I think there is a huge difference between people wanting zero immigration and being concerned about how many we seem to welcome on an almost daily basis.
I have no issue with those who go via the proper channels and apply. After all, no one complains about Australia and their system where you are unlikely to get accepted without a trade, money or a sponsor.
However, I can't help but be concerned by Dover. I know many stories in the press are designed to sensationalise a situation, but it is uncontrolled. My concern isn't just for the numbers but how much we have paid France to attempt to stop it. France has basically banked it and laughed at us.
I also worry that it is mainly men. Whilst no one wants more women and children to drown, the amount of men is worrying. And are they really refugees or economic migrants? To my mind, refugees do indeed seek sanctuary in the first safe zone they reach.
As someone who lived near a very early hotel for migrants as a teen, who saw some of the behaviour these males engaged in, yes it worries me as I have a teen DD. There would be groups of 5 or 6, sitting on the wall outside and the things they used to say even to girls like me in school uniform was disgusting. They would think nothing of grabbing girls round the waist. And if you dared tell them to piss off the aggression was scary.
Not everyone is like that. But even a handful is unacceptable.
I also agree with someone who said our resources are at breaking point. The NHS is a big attraction and I saw an article this week about the money the NHS has lost due to health tourism, as they don't get paid by those who disappear after being treated.
I just think people would be less annoyed about it if we helped those on the streets already. Many are told they need to find their own private accomodation or that they are intentionally homeless. How must these people feel knowing that others get helped without question.