I think it's because her solution to the energy crisis was tax cuts and not handouts. She's back peddled on that now but how she thought that would help the poor is unbelievable, when most don't pay tax.
Most of her proposals only benefit people in work and earning reasonable money.
Personally she'll be as bad as the rest so not much change really.
But she's a woman so that's positive in itself. For good or for bad that's what it's about and AFAIC women in power need the opportunity to be as good or bad as their male counterparts.