I tend to agree.
If Tattle didn’t exist, it wouldn’t stop people having negative opinions of influencers and other celebrities. People are going to think their own thoughts, and share them. You can’t prevent that, and nor should anyone attempt to
I think it’s healthy that Tattle exists. There will be a few nutcases on it, as with all forums. But, where else will cynical attempts to monetise young people be questioned and exposed?
Who are the ‘influencers’ mostly influencing? Oh yes, kids and young people. Why was the flinty-eyed Zoella attempting to sell kids a crappy advent calendar for £50? Because whoever was making money from it knew that little girls are susceptible to being influenced by these calculating people, who know which buttons to press.
Why are Gleam Futures, who manage many of the U.K. influencers, making money? Because they are tapping into the vulnerabilities and insecurities of young people and exploiting them. With the help of sponsors. Every time an influencer affects e.g. mental health problems, claiming to offer hope or support to innocent followers, what are they really interested in? Really helping people, or just the clicks and likes and follows?
That’s why it’s right that a place exists where this sort of business is questioned and challenged. I don’t doubt that there are some less pleasant corners of Tattle, but it’s right that it exists. Better that than nobody ever being allowed to express a negative opinion about these people. Influencers’ followers, some of whom might see the influencer as a friend or advocate or even, god forbid, a role model, are nothing more than revenue and future EBITDA projections, to be milked for their spending power.