It's sly and misrepresenting to glide into your comparison with an "also", because that rewrites what I said. By asking me if I "also thought y was fine" you implied that I said I thought x was fine. I didn't do that, so your question was based on a false premise and merely intended to smear me as a racist, rather than being a genuine question, which is why I didn't bother answering it.
And all you've "pointed out" is your own assumptions, ones that you suddenly invented and brought into the conversation, and about which I've said absolutely nothing.
FWIW, since you won't leave this where it is, and insist on more elaboration of what is a very basic, common form of liberalism and belief in free speech, something most progressive people used to value until quite recently, apparently: yes, I'd have the same approach to Nazi memorabilia. If it's directly or indirectly breaking laws on discrimination with regard to provision of goods and services, or is disruptive to the extent it amounts to some sort of public order offence, or breaks other laws which are generally considered justifiable in a liberal democracy, then it should be dealt with via the law. But I don't think it should be intrinsically against the law to have them or to display them.