Yes. However ,when we look at choice, and rights and SAFEGUARDING both women and their rights we don't look just at the (hypothetical) happy outcomes of rainbows and pink fluffy unicorns.
We look at risk, real life outcomes,statistics.
We know pregnancy and birth carry risks for women, from physical to mental. Now add in really not wanting that baby.
We know there is a risk,even if minimal of death.
We know there aren't enough adopters.
We know outcomes for children in care aren't great to put it mildly.
We know that banning abortions, only bans safe abortions. The likelihood of women being harmed,maimed, left disabled or infertile, and even dead increases when safe ,legal abortion is not available or easily accessible.
We know (from looking at other countries) that banning abortions increases the number of abandoned children to such a level that authorities can't cope and extreme abuse,neglect and damage takes place. That's without babies being abandoned in woods,bins, alleys etc and dying from exposure.
We know that a lot of abusive and controlling men use pregnancies to further trap women.
So looking at all that how can you actually believe that limiting or banning abortions, is not only a good idea ,but the one that's morally better?