Absolutely this. It's all part of the same, bigger, picture. Once the pieces have slotted together, once you've seen these separate, discrete social justice movements as part of one big holistic 'ism' - one without nuance and which shrieks 'either you're with us or you're against us, and if you're against us you're a bigot' - you start to see how insidious, sinister and thoroughly coercive the whole thing has become.
In some shades of the picture, it's turned into a game of linguistic contortionism, in which you find yourself picking your way around a metaphorical minefield to avoid an accidental misstep like a cat on hot bricks. 'Woman' has become a dirty word, female anatomy like a dirty secret. Any of that misogynistic rhetoric sound familiar?, yet if you object to it, you're accused of 'policing' gender and sexuality, and in this way are tantamount to a racist. Excluding gender on the basis of biology, this line of reasoning goes, is like excluding black women on account of their skin colour. And this kind of 'reasoning' happens on a regular basis.
That's why it's starting to look like a bigger picture. That's why I've stopped wearing the poppy, which I used to wear on a voluntary basis but is now looking like an instrument of coercion with people being shamed for not wearing it. That isn't what this image was meant to stand for; the ironic about face as to what former generations fought for has been completely lost in this melee.
History has shown us many times how this kind of rhetoric tends to end, and it's not in a utopia. There's no mistaking it: this is not just about racism.
'Under His Eye'.