Would you sleep with a male partner in women's underwear

[Saladdressed]

Curious because of previous experience! What would you do if your partner said he liked wearing women's underwear (pants/stockings) and wanted to wear during sex? I said no thanks!
IABU - don't care if he wants to wear it/find it sexy

IANBU - keep it for solo wanking/eeeeewwww

No. The idea gives me the absolute ick.

Just my normals. Lolling at the pearl clutchers, we just had a laugh!

Not a chance. It would completely turn me off

@TedMullins Him not being a "real man" in my eyes is my opinion of him and I'm not going to change it. The vision of him dressed like that seriously disturbed me for a long time. In fact, it frightened me. I do have respect for other people, that's why I wouldn't shock a new partner or an old partner, by springing something like that on them without warning, like he did to me. A "real man" to me is someone who takes his partner's feelings into consideration and this selfish creep most certainly didn't do that.

To the OP: No

There was a crossdressing dress and now this.

If he bought them himself...?

Certainly not if they were another woman's, and as a one off I'd laugh. Not if it was all the time though, it would get wearisome.

I still have some boxers from an ex years back as he threw my knickers somewhere and we couldn't find them in the morning so he gave me the boxers to go home. If a new partner didn't like me wearing them I'd bin them instantly but I'd never wear them around him anyway as it wouldn't feel right.

I have to ask, what are your ‘normals’ if he likes going full Brad Majors?

I don’t think ‘pearl clutchers’ is right, it’s just it really doesn’t do it for most posters on here. Me included. I’m not shocked by it, or even horrified, beyond the image in my head of my actual H, which makes me feel a bit spewy.

I prefer him in the nud, as nature intended, not like a member of the chorus in Chicago…

Ewww. No.

I’d assume he had mum issues.

@Qbish for pearl clutchers see non weird not fucked up folk. Pearl clutchers is always used by those that think they're so cool, so edgy 🥱

Yeah, I don’t think not wanting to have sex with our partners/husbands when they’re cinched into a corset with their bollocks spatchcocked either side of a pair of silky undercrackers makes us ‘pearl clutchers’.

spatchcocked

😂

😂

This is the right answer!

Each to their own, sometimes it's a kink, other times it's a novelty, it's a mix of perspectives

That is exactly what PP was.

DP, I mean.

Nicely explained! That's what it was for us, a bit of a kink a couple of times, nothing ongoing.

I bet none of you pearl-clutcherts like this clip of Tom Holland at all 😆

@Saladdressed What is God's name is a 'friendship group?!' Is it some kind of club?!

lol true

Stop with the ‘pearl clutchers’ thing.

I know you consider yourself very edgy, ‘Berlin in the 30s’ etc, and I guess your partner must be very lean or skinny, like TC, but me personally not wanting to fuck a trussed-up rugby player with his dick falling out of insufficient silk, does not make me a ‘pearl clutcher’.

<snort> @ spatchcocked bolloks

Well I'm 55 now, so not edgy 😄but we were slim and in our early thirties and it was a blast.

I wouldn’t be attracted to a man in women's underwear generally. Obviously a very attractive man is still going to be attractive in women’s underwear or not. I’d prefer them not though.

I don’t find it odd that some people don’t mind, or even are turned on by men In underwear. I do find it weird when people have to treat others like they’re prudes for not enjoying the same kink as them.