No, I think it is rooted in the fact we evolved to raise children in family groups (villages). Your sisters, your aunts, your mother and grandmother could all have cared for your baby and breastfed her if you were busy. The load was shared. Babies were raised by a village.
We live in a WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, Democratic) country which prioritises individuality. Raising a baby where you spend most of your 24 hour day either alone or with one partner is not how our species evolved.
It is our context that causes us such emotional distress when breastfeeding.
I struggled massively with DD1. I felt I had failed. Failed her, failed myself, failed motherhood. I lasted 10 days EBF. I know now I WAS FAILED by the circumstances of MY birth (when I was born, where I was born, etc).
If I had given birth in Scandinavia in 2012, I would've had a much higher chance of breastfeeding successfully.
If I had given birth in Scotland in 1812, I would've had a much higher chance of breastfeeding. But...would I have survived childhood to live long enough to have a child? Would I have survived the post-birth infection I had or would my DD1 be motherless?
With DD2, I knew what I needed to change to try and provide that 'village' and it worked. DD2 breastfed until natural term at nearly 6 years with the first six months EBF. Ironically, it was the physical health benefits that made me want breastfed yet it is the mental health benefits for her that have lasted. Saying that, in consultation with the NHS, we managed to eliminate most of her food allergies through breastfeeding (CMPA, soya, nuts, egg) to natural term.
I feel at peace with what happened with DD1 over a decade ago now. It wasn't my failing or fault. When (if) she asks I can explain what happened AND why.