Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Not sure whether to be a sahm or not

1000 replies

Flowerpicker1 · 06/11/2022 20:21

Had 2 under 2. My maternity leave is now coming to an end following the birth of my 2nd dc. Neither dc are in nursery. DH is on a good wage.

Have been given the option not to return to work if I don't want to. Dh can cover us. It would be part not full time anyway.3 days.

Not sure what to do. On one hand I'd love to be there for all of my dcs childhood but on the other I worry if I would cope. We don't have any family or support nearby.

If you work would you rather be a sahm and not put your children in nursery? Or have you done this and loved it/regretted it?

OP posts:
Topgub · 07/11/2022 22:28

Society already is fairly child friendly

Women have lots of scope.

What we need to work on is more flexibility for men

TheMoops · 07/11/2022 22:30

Puddywoodycat · 07/11/2022 22:27

Significant times!!

What's a significant time?

2 years?

5 ??

It's very sector dependent.
Some sectors/roles will be more conducive to longer periods out of the job. Others not so much .....

People generally have a good idea how it works in their own roles

Walkaround · 07/11/2022 22:30

blueshoes · 07/11/2022 22:22

We would have looked harder. Researched more options. Maybe the nursery would be farther away. Perhaps we would use a nanny or childminder. As it is, I worked pt so reducing the need for childcare. My mother came over to help. We could have worked flexi hours so Dh and I could carve out the day between ourselves.

When there is a will, there is a way, if you want something to work.

Even if the nursery were high quality, if dd did not settle, then we would find other options. Important thing is to stay attuned to the child's needs and be flexible. Money obviously helps in this regard. We have done that throughout our dcs' lives and they are both very different children.

So, presumably, you would have delayed, or interrupted, or disrupted returning to the workplace if necessary, in order to ensure you had appropriate childcare in place that suited the needs of your children.

blueshoes · 07/11/2022 22:32

@Puddywoodycat I think balance is the way forward and I don't want to sleep walk into a default, you have a baby and you put that baby into nursery.

Another strawman. Who said that?

PS there are lots of different types of childcare, not just the 9-5, 5-day babybusting nursery. There are grandparents, childminders, nannies.

Topgub · 07/11/2022 22:33

Why do sahms all seem to presume that the only option is baby jail for 90 hours a week?

TikNeres · 07/11/2022 22:36

blueshoes · 07/11/2022 22:27

No it isn't. Where have i said that?

🙄

So it's a fact then? This: because it IS best for the child to have a fulfilled working mother, high quality childcare (which I researched and settled her into) during the work day is a fact, and not just your opinion?

Just want to be clear.

blueshoes · 07/11/2022 22:37

Walkaround · 07/11/2022 22:30

So, presumably, you would have delayed, or interrupted, or disrupted returning to the workplace if necessary, in order to ensure you had appropriate childcare in place that suited the needs of your children.

As most working parents do, they would have researched childcare well before the return date to minimise the disruption. Yes, I would have delayed the return to work but that would not be ideal (and pretty bad planning because after a year, the employer does not keep a job open for me).

To get the nursery of our choice, I put dd's name down from almost birth and we got it. I applied for pt flex working in my role but that was refused by my
employer so I moved sideways into a role which did allow flex working.

I don't want to say any more about what I did because another poster accused me of making it about me. I am merely answering your direct question.

Walkaround · 07/11/2022 22:37

TheMoops · 07/11/2022 22:26

It’s fairly obvious what it has to do with @TheMoops . It’s possible to have children, stay at home with them for a few years, then retrain as a doctor or dentist and have a career. So it just can work for the professions you were talking about, if people remove their unconscious bias towards people who don’t pursue a traditional timeline.

Where have I said it's not possible to do all of that?? I'm a qualified careers adviser who has worked with women returners so I'm pretty knowledgeable about that. I'm now an academic who researches women's career development. I run a course at a university which attracts a significant amount of women who are retaining after having a family.

Retraining is very different to taking years out of a profession and hoping to return to a job you've not done for a significant time.
That's not unconscious bias, that's just knowledge of the labour market.

But that is revealing an unconscious bias if you are basically arguing you won’t be able to work as a doctor or dentist again if you have taken time out of the workplace, but should be allowed to work in those professions if you start from scratch. You talk about retraining - it’s not retraining if you haven’t started training, yet. The unconscious bias is this idea that if you take time out, you can’t go back - and it results in a major and unnecessary permanent loss of skills to the workplace, because appropriate retraining is not offered, on the assumption that someone will have forgotten virtually everything they have ever been taught.

blueshoes · 07/11/2022 22:39

TikNeres · 07/11/2022 22:36

🙄

So it's a fact then? This: because it IS best for the child to have a fulfilled working mother, high quality childcare (which I researched and settled her into) during the work day is a fact, and not just your opinion?

Just want to be clear.

Oh I see what is getting your heckles. Wondering why there is a feeding frenzy around this. No, not a fact. It is my personal experience in response to a post of similar categoricalness.

