there used to be a concept of "conservative with a small c", which when fed into the notion that the Tories were a "broad church" meant that overall, you'd get pretty middle of the road policies. Something for everyone.
However with the advent of single issues - because everything can be made into a single issue if you reduce it to clickbait - then the vista of a self serving machine for transferring money from the poor to the rich started to hove into view. And since the poor can be seduced into voting for it, it's not even evil. Especially when you have a system like FPTP which rejects nuance and balance.
Even on this site, in these forums, there are people who are trampling each other to remove their own rights because "- knows what a woman is", or some other clarion cry of the day.
As someone who knows very well how control and feedback work, especially when applied to large and chaotic systems, and overlaid onto the lessons of history, it's inevitable this state of affairs cannot continue to drift to the right. But the further it gets before the correction kicks in, the more violent and unpredictable that correction will be. And if that's the case, I hope I am cold in the ground before it happens.
Even in 1986, no one - no one - was even dreaming the Berlin Wall would fall 3 years later.
I noticed an interesting comment in the Telegraph online yesterday. Someone (with rather too much glee, I feel) noted that it had become impossible for the said Torygraph to back the Tories, as there wasn't a clear "Tory" any more. Just a series of in-fighting factions which make it impossible to back the winner. And you can feed the Hancockup message situation into that. A cynic might deduce the Torygraph deliberately chose to be the curator of that hornets nest, to allow them to try and be where the winners are in 2024. Or 2023 ...