Well, your below quote posted in response to my one about bombing civilians sounds very much like a justification of their behaviour.
Perhaps if we were treated as equals in the first place the fight would not have been necessary.
Well they weren't treated as equals were they? Peaceful protests didn't work. Women were manhandled by police, put in prison and were force fed & assaulted for wanting the right to vote, was any of that acceptable? Pankhurst never wanted violence and urged it not to happen. Some women within the suffragettes WERE violent undoubtedly which is obviously very regrettable. So what I was trying to say was calling the suffragettes a violent movement is simplistic and fails to look at the context of the situation that these women were in. What I did not say was I thought blowing up innocent people was the solution which is what you implied I said.
I certainly don't think that it is women who are the violent party in the current women's rights fight. It is the TRAs who are using aggressive tactics to take women's rights.