Please can you spend just a couple of minutes trying to understand why they are more than 'just' dolls? That's a genuine request, not a snarky one. If you read the article below (I've pasted a section of it below too) you'll understand the history behind them and perhaps come back and acknowledge you weren't aware of it before?
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/sep/21/golliwogs-vile-throwback-tory-mps
Perhaps it would be useful to discuss the tradition of dehumanising racist caricature to which these dolls belong. The English-American author Florence Upton invented the golliwog in a series of picture books produced at the onset of the Jim Crow laws, which mandated racial segregation in the American South.
She described the character as "a horrid sight, the blackest gnome". He was clothed in the same apparel as the black-faced minstrels then prevalent in Europe and North America. He had thick lips, unruly black hair, and his hands and feet were paws.
The golliwog, like many related stereotypes of "primitive" black people ("picaninnies", minstrels, "mammies" and so on), quickly found a commercial market, producing a flood of cartoons and advertising imagery. It was taken up as a symbol by Hamleys, Harrods, Trebor and Robertson's jam. This imagery was consistent with a tendency to represent black people through the prism of biological racism. For example, the colonial exhibitions through which European states celebrated their global power featured "human zoos" and "negro villages".
The most insidious feature of these images is that they were intended for consumption by children, part of their socialisation into the adult world of race relations.