Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The Lady Hussey racism thing

1000 replies

Tiiiiiiiiiiired · 01/12/2022 10:58

I am really conflicted about this.

If went to live in Japan (I did live there for 3 years several years ago) I would be expected to be asked about where I'm from because I don't look Japanese (and in fact I was asked many times! I didn't mind at all, it was my choice to be in Japan and I knew I didn't look japanese). If I chose to stay in that country and have children, I'd expect my children would be asked the same, and their children and that although they would be Japanese by birth, I would hope they would be happy to talk about their heritage and where they are from and not mind being asked why they don't look Japanese and what the history is. I wouldnt think it racist and wouldn't want such questions to be stopped because we only learn from others, and about others, by talking and feeling safe to ask questions.

So why in the UK does everyone have to be sooo careful with what they say? This woman has a non English name, was wearing some non western clothing, as was asked about her heritage. Why is this abuse?

We need to stop being so sensitive and allow dialogue.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
thehorsehasnowbolted · 01/12/2022 19:54

Why should an organisation have to miss out on an important event for their charity just because the palace behaves this way towards black people?

It says upthread that this charity was not specifically invited. Or did I get it wrong?

MaryMollyPolly · 01/12/2022 19:56

The person on the receiving end of offensive behaviour doesn’t have to be personally offended. “For your conduct or language to be offensive at law it must, be calculated to wound the feelings, arouse anger or resentment or disgust or outrage in the mind of a reasonable person.” Which it clearly has.

dollymixtured · 01/12/2022 19:59

MaryMollyPolly · 01/12/2022 19:56

The person on the receiving end of offensive behaviour doesn’t have to be personally offended. “For your conduct or language to be offensive at law it must, be calculated to wound the feelings, arouse anger or resentment or disgust or outrage in the mind of a reasonable person.” Which it clearly has.

I see someone has been googling 😂

MaryMollyPolly · 01/12/2022 20:02

dollymixtured · 01/12/2022 19:59

I see someone has been googling 😂

Of course. There’s nothing funny about it.

Heavyraindropsarefallingonmyhead · 01/12/2022 20:02

dollymixtured · 01/12/2022 19:59

I see someone has been googling 😂

So MaryMolly said something, you told her she was wrong, she double check the official guidance and now, because you cannot admit you are wrong, you are laughing at her. Okay then.

carefulcalculator · 01/12/2022 20:05

thehorsehasnowbolted · 01/12/2022 19:54

Why should an organisation have to miss out on an important event for their charity just because the palace behaves this way towards black people?

It says upthread that this charity was not specifically invited. Or did I get it wrong?

If the charity was not specifically invited - I do not know about this aspect - are you saying that makes the racism OK?

I do not understand all these people desperate to minimise what happened, unless they are in favour of the palace behaving this way.

What happened is an embarrassment.

dollymixtured · 01/12/2022 20:06

Heavyraindropsarefallingonmyhead · 01/12/2022 20:02

So MaryMolly said something, you told her she was wrong, she double check the official guidance and now, because you cannot admit you are wrong, you are laughing at her. Okay then.

Not quite. Unless Susan Hussey has been charged with some sort of offence in the last 24 hours, MaryMolly’s little google exploration is completely by the by. Love the idea that you think that there is some sort of ‘official guidance’ governing day to day conversations.

dollymixtured · 01/12/2022 20:08

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

GordonShakespearedoesChristmas · 01/12/2022 20:09

TooBigForMyBoots · 01/12/2022 11:04

Lady SH repeatedly dismissed NF telling her she was British. At the end of the conversation she said that NF was "Carribean". Calling a British woman carribean because she is black is racist.

Ngozi Fulani is British.

You are exactly right.

Sitdowncupoftea · 01/12/2022 20:14

@TooBigForMyBoots I'm not an apologist I have nothing to apologise for. I am entitled to an opinion like many others on here and we all won't agree. I was not there neither were you. Some people take offense more easily than others and some look for offence in everything any anything. However racism is not acceptable and that goes towards all races and skin colours. And don't presume to know my ethnicity either.

InsomniacVampire · 01/12/2022 20:16

TallulahBetty · 01/12/2022 11:03

If you were BORN in Japan though, you would be Japanese, and would probably identify as such? If someone kept asking and asking, despite you telling them you were born there over and over, wouldn't you be annoyed?

In Japan it ddoes not matter where you are born really, it's your heritage that makes you Japanese or not in the eyes of the public opinion. You can be born in Japan and have parents born in Japan but of non-Japanese background and you will never be seen as fully Japanese. End of really. If you watch any clips of mixed race people or people of non-Japanese parents born and fully raised in Japan, they will always say the same thing- they never are regarded as 'Japanese' by the society even if they have the citizenship etc.

