acted differently in the last few weeks because PS' popularity was dipping. I think she was incadescent that PS let his brother be in the company of her DCs when PS knew about his brother's criminal behaviour with children. That was probably the step too far that made her take a stand.
She also might have known that the runner was getting ready to tell the truth about their affair (as other people seemed to know it was coming).
An age-gap 'romance' suddenly looked very different when PS' brother was convicted.

Cam22 · 28/05/2023 09:56

Give her “some slack and understanding.”
What a joke.

TeaYarn · 28/05/2023 09:59

There is a disgusting tone on MN about this. It’s like they want to normalise women turing a blind eye to sexual misconduct. I wonder what the agenda is?

Mirabai · 28/05/2023 09:59

Cam22 · 28/05/2023 09:53

Exactly. She’s utterly transparent and stupid enough to believe people will believe her version. Pathetic woman.

Some of the comments on these threads are infantile.

No-one knows for sure what goes on behind closed doors. There’s no way PS would tell her the truth. So all HW would have had is the same rumours everyone else heard and his lie that they were untrue.

I’ve said this before that if women had to resign every time we have to work with arseholes we’d all be out of a job.

Mirabai · 28/05/2023 10:00

TeaYarn · 28/05/2023 09:59

There is a disgusting tone on MN about this. It’s like they want to normalise women turing a blind eye to sexual misconduct. I wonder what the agenda is?

The agenda is anti-misogynist: holding men accountable for their own crimes not the nearest available woman.

Housewife2010 · 28/05/2023 10:01

TeaKitten · 27/05/2023 21:19

Even if she did no that he’s a creep, it was common knowledge and ITV wouldn’t act on it, so what was she suppose to do? Throw away her career and ability to feed her kids? And what would that have achieved? What exactly was her crime? If everyone at itv new why not shut down the channel rather than blaming one woman?

If Holly's career was ended today, I highly doubt that her children would go hungry.

CherryCokeFanatic · 28/05/2023 10:03

She needs to go

Inkanta · 28/05/2023 10:05

I think in workplaces it's rare that managers know how to deal with bullies or people like PS. Usually everyone just leaves if they can. I'm pleased the press got hold of this and ITV had to act in the end. I do think PS was surrounded by enablers and everyone knew.

TeaYarn · 28/05/2023 10:06

Mirabai · 28/05/2023 10:00

The agenda is anti-misogynist: holding men accountable for their own crimes not the nearest available woman.

You don’t think PS is being held accountable? He has been pushed from his job, the press are reporting on it and it’s clear they are building up to a bigger story.

How much more accountable would you like PS to be held?

Why should his presenting partner who stood by him and is now putting out laughably disingenuous statements to distance herself from what she knew be protected from people discussing her online? She is an adult after all.

LostFrog · 28/05/2023 10:06

I think she is becoming a scapegoat here. I agree that people are losing perspective on what has actually happened and her part in it.

dayswithaY · 28/05/2023 10:08

When there’s an office affair going on, everyone knows about it - even when the two people concerned think they don’t.

How did Eamonn, Ruth, Dan Wootton and possibly Rylan all know about the “affair” but Holly didn’t? Eammon even says he complained to bosses about it.

I might believe it if P met MM in a bar one night and they mainly met at P’s house but MM arrived at the studios in a highly coveted role as runner. He would have been introduced as P’s protégé from the drama school he sponsored. He would be known as Phil’s pal, and Holly - as P’s BFF would have been fully aware of their developing “relationship”.

Apparently it ended badly - when MM was transferred to Loose Women and Ruth Langsford complained about his treatment- again, all without Holly’s knowledge.

You can’t say you’re someone’s BFF for years, holiday together, cry and cuddle on the sofa - then claim you didn’t know about his private life. Holly, really! It’s like Dec saying he didn’t know Ant liked a drink.

She’s been very unwise to lie. P is now like a trapped rat and may start to fight back and drop her in it. Ditto Eamonn who seems to be a loose cannon right now, plus P’s agency who just dropped him - Holly left them acrimoniously, so they may have an axe to grind with her.

Also, if this relationship really was unwise but not illegal- why the fuck did he lie to everyone about it? If everyone is so cool about a 50 plus man “dating” a teenager who he got a prestigious job for - what’s the problem, why lie to your employers and co-workers?

Holly will be the next to go.

justasking111 · 28/05/2023 10:09

I've known workplace bullies and sexual pests. Back in the 70s I reported my boss to the big bosses secretary and was fired. So kept my head down after that

sunshinesupermum · 28/05/2023 10:17

Frankly Holly ought to move to another station and start afresh if she wants to salvage her own career. She probably took PS at his word - they were besties, after all. Eventually with his brother's conviction the truth was going to come out especially as MM no longer wanted to participate in the lie and told his lawyer as much. ITV are tainted by what they knew or didn't - it no longer matters. The programme is tainted whoever presents it now.

Inkanta · 28/05/2023 10:17

How did Eamonn, Ruth, Dan Wootton and possibly Rylan all know about the “affair” but Holly didn’t
Yes I think that's nearer the truth of the matter.

Backtothegym · 28/05/2023 10:22

Inkanta · 28/05/2023 10:17

How did Eamonn, Ruth, Dan Wootton and possibly Rylan all know about the “affair” but Holly didn’t
Yes I think that's nearer the truth of the matter.

But they didn’t know. And they have never said they knew. They may have suspected. But at no point until after it was revealed did anyone of those folks say they knew or quit because of it. Not one. Saying it after is very different and even eamon with his vitriol has never actually said he knew.

Backtothegym · 28/05/2023 10:24

How did Eamonn, Ruth, Dan Wootton and possibly Rylan all know about the “affair” but Holly didn’t? Eammon even says he complained to bosses about it

no he didn’t say that, he reported gossip and speculation and itv investigated both parties denied it. Strenuously. There was no evidence, you cannot fire someone based on suspicion and rumour. It is illegal

Mrsjayy · 28/05/2023 10:24

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Stellawella · 28/05/2023 10:25

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

What source is this please.

Stellawella · 28/05/2023 10:26

CherryCokeFanatic · 28/05/2023 10:03

She needs to go

Why?

Mirabai · 28/05/2023 10:26

TeaYarn · 28/05/2023 10:06

You don’t think PS is being held accountable? He has been pushed from his job, the press are reporting on it and it’s clear they are building up to a bigger story.

How much more accountable would you like PS to be held?

Why should his presenting partner who stood by him and is now putting out laughably disingenuous statements to distance herself from what she knew be protected from people discussing her online? She is an adult after all.

Where did I say thought that?

Where did I say anything about online protection either?

PS is an adult male and solely responsible for his own behaviour.

Mrsjayy · 28/05/2023 10:27

Stellawella · 28/05/2023 10:25

What source is this please.

Sorry I'm trying to find it dh said he had a notification on his ipad, but I can't find it .