TikNeres · 07/11/2022 22:39

Topgub · 07/11/2022 22:33

Why do sahms all seem to presume that the only option is baby jail for 90 hours a week?

All of them? Baby jail? 90 hours per week?

What a helpful comment. Really encourages intelligent debate.

Walkaround · 07/11/2022 22:39

And retraining is precisely about returning to a job or career you have not done for a very long time.

TheMoops · 07/11/2022 22:42

Walkaround · 07/11/2022 22:39

And retraining is precisely about returning to a job or career you have not done for a very long time.

No it's not.
Retraining refers to training in a new section or profession.

blueshoes · 07/11/2022 22:43

Walkaround · 07/11/2022 22:37

But that is revealing an unconscious bias if you are basically arguing you won’t be able to work as a doctor or dentist again if you have taken time out of the workplace, but should be allowed to work in those professions if you start from scratch. You talk about retraining - it’s not retraining if you haven’t started training, yet. The unconscious bias is this idea that if you take time out, you can’t go back - and it results in a major and unnecessary permanent loss of skills to the workplace, because appropriate retraining is not offered, on the assumption that someone will have forgotten virtually everything they have ever been taught.

You are not really living in the real world if you think doctors and dentists can just waltz back in with 'retraining'. They are supposed to keep their training up-to-date with CPD. It is not quite shelf stacking.

TikNeres · 07/11/2022 22:45

blueshoes · 07/11/2022 22:39

Oh I see what is getting your heckles. Wondering why there is a feeding frenzy around this. No, not a fact. It is my personal experience in response to a post of similar categoricalness.

Heckles Grin No, mine are quite un-raised. Not sure why you think otherwise - my post was brief and quite lacking in any drama.

You presented your opinion as a fact. Just checking that it was of course, just your own experience, and not based on anything more expansive than that.

Rubyupbeat · 07/11/2022 22:45

I loved being a sahm. I understand it isn't for everyone.
I could never have missed all the milestones, or handed mine over to someone to look after them instead of me.
They had a busy social life, I had lots of friends, I never regretted a day of it. I also did academic courses once they were in school and gained a doctorate
I'm not far off 60 now and would do the same again.

Topgub · 07/11/2022 22:47

@TikNeres

Sense of humour bypass?

Topgub · 07/11/2022 22:48

Or post platitudes and clichés and act like they're unique to sahms?

TheMoops · 07/11/2022 22:48

But that is revealing an unconscious bias if you are basically arguing you won’t be able to work as a doctor or dentist again if you have taken time out of the workplace,
O I haven't dated that. But you will need to either update your skills or maintain your skills during your absence from the workplace.

but should be allowed to work in those professions if you start from scratch. You talk about retraining - it’s not retraining if you haven’t started training, yet. The unconscious bias is this idea that if you take time out, you can’t go back - and it results in a major and unnecessary permanent loss of skills to the workplace, because appropriate retraining is not offered, on the assumption that someone will have forgotten virtually everything they have ever been taught.

I don't think you know what retraining or unconscious bias is!! You've used both terms incorrectly multiple times now.
I don't have an unconscious bias towards people returning to work. However, I have detailed knowledge about the labour market.

blueshoes · 07/11/2022 22:48

TikNeres · 07/11/2022 22:45

Heckles Grin No, mine are quite un-raised. Not sure why you think otherwise - my post was brief and quite lacking in any drama.

You presented your opinion as a fact. Just checking that it was of course, just your own experience, and not based on anything more expansive than that.

Yes, I see that. It is the posts that present opinion as if it were incontrovertible unproveable 100% fact that are most annoying. Apologies for the confusion.

TheMoops · 07/11/2022 22:49
  • training in a new sector
Walkaround · 07/11/2022 22:50

blueshoes · 07/11/2022 22:43

You are not really living in the real world if you think doctors and dentists can just waltz back in with 'retraining'. They are supposed to keep their training up-to-date with CPD. It is not quite shelf stacking.

My df was a doctor - I am fully aware of the CPD requirements, etc. Also fully aware that you are revealing your own unconscious bias if you believe anyone returning to medicine after a few years will be incapable of retraining and will just expect to “waltz back.”

Topgub · 07/11/2022 22:51

If we want women to be able to take career breaks and return to work with bi bias, we have to make men do the same.

I wonder what they could do in their career break?

🤔

Topgub · 07/11/2022 22:52

How long of a career break did your oh tale @Walkaround ?

TikNeres · 07/11/2022 22:53

Topgub · 07/11/2022 22:47

@TikNeres

Sense of humour bypass?

Not really. Your comment read like a yet another tired ol' takedown of SAHMs peppered with hyperbole, but I'll take your word for it that it was a joke.

blueshoes · 07/11/2022 22:54

Walkaround · 07/11/2022 22:50

My df was a doctor - I am fully aware of the CPD requirements, etc. Also fully aware that you are revealing your own unconscious bias if you believe anyone returning to medicine after a few years will be incapable of retraining and will just expect to “waltz back.”

ok, my df and db are doctors. Do I win?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.