Heavyraindropsarefallingonmyhead · 01/12/2022 20:20

dollymixtured · 01/12/2022 20:06

Not quite. Unless Susan Hussey has been charged with some sort of offence in the last 24 hours, MaryMolly’s little google exploration is completely by the by. Love the idea that you think that there is some sort of ‘official guidance’ governing day to day conversations.

Ah you are ignoring the hate speech laws which are literally official guidance/laws that govern day to day conversation making it illegal to express hatred to someone on account of race or sexuality etc etc

I can see why you would want to ignore that

thehorsehasnowbolted · 01/12/2022 20:21

outrage in the mind of a reasonable person

What is a 'reasonable person'? It's difficult to judge based on some of the responses on this thread. Most are looking to be offended by everything and anything

carefulcalculator · 01/12/2022 20:23

dollymixtured · 01/12/2022 20:06

Not quite. Unless Susan Hussey has been charged with some sort of offence in the last 24 hours, MaryMolly’s little google exploration is completely by the by. Love the idea that you think that there is some sort of ‘official guidance’ governing day to day conversations.

It wasn't a day-to-day conversation, Lady SH was in an official role, from which they have had to resign.

There is lots of guidance within workplaces and other organisations covering exactly this sort of thing.

It did not take place in the street.

dollymixtured · 01/12/2022 20:23

Heavyraindropsarefallingonmyhead · 01/12/2022 20:20

Ah you are ignoring the hate speech laws which are literally official guidance/laws that govern day to day conversation making it illegal to express hatred to someone on account of race or sexuality etc etc

I can see why you would want to ignore that

As I said, has Susan Hussey been charged under that legislation? If you think it applies then no doubt you have reported to the Met. If not why not? Just out of interest could you clearly explain which part of the exchange you understand to be expressing hatred.

thehorsehasnowbolted · 01/12/2022 20:23

What happened is an embarrassment

Indeed. I would be embarrassed if I piggybacked into BP, caused mayhem and a 60-year serving lady had to resign.

carefulcalculator · 01/12/2022 20:25

thehorsehasnowbolted · 01/12/2022 20:21

outrage in the mind of a reasonable person

What is a 'reasonable person'? It's difficult to judge based on some of the responses on this thread. Most are looking to be offended by everything and anything

No, not 'everything and anything', racism.

carefulcalculator · 01/12/2022 20:26

thehorsehasnowbolted · 01/12/2022 20:23

What happened is an embarrassment

Indeed. I would be embarrassed if I piggybacked into BP, caused mayhem and a 60-year serving lady had to resign.

You are very out of touch, both with the modern world in general and also with the views of the palace. The palace is not embarrassed by the guest.

Heavyraindropsarefallingonmyhead · 01/12/2022 20:26

Because I believe Ngozi has the agency to make that decision on her own and I will not presume to make it for her. In the same way that if she accused someone of rape I would not report it to the Met either.

By your logic if someone is raped and the rapist isn't charged the rape didn't happen

stuntbubbles · 01/12/2022 20:26

thehorsehasnowbolted · 01/12/2022 20:23

What happened is an embarrassment

Indeed. I would be embarrassed if I piggybacked into BP, caused mayhem and a 60-year serving lady had to resign.

How does one piggyback into Buckingham Palace, out of interest? Security is pretty tight. It’s not a minimum wage bouncer in a high-vis vest half-heartedly shining a torch into people’s bags and waving you through without checking the date on your ticket.

VestaTilley · 01/12/2022 20:29

I would’ve agreed, if she’d just asked “where are you from?” once. But she asked again, and again, and again. If she wasn’t point making she was certainly tone deaf! And she lifted up her hair!!

dollymixtured · 01/12/2022 20:29

Heavyraindropsarefallingonmyhead · 01/12/2022 20:26

Because I believe Ngozi has the agency to make that decision on her own and I will not presume to make it for her. In the same way that if she accused someone of rape I would not report it to the Met either.

By your logic if someone is raped and the rapist isn't charged the rape didn't happen

For your sake I am going to pretend that you didn’t just try equate a conversation with rape.

FirewomanSam · 01/12/2022 20:29

So according to this thread, racism isn’t racism if it happens at an event you weren’t personally invited to, if it happens when you’re wearing leopard print, or if it happens to someone who has changed their name. Gotcha.

TooBigForMyBoots · 01/12/2022 20:32

The allegation is that Lady H was trying to put her in her place.

That makes sense. There is no way a woman with Lady SH's experience and knowledge would accidentally behave in such a disgraceful way. It would also explain the speed and strength of the Palace's statement.

Sometimeswinning · 01/12/2022 20:33

dollymixtured · 01/12/2022 20:29

For your sake I am going to pretend that you didn’t just try equate a conversation with rape.

Worrying isn't it!? Rape is traumatic and violent. This was at worse extremely offensive.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread