I’d want to do the same - mother kills children’s abuser

[HermioneKipper]

www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/sarah-sands-kill-sex-abuse-paedophile-b2231508.html

i think any parent would do the same if given the chance

Then that’s one thing. I guess maybe you wouldn’t - most people wouldn’t. But I think you would feel differently, affected as you are by violence, knowing your own children had been the victim of the worst violence.

Exactly - the murder act was all about the mother's personal feelings/beliefs and not about her kids. It was entirely self serving.

It isn’t legal to rape and abuse children, and it’s men and women doing it btw.

Whatevs. Call it what you want “fear and anger” not “hatred and violence” still doesn’t excuse stabbing someone to death. And there’s tons of hatred on this thread regarding paedophiles. Don’t deserve to live, kill them all, they’re evil from posters is pretty indicative of hatred and violence.

At least those kids know she's got their back, even if she wasn't there for a bit.

I doubt he would have been locked up for long. He had a history of being a paedophile and was continually let out to strike again. This whole situation could have been avoided if they had locked him up indefinitely. The poor family were a victim of a let down in the justice system that allowed this man free to change his identity, move house and start being a predator again.
they should take gavin Williams knighthood away and give it to this woman.

"...for a bit"

Do you genuinely think her children are better off without their mother for almost 8 years?

And saving other children is worth it? No, no way would I sacrifice my life with my own children for random children I don’t know.

Obviously everyone is different but I really struggle to understand your outlook that killing this man and therefore leaving her children to deal with the aftermath of the abuse without their mother for close to a decade was ultimately worth it.

It could never be worth it imo.

It was poorly thought revenge that her children had to pay the price for.

It is overwhelmingly men. Women very very rarely sexually abuse children, and when they do they often do alongside a man. There’s absolutely no point denying that.

And if a man can do it over twenty times and still change his name and come back for another go, it’s basically legal. There’s no justice there. And of course there’s hatred to child sex abusers! It would be odd if there wasn’t.

Because the other times he was handed down jail time? And the sentences get progressively harsher for reoffenders? It’s not hard to look up the sentencing guidelines.

Yes, the other twenty times, after which he changed his name and did it again…

He would not have been in jail long enough to keep every other child safe from him. That’s a fact.

No it’s not legal and so what it’s mostly men, my point is that it’s both men and women in case you were thinking it’s legal for men but illegal for women to abuse and rape children. I think you are confused- He had served jail time for his prior convictions. That’s an issue with sentences being too light, it’s not an issue of it being legal.

And there’s tons of hatred on this thread regarding paedophiles. Don’t deserve to live, kill them all, they’re evil from posters is pretty indicative of hatred and violence.

Thank fuck for that. If someone does hate nonces, there's something wrong with them.

Whatever, still wrong to stab him to death. She’s no hero in my eyes.

I'd be in favour of an eye for an eye, if they shouldn't be murdered.

Give them to big massive BDSM bloke and let them have what they did be acted out on them.

I'd support that.

I sincerely hope not.
When I first heard of MAP in relation to paedophiles I googled it- And there was a site up back then presenting attraction to children as acceptable ( In their eyes)

Appalling.
There seems to be no “ Cure” for it, either, as a lot of paedophiles reoffend.
Being able to name change is crazy.

I’m obviously not saying there isn’t laws against it, I’m saying people get away with it so overwhelmingly that it may as well be legal.

And of course I know it’s also illegal for women, but it is a crime that is committed almost entirely by men. Women who rape children are the tiny tiny minority. And I am not confused at all. I am saying that those insisting he should have suffered in jail instead aren’t seeing that he would have been out after a short time and ready to choose a new name and a new victim.

You are desperate to defend this man and the flawed justice system that protects men like him - why is that?

A bit? Really, 7.5 years of their lives when they needed her most and she wasn't there.

Ah yes, state-sanctioned rape is always good fun.

The problem seems to be that these types of offenders are extremely devious and this behaviour very quickly appears to become a compulsion, it is horrifying and sickening.

You sound very bloodthirsty for violence and full of hate. There are vast amounts of middle ground between “sweetness” “light” “mollycoddling” “understanding” and “fuck them, cut off their dick if they can’t be murdered in the streets”

It’s really unsettling to hear posters say this sort of violent language.

The only reason I wouldn't is because my child would need me so I wouldn't risk jail.

If I could get away with it, hell yes, that MF would die.

This stops children coming forward, Most abusers are family members or family friends and most children do not want their abuser murdered.

I mean I think it’s unsettling to hear a poster more than once say ‘whatever’ about a man who prolifically raped and abused young children. Your flippancy about this man’s crimes (and his violence) are unsettling to me.

I’m not defending him, I am condemning vigilante murder of him by the mum.
She had no right to kill him. She should not have done it. It is very dangerous for any society to allow vigilantes to go about and kill with impunity.